techboy Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Switchgear said: It's trolling to ask Trump voters to say they disapprove the job he's doing as President if he shoots someone? No matter how much you like someone, no matter how good a job you think they're doing, murder moves the needle to 'not doing a good job', right? Am I taking crazy pills? Here's the actual question: "If Donald Trump shot someone on 5th Avenue, would you approve or disapprove of the job he’s doing as President?" If they really wanted to know if people would care if Trump shot someone on 5th Avenue, the question should have been worded something like: "Would it change your opinion of President Trump if he shot someone on 5th Avenue"? The way it's worded is intentionally written to elicit bigger numbers of people that supposedly don't care, for a number of reasons, mostly because the two parts of the question aren't really connected. They're two separate thoughts... This leads to various problems: 1. As a teacher, I can tell you that many people don't read or listen to an entire question. They just answer the part they happen to catch, usually the last bit. I guarantee a lot of the favorables came from people that were only heard/read the "approve of the job he's doing as President?" 2. Some people probably separated the action from the job as president, like "well, he should be impeached for murder, but I like the job otherwise". It's a weird question. How else do you think that 26% of Trump voters were "unsure"? What sense does that make? How are only 90% of Clinton voters on disapprove? 10% aren't sure if Trump committing murder would make them approve of him or not? 17% of voters for the Libertarian candidate would approve? They're THAT anti-government? Come on. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 We're afraid he might say what's actually going on by accident. ~Bannon 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Mootch taking Trump's "no one knows who hacked the DNC" line. God these people make me sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 minute ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Mootch taking Trump's "no one knows who hacked the DNC" line. God these people make me sick. There's some serious golf on TV. Let it go for a couple hours. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 (edited) Edited July 23, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isifhan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, visionary said: Why the hell does counsel have any say in how long someone needs to testify before the panel? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Well, they can get up and leave anytime. Compare to Hillary testifying in open session for over eleven hours. These guys are cowards. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I'm tellin' ya...it's gonna soon be time for my favorite Trump Administration word..."subpoena". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 48 minutes ago, Isifhan said: Why the hell does counsel have any say in how long someone needs to testify before the panel? I hate that you won't be home to inspect your dry cleaning, massa. (That's why.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I really hope y'all caught Jake Tapper talking to "Mooch" this morning, the play of expressions on his face spoke volumes (ie. contempt, disgust, incredulity, etc.) I swear I have seen "Mooch" on Law n Order defending mobsters against Jack McCoy................. he's right out of central casting 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Yeah, as alluded to in Visionary's post above it seems pretty obvious that Putin convinced Trump that if Russia hacked the DNC our intelligence agencies would have no way of knowing. Unreal. And I do wonder what middle America thinks about Trump having a Wall Street douchebag as communications director. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 (edited) I just watched some of the Mooch's introductory presser. I have no idea why people were saying nice things. Yeah, he's smooth and charismatic. He's a shameless shill though. The expressions of fealty were seemingly endless... "Trump is the smartest. Trump is the best athlete. Trump is the most savvy. The world turns to Trump. I love him (about 30 times)." I'm paraphrasing some of this but I'm not making it up. This is stuff he actually said. Whether you're getting fooled by Spicer & Trump or you're getting fooled by Mooch, you're still a damn fool. Edited July 23, 2017 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I just watched some of the Mooch's introductory presser. I have no idea why people were saying nice things. Yeah, he's smooth and charismatic. He's a shameless shill though. The expressions of fealty were seemingly endless... "Trump is the smartest. Trump is the best athlete. Trump is the most savvy. The world turns to Trump. I love him (about 30 times)." I'm paraphrasing some of this but I'm not making it up. This is stuff he actually said. "And kill the Malaysian Prime Minister!" #relax 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I heard KellyAnne this morning spinning a whole new narrative on talk shows. Her new pitch is that voting machines and ballots weren't tampered with so who cares? Interesting evolution from the days of "we had no contact with Russians". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 So no voter fraud then. cool! ~Bang 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, Bang said: So no voter fraud then. cool! ~Bang You know, to me, this is the most damaging things that the republicans can do to our country. They, through several methods, have tried to question the legitimacy of our own domestic elections. Elections that a large segment of the voting base does not believe are without failure will ultimately undermine our democracy. Safe, accurate and inclusive elections are mandatory for our country to continue to succeed. I think the republican strategy to undermine our own elections is a much bigger problem than we realize. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, RedskinsFan44 said: Yeah, as alluded to in Visionary's post above it seems pretty obvious that Putin convinced Trump that if Russia hacked the DNC our intelligence agencies would have no way of knowing. Unreal. And I do wonder what middle America thinks about Trump having a Wall Street douchebag as communications director. Only a fool like Trump would believe Putin over his own intelligence community. He must have looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul. It's pretty amazing that less than half of the voters truly elected the Manchurian candidate. We have a Russian agent sitting in the Oval Office and still only 1:8 of his voters say they would have changed their vote. But yeah, we're just sour about the election results. You Trump voters were thought to be fools...and they bet right. Edited July 23, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 (edited) Will not be under oath....are you ****ing kidding. Trump et al indeed do have the biggest balls in DC. The rest of these spineless whelps are truly Trump's ****es. When Jr and Manafort lie to Congress Trump et al and their mouth breathing voters will scream "yeah but he wasn't under oath!" Edited July 23, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 lol testimony not under oath. what the **** good is that? this country is a ****ing joke. ~Bang 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 5 minutes ago, Bang said: lol testimony not under oath. what the **** good is that? this country is a ****ing joke. ~Bang 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 So if it's all the same then why not swear them in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 8 minutes ago, skinsfan_1215 said: Dubya & Co. all over again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now