CapsSkins Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I think three. Right now we are up two games. If we only get two stars and England gets four, I think they beat us by virtue of the head to head tiebreaker. But even before the Steelers won we were ahead of NE by a hair. So wouldn't again be the case in the 2 vs 4 star scenario? Is there a place to check the backup data / methodology? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Just now, CapsSkins said: But even before the Steelers won we were ahead of NE by a hair. I don’t understand how that worked. There’s 17 opponents and each of them has 17 opponents so there’s only 289 games that factor into strength of schedule. Somehow, tank-athon had us at a difference that was worth like 3/100ths of a percent. I might be missing something but that sure doesn’t seem right to me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chump Bailey Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 20 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: When one asshat leaves there is ALWAYS another to take his place. No shortage of asshats I concur 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 3 minutes ago, CapsSkins said: But even before the Steelers won we were ahead of NE by a hair. So wouldn't again be the case in the 2 vs 4 star scenario? Is there a place to check the backup data / methodology? Pretty sure he's right. The percentage was less than a game I believe right now the teams on our schedule have 140 Ws and New England's have 141. Will have to double check later. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapsSkins Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 3 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I don’t understand how that worked. There’s 17 opponents and each of them has 17 opponents so there’s only 289 games that factor into strength of schedule. Somehow, tank-athon had us at a difference that was worth like 3/100ths of a percent. I might be missing something but that sure doesn’t seem right to me. 14 opponents but yeah. Would appreciate if Tankathon showed their backup calcs somewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 7 minutes ago, mh86 said: I feel as though all this qb talk that’s making me scroll through pages upon pages could be in the draft thread You'll be alright. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I don’t understand how that worked. There’s 17 opponents and each of them has 17 opponents so there’s only 289 games that factor into strength of schedule. Somehow, tank-athon had us at a difference that was worth like 3/100ths of a percent. I might be missing something but that sure doesn’t seem right to me. It's becuase, for example, Denver is on both of our schedules. So that game effected theirs by two games (both LA and Denver on theirs) but only one on ours (Denver). Basically the opponents of each team hadn't played the same number of games at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 I aint sweatin it Pats will beat the Jets next week 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, CapsSkins said: 14 opponents but yeah. Would appreciate if Tankathon showed their backup calcs somewhere Yeah, with three of them counted twice if we really need to be that technical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhd24 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Just now, Warhead36 said: I aint sweatin it Pats will beat the Jets next week Nah, I think Kraft will order the code red. Giants are. going to get crushed by Philly. They'll leapfrog NE if the Pats win. No way will NE want to fall to 5 with a glaring hole at QB. Saints beating Atlanta is the biggest game next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, mhd24 said: Nah, I think Kraft will order the code red. Giants are. going to get crushed by Philly. They'll leapfrog NE if the Pats win. No way will NE want to fall to 5 with a glaring hole at QB. Saints beating Atlanta is the biggest game next week. It's not up to him. It's up to Belichick, who likely won't be around to use the pick and is chasing the all time Ws record. He ain't tanking. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapsSkins Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 minutes ago, Rufus T Firefly said: Yeah, with three of them counted twice if we really need to be that technical. Right, right. 14 unique opponents with the divisional opponents' records weighted twice to reflect two games played against each. I'll run the #'s in a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 minutes ago, mhd24 said: Saints beating Atlanta is the biggest game next week. Taylor Heinicke gets the last laugh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Just now, CapsSkins said: Right, right. 14 unique opponents with the divisional opponents' records weighted twice to reflect two games played against each. I'll run the #'s in a bit Again, pretty sure there are 140 Ws from our opponents, 141 from theirs. If we tie, they win the second leg of the tiebreaker. So we need 3 of 6 to go our way to keep the stats quo. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumplestilskin Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 4 minutes ago, mhd24 said: Nah, I think Kraft will order the code red. Giants are. going to get crushed by Philly. They'll leapfrog NE if the Pats win. No way will NE want to fall to 5 with a glaring hole at QB. Saints beating Atlanta is the biggest game next week. Heiny better be throwing ints and fumbling for pylons. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, Rufus T Firefly said: Again, pretty sure there are 140 Ws from our opponents, 141 from theirs. If we tie, they win the second leg of the tiebreaker. So we need 3 of 6 to go our way to keep the stats quo. Thanks for all the legwork all of you guys are doing in here. I have no idea how to calculate this ****. Appreciate you all. 4 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Just now, rumplestilskin said: Heiny better be throwing ints and fumbling for pylons. Seems like he was pretty horrible today. 10/29 3 INTs, I believe. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 3 hours ago, Drock_VB said: That’s what I’m thinking. This team has needs all over. Why pick a QB when you can’t protect him? It’s a recipe for disaster. We need picks, picks , and more picks. there are no guarantees with any player in the draft. It’s a numbers game. Health, injury, personal problems, failures to play up to status….. anything can happen. Load up on picks , Scout well , draft for needs, and see what you got at the end of the year. Uh, you don’t go anywhere without a qb. The o-line will be addressed in the later rounds and free agency. Also, we probably are trading a player or two for more picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, Rufus T Firefly said: Seems like he was pretty horrible today. 10/29 3 INTs, I believe. He was benched for Ridder bad. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chump Bailey Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 minutes ago, KDawg said: Thanks for all the legwork all of you guys are doing in here. I have no idea how to calculate this ****. Appreciate you all. Second that - this stuff makes my eyes glaze over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 minutes ago, KDawg said: Thanks for all the legwork all of you guys are doing in here. I have no idea how to calculate this ****. Appreciate you all. You can't add Ws? Man, you're dumber than I thought. (and that is REALLY saying something) 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 5 minutes ago, Rufus T Firefly said: You can't add Ws? Man, you're dumber than I thought. (and that is REALLY saying something) I sure can. WWWWWWWW But they all just look like skinny V’s now. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, Rufus T Firefly said: He's mediocre. Can't guarantee what any team will do, or how they evaluate the QBs in the class. But as Conn said, you don't pass on a blue chip QB when you have a chance at one. If they think Williams, or even Maye, is anywhere near as good as the hype, it would be incredibly stupid to pass on that because Fields has a chance to be an average starter. Bears are retaining Eberflus. They are full of stupid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyst Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Why do people think Pats are going to fire their coach. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now