Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Jumbo

By Jumbo
in The Tailgate

 Share

Recommended Posts

twa

twa

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Hersh said:

 

The brilliance of the Russian indictments is that it puts pressure on the morons in Congress that want the this investigation to be done. What are they going to say now? 

 

Hurry up?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan T.

Dan T.

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, No Excuses said:

Another plea deal:

 

 

Wonder what they are getting in exchange from this chump. 

 

I read that it was this guy, Richard Pinedo, who supplied the indicted Russians with fake U.S. identification information they could use in their meddling activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LadySkinsFan

LadySkinsFan

Posted
Posted

Remember, Kushner was the digital campaign person. He's the conduit for information about where to target campaign activities.

 

He's the next target for Mueller, hence the days long questioning of Bannon. And there's no love lost between Kushner and Bannon. 

 

That's why Bannon wouldn't talk to Congress and did at length to Mueller's team. 

 

Kushner will be indicted, Trump will pardon him. 

 

After that, Kushner will have to testify against Trump at some point. And Trump can't pardon himself. 

 

Republicans want Mueller to hurry up and bring the investigation to conclusion, they should be careful what they wish for.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said:

 

 

Republicans want Mueller to hurry up and bring the investigation to conclusion, they should be careful what they wish for.

 

Why?....the replacement(if needed) is acceptable to many.

 

I'd say it is more embarrassing to those that allowed it to happen Visionary.
which includes she who cannot be mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedskinsFan44

RedskinsFan44

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Why?....the replacement(if needed) is acceptable to many.

 

I'd say it is more embarrassing to those that allowed it to happen Visionary.
which includes she who cannot be mentioned.

Yeah, but you have an awful large number of Rs who have been defendig Trump against these allegations. You think Pence will look good if Trump goes down? It would be a major hit to the party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Larry

Larry

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, twa said:

 

I'd say it is more embarrassing to those that allowed it to happen Visionary.
which includes she who cannot be mentioned.

 

Right. 

 

Trump blameless. 

Republician obstructionist innocent. 

Hillary guilty. 

 

Seriously, how many shovels have you worn out, over the years?  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Predicto

Predicto

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Aristarchus said:

 

 After looking over the conversations on more "pro-trump" internet locations they are saying "Finally, Mueller has completed his investigation. No knowing collusion!" And, the ever more popular, "See! This was always FAKE NEWS about Trump. Mueller failed to link into the White House." 

 

eMails, Benghazi, better than Hil. 

 

Of course.  twa already threw up that trial balloon on here.  :) 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

Yeah, but you have an awful large number of Rs who have been defendig Trump against these allegations. You think Pence will look good if Trump goes down? It would be a major hit to the party.

 

These allegations differ from the charges filed.

 

If the separate allegations that Trump was involved are true then certainly it would be a major hit.....not near that point yet.

 

Will you join me in lobbying for Cruz as VP if Trump goes down and Pence is involved? :ols: (maybe we can then indict Pence and I'll have my choice as POTUS)

 

at least I will be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Right. 

 

Trump blameless. 

Republician obstructionist innocent. 

Hillary guilty. 

 

Seriously, how many shovels have you worn out, over the years?  

 

I have never declared Trump blameless....I do need proof to support removing a elected official though

What obstructionists?....the ones that voted for appointing Mueller?

 

Ya damn right she is guilty,along with the DNC, for enabling this mess.

She (and the DNC) exposed herself to intrusion despite clear warnings.

 

because they value privacy over security

25 minutes ago, Predicto said:

 

Of course.  twa already threw up that trial balloon on here.  :) 

 

Did you ever notice how many of mine get used later?

Someone should owe me royalties or such......know a good lawyer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tshile

tshile

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

ANYTHING to divert votes from Hillary...where are our resident Berners anyways?

Remember when we said ya’ll were being duped....

 

 

 

Hillary was a terrible candidate that somehow lost to a worse candidate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SoulSkin

SoulSkin

Posted
Posted

Not even a tiny little condemnation, warning, or reassurances that it is taken seriously from the WH or 45 for this. Just a weak statement saying he's glad 'cause "No Collusion", followed by a misleading timeline tweet doubling down on "No Collusion". Shocker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...