The Evil Genius Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said: WUT? Did I get that wrong? 18th century..19th century...20th century...21st century. 🙂 Also... Edited May 7, 2023 by The Evil Genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 SCOTUS will just rule the investigation unconstitutional. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 (edited) Democrats wouldn't have cared if it was an openly corrupt white man! Edited May 7, 2023 by Cooked Crack 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 41 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said: Did I get that wrong? Yes, you got that wrong. And you knew it, which is why you're trying to change what you said. No, I am not 2 centuries old. And neither are you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 16 minutes ago, Larry said: Yes, you got that wrong. And you knew it, which is why you're trying to change what you said. No, I am not 2 centuries old. And neither are you. Nah he wasn’t wrong. He counted it out for you. The document has spanned 4 centuries, as in existed within 4 difference centuries. if it still doesn’t make sense you can use your figures to count out how he listed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 🤭 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 14 minutes ago, tshile said: The document has spanned 4 centuries, as in existed within 4 difference centuries. Which does not make it 4 centuries old. You know, the words he used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 The context was times changing and the ideas was clearly that it has existed throughout 4 centuries and all the various social and political changes though those centuries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 2 hours ago, Jabbyrwock said: You've entered Boebert space. Bro I live in Boebert space I only fool you sometimes 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 1 hour ago, The Evil Genius said: Did I get that wrong? 18th century..19th century...20th century...21st century. 🙂 Also... In all fairness this is exactly what I meant I was just too busy being a smart ass to stop and read what I actually wrote 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 I can’t find it now but I saw a tweet today ranking the 50 most evil white men in history and Thomas made 33rd. Guilty laugh at that one. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 26 minutes ago, Llevron said: I can’t find it now but I saw a tweet today ranking the 50 most evil white men in history and Thomas made 33rd. Guilty laugh at that one. Brady and Jeter. 😆 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 Chase Utley #12. 😂 Robert Moses listed twice. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 6 hours ago, PleaseBlitz said: Chase Utley #12. 😂 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted May 16, 2023 Share Posted May 16, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted May 23, 2023 Share Posted May 23, 2023 The Supreme Court and 'The Shadow Docket' The title sounds more like a thriller than a legal treatise. The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court uses stealth rulings to amass power and undermine the republic" — and the author, University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck, admits the term "shadow docket" is evocative. Vladeck's book, written so it can be understood by the interested non-lawyer, focuses on a part of the court's work that until six or seven years was mainly viewed as pretty boring. That, however is no longer true, and today the emergency docket has come to be known as the shadow docket, a term coined in 2015 by University of Chicago law professor William Baude. Justice Samuel Alito hates the term, and gave an hour-long speech in 2021 at Notre Dame, suggesting that journalists and politicians have seized on it to wrongly portray the court as "sneaky," "sinister," and "dangerous." Nonetheless the term has stuck. Professor Vladeck argues that the court has only itself to blame. "What impelled me to write the book is that over the last six years, we've seen the shadow docket become a lot less boring because the Supreme Court, and especially the conservative majority, has been using unsigned and unexplained orders to a degree and in ways which really have no precedent in the court's history," he said in an interview with NPR. Click on the link for more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted May 23, 2023 Share Posted May 23, 2023 On 5/9/2023 at 1:32 AM, The Evil Genius said: Brady and Jeter. 😆 Manson, Dahmer, Jim Jones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 23, 2023 Share Posted May 23, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted May 23, 2023 Share Posted May 23, 2023 So they're saying you can have an impeachment trial without any investigation? Because the Constitution cleaarly allows for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now