Renegade7 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I still haven't seen a valid argument for why minimum wage should not be at least above the poverty line. $22 an hour to flip burgers is kinda crazy. But with $4 gas and continued rise in cost of living, $10 an hour ($9.80) should not be out the question, imo. In a consumer-driven economy, it just makes sense to me, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endzone_dave Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 People flipping burgers aren't more productive. Walmart greeters aren't more productive. The cleaning help at hotels aren't more productive. People who use technology in their jobs are, but those people are usually making more money anyway. I agree with Renegade, it wouldn't hurt my feelings to see MW raised to $10. Everything is so expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpyaks3 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 People flipping burgers aren't more productive. Walmart greeters aren't more productive. The cleaning help at hotels aren't more productive. People who use technology in their jobs are, but those people are usually making more money anyway.I agree with Renegade, it wouldn't hurt my feelings to see MW raised to $10. Everything is so expensive. Even those groups that you say are more productive aren't seeing their pay raise. Across the board there has been a decoupling of productivity and wages. If you were wondering where that money goes/went Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Warren did NOT say the minimum wage should be $22 per hour. It is annoying to read posts that pretend she said that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Warren did NOT say the minimum wage should be $22 per hour. It is annoying to read posts that pretend she said that. Oh NOW we're going to start having standards in the tailgate.:pfft: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Agreed, Predicto. She didn't. Holy crap, can't find it. But swear, guys, she didn't. IIRC, she said if production had kept up with wages(instead of making 1 person do the work of 5)it might've worked? ---------- Post added March-20th-2013 at 08:14 PM ---------- People flipping burgers aren't more productive. Walmart greeters aren't more productive. The cleaning help at hotels aren't more productive. People who use technology in their jobs are, but those people are usually making more money anyway.I agree with Renegade, it wouldn't hurt my feelings to see MW raised to $10. Everything is so expensive. Thank you. It makes us in the restaurant biz think you give a crap...but I guess those of us who take it seriously somehow pisss you off? Ever had really super service by a 47-year old with memories of the first subway series? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endzone_dave Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Thank you. It makes us in the restaurant biz think you give a crap...but I guess those of us who take it seriously somehow pisss you off? Ever had really super service by a 47-year old with memories of the first subway series? So what do you think minimum wage should be? $10 is fine with me. $14 is fine with me. $22 would be too high in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctorshockalu Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 People flipping burgers aren't more productive. Walmart greeters aren't more productive. The cleaning help at hotels aren't more productive. People who use technology in their jobs are, but those people are usually making more money anyway.I agree with Renegade, it wouldn't hurt my feelings to see MW raised to $10. Everything is so expensive. If we did raise the minimum wage to 10/hour, would you like to see the companies increase their products price or cut a few employees to make this feasible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 If we did raise the minimum wage to 10/hour, would you like to see the companies increase their products price or cut a few employees to make this feasible? The awful thing about it that is there's a good chance that will happen even though most of the corporations don't need to do that. And there's nothing we can do about it because that's just capitalism. Capitalism isn't the problem here, greed is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 If we did raise the minimum wage to 10/hour, would you like to see the companies increase their products price or cut a few employees to make this feasible? They'll have to do the former. If they could make widgets with fewer employees, they'd already be doing it. Which doesn't mean that there won't be any downward pressure on employment. There will be. And no doubt some of "well, now that the price has gone up, that automated widget that wasn't cost justifiable, now is". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexey Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 How about we lower the maximum wage instead (just kidding, please don't accuse me of communism :paranoid:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 You might be on to something, alexey. Floor and ceiling limits on wages... probably worth discussing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMS Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 $22/hr if full time is a $44,000/yr job. There are plenty of college graduates in professional settings who are making about that much, and okay with it. And it's well above the poverty line. Min wage shouldn't be anywhere near that. I'm less interested in "productivity" (how does one measure the productivity of a fast food worker or something anyway?) or in how much the wages of the 1% have increased, than what it would be if it had simply kept up with inflation. The poverty line in the United States in 2012 was $23,021. I don't have any problem with jobs paying a liveable wage, above the poverty line. I also look at the economy and how it's changed over my lifetime and have never once thought our problem was wealth is too concentrated in the poor. In General when you leave the minimum wage stagnant for decades, you should expect significant adjustments like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 How about we lower the maximum wage instead It's not necessary as the taxation is so repressive at higher levels of earning that there is an effective maximum wage because no-one wants to work and take home so little of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulane Skins Fan Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 It's not necessary as the taxation is so repressive at higher levels of earning that there is an effective maximum wage because no-one wants to work and take home so little of it. That's funny. What's the maximum wage that people can make? The effective tax rate is flat for the top 10% http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/01/18/us/effective-income-tax-rates.html?_r=0 see the middle column. In fact, the top 1% pay a lower effective tax rate than the top 5% and the top 10%. So, it pays off in taxes to make more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 It's not necessary as the taxation is so repressive at higher levels of earning that there is an effective maximum wage because no-one wants to work and take home so little of it. Looking for sarcasm tags. Not seeing any. Walking away, shaking head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Looking for sarcasm tags. Not seeing any. Walking away, shaking head. Sarcasm tags were needed? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bliz Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Sarcasm tags were needed? Really? LOL I thought you were just paraphrasing Phil Mickelson. Poor ole' Lefty. It's really, truly sad how much he has to pay in taxes. <sarcasm tag> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeluCopter29 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I mean..... she's right. That's the thing about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 It's funny how my opinions about socialism and libertarianism have changed over the last 7 years. Basically flip flopping, but frustrated by the ability of the American people to over look selfishness and not condone greed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 If people were actually paid minimum wage adjusted for inflation, there would be even more tax revenue, because minimum wage workers pay taxes on 100% of their income, less any deductions. They would be more likely to own homes, increasing the real estate tax base. Ceding higher profits to the 1% on the backs of minimum wage labor is real wealth redistribution in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsluggo Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Sarcasm tags were needed? Really? you are probably right... it was such a thighslappingly ridiculous statement on its face that no tagging was needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 you are probably right... it was such a thighslappingly ridiculous statement on its face that no tagging was needed I absolutely believe he was serious. He's just lying now to look better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsluggo Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 to his credit, or detriment, I don't think he has backed off from his original position. (in spite of the absurdity of that postion) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjTj Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 LOLI thought you were just paraphrasing Phil Mickelson. Poor ole' Lefty. It's really, truly sad how much he has to pay in taxes. <sarcasm tag> The PGA should really start thinking about a cap on yearly earnings. We have a salary cap in the NFL, NBA, and NHL, and it has made all of those sports better and more competitive. Why not an earnings cap in golf? After Tiger wins two majors, he should have to sit out the rest of the year. How else are small-market players supposed to compete? The rich just keep getting richer, with better shoes, better clubs, and better training. Let someone else win, already! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.