Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

The Unofficial "Elon Musk trying to "Save Everyone" from Themselves (except his Step-Sister)" Thread...


Renegade7

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

Are you aware of something else? The video shows otherwise. 

Yes, if the fsd suite slows down you are supposed to apply acceleration. You are responsible for the car at all times. If you set up a tall ladder on an incline and it fell over, would you blame the ladder or the idiot behind the wheel.

 

1 hour ago, mistertim said:

 

So FSD putting on the turn signal, moving into the left lane and then immediately braking to a stop in the middle of a highway didn't cause the crash? What did, then? Are you claiming the driver is lying and actually did that themselves?

The software did that becuase the driver did not respond to nags, audio chimes, an red flashing lights for at least 30 seconds. It’s all in the manual. The car did exactly what it said it would do.

 

1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said:

He hates misinformation so much he's unbanning the absolute dregs of the internet.

 

Fair point.

 

Of course, that does not fit with his pledge to stop misinformation, but then again, I wasn’t making a blanket statement about the job he is doing regarding misinformation.

 

1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said:


 

 

 
Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mistertim said:

 

I mean, hey...as long as they admit that they're lying hucksters it's all good I guess.

 

of course, if you ever drove a Tesla with the fsd beta suite you’d know what you are saying isn’t true. As part of the fsd software suite you get constantly updated driving assist software (that works really good most of the time) as well as free fsd related hardware upgrades for the life of the car.  (You don’t get the hardware upgrades if you pay for fsd monthly subscription).

 

btw, this says nothing about how fsd beta performed. The car operated as expected once receiving no input from the driver for an extended period of time.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mistertim said:

 

I mean, hey...as long as they admit that they're lying hucksters it's all good I guess.

Ikr?  :ols:

 

Seriously, CC84?  You're doing that self-ownage thing again. 

Why have (and pay for) it if it's not going to work?  That's the whole point, right?  Especially when lives are involved.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said:

Ikr?  :ols:

 

Seriously, CC84?  You're doing that self-ownage thing again. 

Why have (and pay for) it if it's not going to work?  That's the whole point, right?  Especially when lives are involved.

It is a driver assist feature. It works most of the time in most scenarios. I mean, All I have to say is try it. 

 

But specifically in regards to that accident, here is what the vehicle manual says: (my emphasis)


 

Quote

Hold Steering Wheel

Autosteer determines how best to steer Model Y. When active, Autosteer requires you to hold the steering wheel. If it does not detect your hands on the steering wheel for a period of time, a flashing blue light appears at the top of the car status section of the touchscreen and the following message displays:

Hands on steering wheel
Apply slight turning force to steering wheel

Autosteer detects your hands by recognizing slight resistance as the steering wheel turns, or from you manually turning the steering wheel very lightly (without enough force to take over steering).Autosteer also qualifies your hands as being detected if you engage a turn signal or use a button or scroll wheel on the steering wheel.

Note
When your hands are detected, the message disappears and Autosteer resumes normal operation.

Autosteer requires that you pay attention to your surroundings and remain prepared to take control at any time. If Autosteer still does not detect your hands on the steering wheel, the flashing light on the car status section of the touchscreen increases in frequency and a chime sounds.

If you repeatedly ignore Autosteer's prompts to apply slight force to the steering wheel, Autosteer disables for the rest of the drive and displays the following message requesting you to drive manually. If you don't resume manual steering, Autosteer sounds a continuous chime, turns on the warning flashers, and slows the vehicle to a complete stop.

 

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

It is a driver assist feature. It works most of the time in most scenarios. I mean, All I have to say is try it. 

 

But specifically in regards to that accident, here is what the vehicle manual says: (my emphasis)

 

 

Maybe, but from what the driver reported, it doesn't sound like this was the case, and the driver is a lawyer so it's pretty unlikely that he'd blatantly lie to the cops. Though apparently he may have thought it was in FSD when it was actually in autopilot/driver assist. It sounds a bit more like a "phantom braking" issue. This goes pretty in depth.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2023/01/11/an-8-car-pileup-started-by-a-tesla-in-autopilot-opens-up-many-complex-issues/

Edited by mistertim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mistertim said:

 

Maybe, but from what the driver reported, it doesn't sound like this was the case, and the driver is a lawyer so it's pretty unlikely that he'd blatantly lie to the cops. Though apparently he may have thought it was in FSD when it was actually in autopilot/driver assist. It sounds a bit more like a "phantom braking" issue. This goes pretty in depth.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2023/01/11/an-8-car-pileup-started-by-a-tesla-in-autopilot-opens-up-many-complex-issues/


phantom breaking will not bring the car to a complete stop. Even if it did, using autopilot the way it is described in the cars manual will give you plenty of time to react. I have experienced phantom breaking. The car slows from 70 to 55 in about 2 seconds before I am able to recover. It doesn’t slam on the breaks. To correct, you just have to press the accelerator. If you are not paying attention, then I suspect it can be quite jarring. 
 

lawyers don’t lie? 🤭
 

I feel like the article actually casts serious doubt on his account of what happens, specifically:

 

Quote

The Tesla in this case did something quite unusual, if the statement of its driver is to be credited.

 

  1. It attempted an automatic lane change when its own lane was not particularly slow. The car in front was around 3 seconds ahead. Normally such a change happens only when you’ve come up on slower traffic in your lane.
  2. It attempted the change when there were cars behind and to the left of it, which it is usually fairly conservative about — but it does do it, as humans do all the time, though possibly unwisely.
  3. Based on the police report, it attempted the lane change even though it was already braking for some ghost that wasn’t there. After changing it braked even harder. Teslas do not tend to do evasive action and swerve around obstacles, they just brake if they see one — or think they see one.
  4. As a 2021 model S it would still have ultrasonic blind spot sensors

 

As such, something odd was going on here. It’s an unusual enough situation that I haven’t seen much in way of reports on phantom braking before or during a lane change. It seems to have happened, though it’s also possible the driver misreported and manually commanded the lane change. If the driver manually disengaged Autopilot and, in spite of the tones it makes, failed to notice, that could potentially explained it


 

The article is mostly fair, and brings up important considerations for any ADAS system.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr. Do Itch Big said:

Lol did you seriously just say lawyers don’t lie. 
 

i agree with cousins. The person is likely at fault. 

 

To me or you? Of course they do.

 

To the police? Probably not unless they're 100% certain there's no evidence to the contrary, because they know very well how much trouble you can get into by lying about something like that to the cops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mistertim said:

 

To me or you? Of course they do.

 

To the police? Probably not unless they're 100% certain there's no evidence to the contrary, because they know very well how much trouble you can get into by lying about something like that to the cops.

Well, I mean, being wrong about what happened and/or misremembering isn’t against the law. They’d have to prove you knew you were lying, which is hard to do in a case like this even if it turns out autopilot wasn’t even activated.

 

I think the most likely scenario is old dude fell asleep behind navigate on autopilot and slept through the chimes up until the very last panic alert (which is a very loud alarm chime) woke up to his car pulling over and breaking and was unprepared to make the required corrections. So he is telling the truth, autopilot was activated. However, the swerve and stop wasn’t sudden or unexpected, but he slept through the numerous visual/auditory alerts till the last one.

 

Here is a video of the autopilot disengagement sequence (relevant part of the video starts at about 1:25)

 


seems to match up 💯with the accident reported behavior of the tesla.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Califan007 The Constipated said:

 

It's basically cruise control from the 1980s lol...

It’s not tho. Y’all some haters.
 

There’s plenty of rational stuff to hate about Tesla. Like how millions of customers are getting duped to pay for FSD but then their hardware gets outdated so they need to be retro fitted with new hardware to be able to support “FSD” 

 

pretty sure the same is going to happen HW4

 

Buying FSD is stupid

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dr. Do Itch Big said:

It’s not tho. Y’all some haters.
 

There’s plenty of rational stuff to hate about Tesla. Like how millions of customers are getting duped to pay for FSD but then their hardware gets outdated so they need to be retro fitted with new hardware to be able to support “FSD” 

 

pretty sure the same is going to happen HW4

 

Buying FSD is stupid

If you buy fsd you will get the new hardware. the real issue is are you going to still have your Tesla 7-10 years from now? Probably not. When I bought it for 3K it was a good value, when I bought it for 7K it wasn’t worth it but it was close, for 15K there is no way I can talk myself into buying it. I don’t think TSLA wants to sell fsd anymore anyway; they much rather you subscribe to fsd as a service. But it isn’t worth $300/mo either. They give you autopilot for free. If all of that was behind the fsd paywall, it might be worth it.
 

 

I agree buying fsd doesn’t make economic sense.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

Explain why it’s funny then…

 

”the sky is green”

 

”huh?”

 

”the joke is over your head”

 

🤔

 

I was making a joke about what mistertim said...not about the Tesla's self-driving mode. What he described was basically cruse control from the 1980s. But I guess when it comes to Musk, some people get immediately defensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...