@DCGoldPants Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Here is a headline we deserve. "Does Ted Cruz have the courage in 2024 to stand up to the person who slandered his wife and father yet?" 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 2 hours ago, Die Hard said: “Stormy Daniels. Can you describe the defendant’s anatomy?” LOL not that big 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Regarding the WaPo article on Lyin' Ted: Below is a an extremely funny paragraph in that article, and I laughed out load when I read it, but I wish journalists would be less tongue-in-check and, rather, be a lot more straightforward in calling Trump a dumbass. Quote Cruz’s “father, you know, was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald’s, you know, being shot,” he said in an interview on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends,” mixing up the details a bit. “What was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the death?” he added. “Before the shooting? It’s horrible.” 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Katie Phang is filling in for Ari Melber on msnbc. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: That's a pretty big risk for Nauta. He's going to prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 4 hours ago, The Evil Genius said: Really? Because all I've really seen Pecker testify to, is that he intentionally placed his newspapers completely in the tank for the Trump campaign. And newspapers are allowed to do that. We have a long history of it. A great many people believe (incorrectly) that "The Liberal Media" does exactly the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 (edited) 4 hours ago, Larry said: Really? Because all I've really seen Pecker testify to, is that he intentionally placed his newspapers completely in the tank for the Trump campaign. And newspapers are allowed to do that. We have a long history of it. A great many people believe (incorrectly) that "The Liberal Media" does exactly the same thing. The contention is that in doing so, Trump violated New York Election Law 17-152. That law prohibits conspiracies to promote the election of a specific candidate through unlawful means. Edited April 24 by The Evil Genius 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 I still wish the Georgia case would have gone first. THAT's the one that will be televised, and necessary PRIOR to the election. Drumpf swallowers need to see all the evidence and testimony in that case, although I'm sure Faux News will air car chases and how the "tide goes in and out" 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simmsy Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 6 hours ago, illone said: I still wish the Georgia case would have gone first. THAT's the one that will be televised, and necessary PRIOR to the election. Drumpf swallowers need to see all the evidence and testimony in that case, although I'm sure Faux News will air car chases and how the "tide goes in and out" I think it will give people on the fence about him a reason NOT to vote for him. It won't sway liberals or his base in either direction. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 19 hours ago, PleaseBlitz said: Regarding the WaPo article on Lyin' Ted: Below is a an extremely funny paragraph in that article, and I laughed out load when I read it... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 12 hours ago, The Evil Genius said: The contention is that in doing so, Trump violated New York Election Law 17-152. That law prohibits conspiracies to promote the election of a specific candidate through unlawful means. Yep...the Enquirer did far, FAR more than endorse Trump or print some pro-Trump articles lol... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 2 hours ago, The Evil Genius said: Cohen being sly lol..."Unlike SOME people--ahem--I have great respect for the judge and will voluntarily gag myself." 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 at "the gagged defendant" 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 CNN saying "Pecker was watching Trump and Trump was watching Pecker" while in court. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 2 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 Are they sure Trump is unindicted coconspirator 1? Former president of the United States could be anybody 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 6 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Are they sure Trump is unindicted coconspirator 1? Former president of the United States could be anybody Damn Jimmy Carter. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Are they sure Trump is unindicted coconspirator 1? Former president of the United States could be anybody 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 My faith in humanity has been restored. Nee York hates you. 😆 8 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Trump and His Mar-a-Lago Co-Defendants Switch Tactics Attorneys for Donald Trump’s co-defendants switched direction in a motion Tuesday, arguing that FBI agents weren’t thorough enough in their search of the ex-president’s Mar-a-Lago estate when they retrieved top-secret documents from there in 2022. The abrupt about-face—after over a year of Trump and his allies decrying the search itself as “unconstitutional” and invasive—referred to the fact that federal investigators missed a “hidden room” near Trump’s bedroom and a locked closet during their search of the premises, both of which may have contained classified documents. Now, attorneys for Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta—and on behalf of Carlos De Oliveira and Trump himself—have demanded that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s cough up “records concerning the FBI’s apparent failure to search several areas of President Trump’s residence during their execution of a search warrant on Mar-a-Lago.” If approved, the request would require Smith’s team to hand over any internal government communications related to the search of Mar-a-Lago that reference these hidden rooms—which they allege were known to the FBI prior to its raid. The defense is apparently using the government oversight to argue that their own obstruction charges are invalid, thanks to feds’ willful “ignorance” about the existence of the room they missed in their search. “Indeed, the only explanation for this failure is that the [special counsel office] intends to rely on its ignorance of what was in former President Trump’s residence as part of its pitch to the jury that boxes were moved for the purpose of concealing their contents from the investigation,” the motion said. Click on the link for the full article 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now