mistertim Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, twa said: Is a tweet a suggestion? I know you're just trolling here. That being said, so far there have been multiple court cases where judges have allowed Trump's own tweets to be admissible evidence. That would certainly indicate that there could be a precedent for his tweets to be seen as official policy statements. So yeah, I think his tweets could definitely be taken that way. Add: Jesus Christ, Barr is such a slimy piece of ****. No wonder Trump likes him. Edited May 1, 2019 by mistertim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCB Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 As always, thanks to Trump voters for putting the country through this. Now **** off for a few decades while we try to fix the mess. ***holes. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) Edited May 1, 2019 by StillUnknown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCB Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Grow a pair and impeach him. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, StillUnknown said: Hold his ass in contempt and throw him in jail. 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 They have to subpoena him before they can hold him in contempt. But they should definitely go down that path. As Barr showed today he's nothing more than Trump's lapdog. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 You’d figure Barr isn’t too busy. His job exonerating Trump of the Mueller report is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Not the Mama! 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, mistertim said: I know you're just trolling here. That being said, so far there have been multiple court cases where judges have allowed Trump's own tweets to be admissible evidence. That would certainly indicate that there could be a precedent for his tweets to be seen as official policy statements. So yeah, I think his tweets could definitely be taken that way. Well I'm pretty sure Trump has tweeted a number of folk should be investigated or locked up. So is that a suggestion to Barr or just Trump bloviating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 17 minutes ago, twa said: Well I'm pretty sure Trump has tweeted a number of folk should be investigated or locked up. So is that a suggestion to Barr or just Trump bloviating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 2 hours ago, StillUnknown said: So have the lawmakers read the questions which their attorneys hand them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Larry said: So have the lawmakers read the questions which their attorneys hand them. They probably want lawyers to come up with good follow up questions on the fly, the lack of which causes me great frustration when watching a jackass like Barr do what he did today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said: They probably want lawyers to come up with good follow up questions on the fly, the lack of which causes me great frustration when watching a jackass like Barr do what he did today. Someone hands congressman a slip of paper. Congressman reads it word for word. Barr lies his ass off. Same person hands congressman another slip of paper. Assuming congress actually wants lawyers asking questions. And seriously, what line are they using to justify objecting to this? "It's just not fair to ask the Attorny General to answer questions from actual lawyers"? Edited May 1, 2019 by Larry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOF44 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Pretty amazing article by Comey. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 LOL. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1123670102535176192 Barr basically saying if the POTUS feels like he is being so nvestigated unjustly he has a right to obstruct. Ignores valid reasons for investigation and how ****ed up the logic he is using is. What a mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 (edited) Edited May 2, 2019 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 45 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said: LOL. I'd be willing to bet 5 bucks that the words "NOT GUILTY" do not appear once in the entire document. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 😞🤢😡 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 40 minutes ago, Larry said: I'd be willing to bet 5 bucks that the words "NOT GUILTY" do not appear once in the entire document. What about Quilty? Chuck Woolery seems to be a QAnon nutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now