Zguy28 Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 5 minutes ago, LD0506 said: Yet The operative word missing here is "yet". Its a soft purge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo the kKklown Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Zguy28 said: That's a really alarming turn. A slippery slope to abuse in order to get rid of undesirables since they can't just purge them. I know people don't like discussing race, but this task force is in line with trying to make America very white again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, Zguy28 said: Its a soft purge. Soooo, purgette? Demi-purge? New Purge Lite with half the gluten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 1 hour ago, LD0506 said: Soooo, purgette? Demi-purge? New Purge Lite with half the gluten? Something like that. "If we can't kill them, let's strip away their citizenship and dump them over the wall. Just as good." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 2 hours ago, Zguy28 said: Its a soft purge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 (edited) Legal immigrants, illegal immigrants? **** em all, right? "Just as they would if they were standing on your front lawn." Edited July 5, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 Judges is quotation marks? Now I'm sure anytime Trump brings up law and order he's talking about the one on NBC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 13 minutes ago, visionary said: Legal immigrants, illegal immigrants? **** em all, right? "Just as they would if they were standing on your front lawn." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 (edited) Edited July 5, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 5 hours ago, Zguy28 said: That's a really alarming turn. A slippery slope to abuse in order to get rid of undesirables since they can't just purge them. I read the article and it seems short on details. What grounds are they using to attempt to strip them? We have a history of stripping people of citizenship when it was found out they were Nazi's that committed war crimes so it isn't exactly without precedent. Now I assume this administration isn't using that high bar and honestly, are probably doing it for little more than the color of their skin. But you need to give me some details before I get up in arms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 1 minute ago, TheGreatBuzz said: I read the article and it seems short on details. What grounds are they using to attempt to strip them? We have a history of stripping people of citizenship when it was found out they were Nazi's that committed war crimes so it isn't exactly without precedent. Now I assume this administration isn't using that high bar and honestly, are probably doing it for little more than the color of their skin. But you need to give me some details before I get up in arms Is that the only article so far making the claim? I'm a little reluctant to believe it yet...though I'm sure the desire from the administration is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 1 minute ago, visionary said: Is that the only article so far making the claim? I'm a little reluctant to believe it yet...though I'm sure the desire from the administration is there. Not sure. I, for the most part, only read the articles posted here. Mostly by you. Thanks btw!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 (edited) Edited July 5, 2018 by Cooked Crack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBoz Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: So they tried to cross the border legally or illegally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Just now, EBoz said: So they tried to cross the border legally or illegally? Click the article. Reading is fundamental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBoz Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Cooked Crack said: Click the article. Reading is fundamental. It doesn’t say. If they attempted to cross illegally that is on the parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, EBoz said: It doesn’t say. If they attempted to cross illegally that is on the parents. Quote Eligible recruits are required to have legal status in the U.S., such as a student visa, before enlisting. More than 5,000 immigrants were recruited into the program in 2016, and an estimated 10,000 are currently serving. Most go the Army, but some also go to the other military branches. Edited July 6, 2018 by Cooked Crack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBoz Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Just now, Cooked Crack said: What’s your point? Did they seek asylum or did they just think they could stroll across our border? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Tomb Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Sorry Burgold, there is nothing wrong with wanting secure borders. It does not make one a crotchety old man. I'm so sick of that argument, as well as the "racist" label just because people want others to follow the law. If you were to go to another country without documentation and expected to stay, you would be detained and sent right back home. Forgive the rant I've just been stewing over this for a while. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 13 minutes ago, EBoz said: What’s your point? Did they seek asylum or did they just think they could stroll across our border? Ah. I think we're talking about two separate tweets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBoz Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 The issue is that there are laws on the books that are very clear. As a veteran, it’s a slap in my face as to how many pander to those crossing ILLEGALLY when there are so many veterans on the streets who deserve way more than people trying to cross our borders illegally. 1 minute ago, Cooked Crack said: Ah. I think we're talking about two separate tweets. Fair enough and I think you are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, EBoz said: The issue is that there are laws on the books that are very clear. So if the law changes tomorrow, you'd change your tune? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBoz Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: So if the law changes tomorrow, you'd change your tune? Not really. As a veteran there is no chance, any person/family crosses our border and reaps the benefits while there are so many homeless veterans on the streets. It’s a no brainer for me. with that being said, there are still laws. What exactly do you disagree with? Edited July 6, 2018 by EBoz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Just now, EBoz said: Not really. As a veteran there is no chance, any person/family crosses our border and reaps the benefits while there are so many homeless veterans on the streets. It’s a no brainer for me. Why bring up the law if it doesn't matter? Laws can be changed. If you don't like an action then talk about that instead of bringing up laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now