endzone_dave Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I thought it was a decent read, I'd give it a 4 out of 5. I could have given it a 5 out of 5 but Rand spent an extra 300 pages trying to hammer her point across which she didn't have to do. The long radio sermon by Galt at the end was tough to get through. Rand would have mixed feelings if she lived today. She was afraid that government would control big business but big business controls government - she'd be happy about that. CEOs are getting paid higher than ever, she'd love that too. She'd hate how our government has to be everything to everyone (I'd agree with her). Distributing the wealth and accumulating massive debts to give money to the "needy". The book got pretty predictable too. How many times is Francisco going to come in at the last minute to save the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Predicto shrugged and went to a different thread. (Nothing personal to you, but Ayn Rand makes me feel nauseous) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metalhead Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I just started it...half way through chapter 4 lol. It's going to take me a while, plus I'm reading two other books right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbear Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I can't make myself read it. I read the Fountain Head because I wanted a better understanding of the life lived by philosiphy so different from my own. I cringed reading the book, because it was like spending time with characters for whom I couldn't bring myself to chear while they were trying to do something I could care less about. It was like Seinfeld with the humor. That said, I have thought more about that book than all but a handful of other books. It was worth sludging my way through, but I can't make myself go back for seconds with Atlas Shrugged. I have been told the characters in Atlas shrugged were not as 2 dimensional. Is that true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I've always wanted to read Atlas Shrugged. I'm currently reading many of the books that were slipped into scenes of the television show LOST and damn, are there a lot of them. Just finished reading VALIS which is quite an unusual story. Currently, I've read a large chunk of Ulysses and to be honest with you, I'm probably gonna give up on it. It's bizarre and not keeping my atttention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 In my econ class, we skipped Galt's speech. I kinda enjoyed the book. One thing about Rand: For better or worse, you do NOT have to hurt your brain trying to figure out her points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Just play Bioshock on Xbox 360. It's a lot more fun and you get to kill things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 In my econ class, we skipped Galt's speech. I kinda enjoyed the book. One thing about Rand: For better or worse, you do NOT have to hurt your brain trying to figure out her points Heck you don't even have to USE your brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Predicto shruggedand went to a different thread. (Nothing personal to you, but Ayn Rand makes me feel nauseous) I'm pretty sure that Ayn might have the same feelings of you too. Of course nothing personal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I've always wanted to read Atlas Shrugged. You should if for nothing else you can discuss it with others. At the LOC (Library of Congress) AS is second only to the bible in the most requested book. It's worth you time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Snydershrugged in 3...2...1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacase Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I enjoyed it, there were parts that I just skipped because they were to damn long and boring, but I enjoyed the theme of the book, its kinda of funny to see things she describes happening now, but of course if you are a liberal *cough* Perdicto *Cough* then you will hate both the book and Rand. She had some pretty far out there ideas and took some things to whole new levels, but the core of what she is saying I believe in. Atlas Shrugged is like a more indepth version of Fountainhead, she really started to flesh out here ideas in Atlas Shrugged. I think I will have to pull that off my bookshelf and crack it open again tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenspandan Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 bleah. it's a thousand pages of fictional people acting mega-unrealistically through contrived situations in order to illustrate her ultra-simplistic view of how the real world works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 bleah.it's a thousand pages of fictional people acting mega-unrealistically through contrived situations in order to illustrate her ultra-simplistic view of how the real world works. EXACTLY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Rand nailed economics; the rest of Objectivism not so much. And she didn't care much for libertarians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I'm looking forward to checking AS out as soon as I get my library card back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 I thought it was a decent read, I'd give it a 4 out of 5. I could have given it a 5 out of 5 but Rand spent an extra 300 pages trying to hammer her point across which she didn't have to do. The long radio sermon by Galt at the end was tough to get through.Rand would have mixed feelings if she lived today. She was afraid that government would control big business but big business controls government - she'd be happy about that. CEOs are getting paid higher than ever, she'd love that too. She'd hate how our government has to be everything to everyone (I'd agree with her). Distributing the wealth and accumulating massive debts to give money to the "needy". The book got pretty predictable too. How many times is Francisco going to come in at the last minute to save the day. You'd have to be blind not to see that GOVERNMENT CONTROLS BUSINESS today. Heck, why do you think so many businesses bend over to take the government's dry stick up their ass instead of doing the socially responsible thing and maximize profit? One element the book is talking about is called economic capture and a major aspect of that is today called privatization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techboy Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 And she didn't care much for libertarians. As near as I can tell, she didn't care much for anybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endzone_dave Posted July 28, 2010 Author Share Posted July 28, 2010 As near as I can tell, she didn't care much for anybody. She liked perfect people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 I thought it was a decent read, I'd give it a 4 out of 5. I could have given it a 5 out of 5 but Rand spent an extra 300 pages trying to hammer her point across which she didn't have to do. The long radio sermon by Galt at the end was tough to get through.Rand would have mixed feelings if she lived today. She was afraid that government would control big business but big business controls government - she'd be happy about that. CEOs are getting paid higher than ever, she'd love that too. She'd hate how our government has to be everything to everyone (I'd agree with her). Distributing the wealth and accumulating massive debts to give money to the "needy". The book got pretty predictable too. How many times is Francisco going to come in at the last minute to save the day. I liked the book As a high schooler I found it persuasive (became a full blown libertarian for a while) now i'm just mad that I was dumb enough to be that naive I actually still think its a good book, but not as any sort of philosophy or poli sci lesson She liked perfect people. perfect sociopaths maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoot Point Really Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 now i'm just mad that I was dumb enough to be that naive You are only 23... In 10 years, you'll change your mind 5 times at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 You are only 23... In 10 years, you'll change your mind 5 times at least. So true. I'm NOTHING like I was 10 years ago. In fact, I'd probably yell at my 23 yr old self to, "Get off my lawn, you damn kid!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Pablo Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 Ayn Rand = Stephenie Meyer. The only difference being that corporations are substituted for vampires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 Ayn Rand = Stephenie Meyer. The only difference being that corporations are substituted for vampires.:tantrum: How DARE you insult Rand like that. NOTHING is as bad as sparkly emo-pussified "vampires" who stalk those they love :cuss: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desioreo87 Posted July 29, 2010 Share Posted July 29, 2010 She'd hate how our government has to be everything to everyone (I'd agree with her). Distributing the wealth and accumulating massive debts to give money to the "needy". yea, cause what a ****ing disgrace that is. O, those people with no money, born into ****ed up situations, yea they don't need any help. They'll be just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.