TK Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 E-Dog Nice find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Do whatever you want. The harsh reality is I'll always have some Redskin player by name. And that hurts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WallyG3 Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Do whatever you want. The harsh reality is I'll always have some Redskin player by name. And that hurts Awwwww. :violin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Do whatever you want. The harsh reality is I'll always have some Redskin player by name. And that hurts Pick one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Pick one. Birdman of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Ain't no spell checker in Photoshop. yes there is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armstrong001 Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Do whatever you want. The harsh reality is I'll always have some Redskin player by name. And that hurts Keep posting. Eventually you can get Sonny Jurgensen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 yes there is Not at 3am when I'm out of caffine, there isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 I like the idea. I do have a suggestion though. What if you made it possible to use any of your past avatars once you escalate to a new level. For example, I am a Springs fan and I was bummedwhen I was no longer able to use him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DOOG Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 TK - I think its a great idea, and from a newer person to the boards, the time thing would make a lot of sense. I would like to see a few more options in the lower and mid range levels. There are been alot of suggestions in other threads about possibly tying in post counts/limits and such into avatars and i think it would encourage the newbies to do things right and reward them at the same time. Kinda stinks if you are reading threads and posting they way you are supposed to and you can only pick from one avatar once you get to the next level. :2cents: And whoever suggested the older redskins like Shuler or Westbrook...that would be kinda cool too..especially at the lower levels..Id rather have that than a "waterboy".....uh...i think:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Worthy Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Very nice. Lets get some more in!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Nutsack. I am at 4030 and hoping to get to the 5000 goal and the special avatar. I'm beat. lol :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Yes.Guy, I'm talking about adding 7 additional levels. As it stands now, to do that, you'd burn through avavars without ever knowing you'd moved up 3 levels. Hence the need to raise the 5,000 limit. OK, OK...I wasnt sure exactly how many levels you had in mind. Thats a lot! Sounds pretty cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 more options would be cool. it spices things up a bit. but i think the variety should increase as your count goes up. for instance, franchise players have more to choose from than starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 More is better. I don't know why I only have one choice at my current level, as I seemed to have more before. I also don't know why I can't opt to have have no avatar. I can do it, but the next time I log in it gives it back to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted April 2, 2006 Author Share Posted April 2, 2006 More is better. I don't know why I only have one choice at my current level, as I seemed to have more before. Might be because Marcus Washington was the only Pro Bowler last year when the current avatars were set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jofizz Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I'm all for this idea. I think raising the ring of fame to 10,000 posts is a great idea. It will make the group much more prestigous. And the idea of adding on additional avatars will give users more options. Huge plus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I have no idea what my current post count is. Nor do I care. I like the tenure idea,however if I am sitting at Xs post now, would I need to reach 10K-15K posts to move to the next level from that point ? More curious than anything. My fear still lies with random post padding. I may make an occasional post that may or may not be considered pointless (for example in the congrats Jumbo thread). But for the most part I believe that I try to make posts, on topic and to further the discussion of the thread. Thanks, S&T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I vote, Yay. The more the merrier as far as I am concerned. 5,000 posts seems so small when you are on this site everyday, hours at a time. I would love for the ring of fame level be raised. Sure, it may take me a couple years to enter the ROF but, thats ok in my book. It will just keep me focused and interested on this board even longer. As far as the tenure idea, I think its great. Not everybody can be on this site and post hours at a time, so why shouldn't they experience the thrill in receiving a new avatar when they have been here for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrollsMine99 Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Additional avatar options would be fine with me. Perhaps you could offer some of the new Redskin additions among the options? CarrollsMine99. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalSkinsFan Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I voted nay under the current conditions. If tenure were factored in I would vote yay. It just seems to me that adding more options and levels would only encourage the spam posting, which is the only thing I don't care for on these boards. Any thread that is more than 2 pages long I rarely even bother with :2cents: . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the burgundy and gold Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 the more avatars the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernSkinsFan Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I like the more is better idea, but I'm very much in agreement with HOF, autograph, and Orenthal Mark about 'ciphering some way to include length of time on the board in with the number of posts. I tend to read more and post only when I have something to contribute (even if I am being a smarty-pants). Reading more and posting less is actually something I wish A LOT of new posters would consider doing. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 I vote yes, even though at my posting pace, I'd have to wait until I'm 60 to get into the ROF. :sigh: I don't mind as long as you add more avatars and levels of post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 What if you had to be voted into the Ring of Fame? Just an idea. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.