China Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Long arms, not cleavage, make women irresistable to men London (ANI) - Cleavage revealing shirts, short skirts and high heels might not really work if you want to catch your man's attention, for if you want him to go weak in his knees show off a bit of arm, says a new study. Long, shapely arms, sported by the likes of Christine Bleakley, Madonna or Courtney Cox, are considered more attractive than endless legs, a study has found. The finding came after experts at the University of New South Wales, Sydney conducted tests on Australian and Chinese men and women. During the research, volunteers were asked to watch videos of 96 women aged between 20 and 49 and then to rate each one according to her looks. Results showed that 'long-armed women' were consistently considered the most attractive. Hip and waist size were also regarded as important, along with a woman's weight and age, but the length of her leg 'did not contribute significantly to the ratings'. Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuckinIA Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Umm, wrong. Her arms were not the first thing I noticed in that picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrifNick21 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Umm, wrong. Her arms were not the first thing I noticed in that picture. Me either. What kind of flowers are those? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolmConnection Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Me either. What kind of flowers are those? LOL. Zing. They picked a TERRIBLE picture to prove their point. SUUUURE I like girls with toned arms, but they all better have racks like that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 Hmmm... Um, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan133 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Umm, wrong. Her arms were not the first thing I noticed in that picture. So I wasn't the only one who noticed that nice head of hair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKSkinsFan Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I just enjoyed the fact that she seems genuinely happy with her body in that pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolmConnection Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Hmmm... Um, no. What's the problem? I wouldn't even notice if she HAD arms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botched Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 So why don't I want to bang Ann Coulter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 So why don't I want to bang Ann Coulter? Because she's a lycanthrope? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticksboi05 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 My eyes did not go to her arms when I saw that picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjah Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 So why don't I want to bang Ann Coulter? The study reached no conclusions about horses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Meh, I'm more of a legs kind of guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostofSparta Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Couldn't tell you how long the arms of my wife and all my ex's are, but I could tell you their cup sizes. (No, I won't, so don't ask :pfft:) I think "long arms" ranks somewhere in the range of shoe size. You only really notice if there's something that makes them abnormal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Skins_&_'Stons Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 /THREAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botched Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Because she's a lycanthrope? Best possible answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Skins_&_'Stons Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 One more... Now /THREAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Australian and Chinese men have lost their minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I cant make up my mind which is more stupid. That they wasted time on this "study", or they were too brain dead to notice the correlation between long arms and an over-all slim body type. Never mind... Source: Indiavision News Brokks said it showed how some features were important to evolution. But it was the overall look, which mattered most. Duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 One more... Now /THREAD OK. What the hell was I talking about? I completely lost my train of thought. I may have to bookmark this thread for later. :paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINS@THEGOALLINE Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Tell them that at "Hooter's" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I mean arms are hardly the first thing I notice but they definitely factor in. I could never date a chick with big/fat/jiggly arms. I also got a theory that chicks with big/fat/jiggly arms are destined to one day be fat. I seen too many dudes with wives who became fat after marriage to take that risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polywog999 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I mean arms are hardly the first thing I notice but they definitely factor in. I could never date a chick with big/fat/jiggly arms. I also got a theory that chicks with big/fat/jiggly arms are destined to one day be fat. I seen too many dudes with wives who became fat after marriage to take that risk. Thats how I like em. Short arms are cute! Plump chicks rock! Other guys can date the high maintenance Barbie doll types...I'll take the woman any day, who is happy to have me be her man. You learn a thing or two about women by the time you get to be an old fogie like me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Just for fun, there was a time I was doing a piece on some pro ice skaters. I remember one coming in and couldn't stop staring at her arms. They were just gorgeous... it didn't hurt that the rest of her was fantastic too... but there was something about the shape, the taper, and the tone that was intoxicating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think there is some truth to this. What we notice subconsciously may not be the same as what we notice with our conscious mind. Arms are usually visible, and lean, toned arms demonstrate health and vitality at a glance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.