Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

I want to sue the republican party for willful denial of scientific evidence about climate change.

Mad Mike

By Mad Mike
in The Tailgate

 Share

Recommended Posts

Burgold

Burgold

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Zguy28 said:

I'm a self-described conservative, but believe climate change is real. However, even the article admits that the example farmer's fallow fields were salted from hurricane Florence. The deniers will latch onto that.

Fair. Although hurricane intensity is well correlated to be impacted by climate change too.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

 

 

Thanks for nuthin' bub, why don't you just sit down and listen for awhile. Might learn sumthin'.

 

obviously not if it resembles that :ols:

 

Shell has spent Billions because it is the price of doing business today in their business model, and some is driven by the sue and settle game the govt set up.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Burgold said:

Fair. Although hurricane intensity is well correlated to be impacted by climate change too.

 

and the sinking of the land.

If only the North was still buried under ice the plate wouldn't be tipping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AsburySkinsFan

AsburySkinsFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, twa said:

 

obviously not if it resembles that :ols:

 

Shell has spent Billions because it is the price of doing business today in their business model, and some is driven by the sue and settle game the govt set up.

 

 

God you really are just a Sally-Say-A-Lot doll, the article posted earlier specifically notes that the billions being spent are on RESEARCH not legal. It's like arguing with a bot that has only so many pre-programmed responses, and when it doesn't have one that fits it gets confused and just brings up a red herring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

God you really are just a Sally-Say-A-Lot doll, the article posted earlier specifically notes that the billions being spent are on RESEARCH not legal. It's like arguing with a bot that has only so many pre-programmed responses, and when it doesn't have one that fits it gets confused and just brings up a red herring.

 

Yes research, which is needed because of increased regulations and limits on emissions.

 

AND much of the research dollars are from agreements made from the sue and settle game and violation settlements.

 

Wanna guess how much research BP had to fund after the Horizon blowout?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stopping-sue-and-settle-1508369052

 

you have no clue

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AsburySkinsFan

AsburySkinsFan

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Yes research, which is needed because of increased regulations and limits on emissions.

 

AND much of the research dollars are from agreements made from the sue and settle game and violation settlements.

 

Wanna guess how much research BP had to fund after the Horizon blowout?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stopping-sue-and-settle-1508369052

 

you have no clue

 

Yawwwwnnnnnn......you keep running around in circles. Go back and read the article on carbon recapture. I'm done doing your homework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
No Excuses

No Excuses

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, twa said:

I've posted more articles on carbon capture/sequestration research/tech than anyone here.

 

 

No you haven't, nor have you ever shown even a middle-school level grasp of knowledge on these issues. Feel free to find yourself on this graph:

 

Dunning%20Kruger%20Chart.jpg?itok=BNNfmc

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skinsmarydu

skinsmarydu

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/4/2019 at 8:18 AM, twa said:

 

and the sinking of the land.

If only the North was still buried under ice the plate wouldn't be tipping.

 

On 3/4/2019 at 2:02 PM, twa said:

 

Yes research, which is needed because of increased regulations and limits on emissions.

 

AND much of the research dollars are from agreements made from the sue and settle game and violation settlements.

 

Wanna guess how much research BP had to fund after the Horizon blowout?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stopping-sue-and-settle-1508369052

 

you have no clue

 

And you need a few. 

Edited by skinsmarydu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
On 3/8/2019 at 12:52 PM, stevemcqueen1 said:

I'm at the point where I think we need a law that makes Climate Change Denial a capital crime punished by two bullets to the back of the head.

 

that tactic does eliminate the opposition, but is not very environmentally conscious.

 

may I suggest a bolt gun?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PeterMP

PeterMP

Posted
Posted

https://www.fastcompany.com/90311509/we-have-to-fix-fashion-if-we-want-to-survive-the-next-century

 

"We have to fix fashion if we want to survive the climate crisis"

 

I just want to use this story to make the point that a lot of time people (especially liberals) get caught up on fixing climate change (and a lot of other problems we face) by introducing new technology (or other new ideas).  Just basic conservation would go along way in helping fixing climate change (and I suspect addressing a lot of other issues).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...