Cooked Crack Posted October 17, 2022 Author Share Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) Cringe sexts. Language warning. Spoiler Edited October 17, 2022 by Cooked Crack 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) Kellye really wants the one eyed monster. Ahem. Edited October 17, 2022 by The Evil Genius 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 Kell-ye So-Relle. What ****ing language is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 3 hours ago, TradeTheBeal! said: Kell-ye So-Relle. What ****ing language is this? Seditionary. 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbear Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 Seditionary...is that some new fangled code for ye old "missionary?" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 1 hour ago, gbear said: Seditionary...is that some new fangled code for ye old "missionary?" Nah, it's what the q klan seditionists speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Well, she's married with kids. Party of family values. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Does her husband find out? I’m guessing he has to somehow have read about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 48 minutes ago, tshile said: Does her husband find out? I’m guessing he has to somehow have read about it? Maybe he's just like Jerry Falwell, Jr. and just likes to watch. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 15 hours ago, gbear said: Seditionary...is that some new fangled code for ye old "missionary?" It's missionary position but wearing white sheets instead of being on them. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 23 minutes ago, mistertim said: It's missionary position but wearing white sheets instead of being on them. I hate you 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Photostat? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) Re: Windom: The Man Helping Drive the Investigation Into Trump’s Push to Keep Power Thomas Windom, a little-known federal prosecutor, is overseeing key elements of the Justice Department’s intensifying investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Click on the link for the full article Edited October 18, 2022 by China 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 32 minutes ago, China said: Photostat? LOL What year is it? But the best part is he tells someone who is recording him not to tell anyone... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Trump in line at the post office. 👴🏻 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 In Documents Review, Special Master Tells Trump Team to Back Up Privilege Claims The special master reviewing materials seized by the F.B.I. from former President Donald J. Trump’s compound in Florida expressed skepticism on Tuesday about early claims by Mr. Trump’s lawyers that certain documents were privileged and thus could be withheld from a Justice Department investigation. In a phone conference, the special master, Judge Raymond J. Dearie of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, complained that the log of an initial batch of documents over which Mr. Trump is seeking to claim privilege lacked sufficient information to determine whether the arguments were valid. Judge Dearie encouraged Mr. Trump’s lawyers to give him a better sense of why they believed the documents could be lawfully shielded from the Justice Department’s inquiry into whether Mr. Trump unlawfully kept classified records at his estate and obstructed the government’s repeated efforts to retrieve them. “It’s a little perplexing as I go through the log,” Judge Dearie said. “What’s the expression — ‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef.” The hearing was the latest step in the review process that began last month when Judge Dearie was named special master by one of Mr. Trump’s appointees, Judge Aileen M. Cannon of the Southern District of Florida. Click on the link for the full article 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 Actions have consequences, and somebody doesn't like theirs: Trump ally Clark asks U.S. court to block disciplinary charges against him Former Justice Department attorney Jeffrey Bossert Clark asked a federal court on Monday to intervene in a legal disciplinary case pending against him over his efforts to help former President Donald Trump overturn his 2020 election loss. In his lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Clark argues that the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the local bodies of the D.C. Bar responsible for filing and adjudicating disciplinary proceedings against attorneys do not have the jurisdiction to bring ethics charges against him. Clark, who previously led the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division and temporarily led the Civil Division, argues that "no state possesses the power to supervise the internal operations and deliberations of any branch of the federal government." The ethics case against him, the lawsuit says, represents a "direct attack on the fundamental principle of separation of powers." Hamilton "Phil" Fox, the head of the office that brought the ethics charges, declined to immediately comment on the lawsuit, but said he does not believe that any of the D.C. Bar's disciplinary cases have ever been removed to federal court. The litigation from Clark is his latest maneuver to beat back ethics charges stemming from his efforts while at the Justice Department to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Click on the link for the full article 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 13 hours ago, China said: Actions have consequences, and somebody doesn't like theirs: Trump ally Clark asks U.S. court to block disciplinary charges against him Former Justice Department attorney Jeffrey Bossert Clark asked a federal court on Monday to intervene in a legal disciplinary case pending against him over his efforts to help former President Donald Trump overturn his 2020 election loss. In his lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Clark argues that the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the local bodies of the D.C. Bar responsible for filing and adjudicating disciplinary proceedings against attorneys do not have the jurisdiction to bring ethics charges against him. Clark, who previously led the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division and temporarily led the Civil Division, argues that "no state possesses the power to supervise the internal operations and deliberations of any branch of the federal government." The ethics case against him, the lawsuit says, represents a "direct attack on the fundamental principle of separation of powers." Hamilton "Phil" Fox, the head of the office that brought the ethics charges, declined to immediately comment on the lawsuit, but said he does not believe that any of the D.C. Bar's disciplinary cases have ever been removed to federal court. The litigation from Clark is his latest maneuver to beat back ethics charges stemming from his efforts while at the Justice Department to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Click on the link for the full article This weasel deserves disbarrment due to his participation in the insurrection. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 Sex, guns and sedition: Prosecutors describe Oath Keeper road trip to D.C. Prosecutors on Monday entered the sex, guns and road trip portion of their sprawling seditious conspiracy case against five leaders of the far-right Oath Keepers, presenting a new pile of vivid, granular and, at times, R-rated evidence to the jury. Justice Department attorneys, who have charged Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes and several allies with plotting to forcibly prevent Joe Biden from taking office, reconstructed the group’s movements in the days before Jan. 6, 2021, as members from across the country drove to Washington, D.C., with a massive arsenal of firearms in tow. At the same time, Rhodes was helping amass his own contributions to the Oath Keepers weapons cache, which would later be stashed at an Arlington, Va., Comfort Inn, strategically located to ensure the weapons could be ferried downtown at a moment’s notice. Prosecutors showed messages in which Rhodes negotiated to purchase firearms and other equipment ahead of Jan 6 and drew down bank accounts to the tune of more than $100,000 along the way. In the third week of the government’s case against Rhodes and Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Jessica Watkins, Thomas Caldwell and Kenneth Harrelson, prosecutors are attempting to fill in their extensive evidence about the group’s cache of arms and how it methodically planned to bring them to D.C. ahead of Congress’ Jan. 6 session to certify the 2020 election results. Dozens of Oath Keepers came to Washington that day, and more than 20, including Rhodes, were spotted on the Capitol grounds as a pro-Donald Trump mob stormed the building. Although Rhodes didn’t enter the building himself, two groups of his allies — including Meggs, Watkins and Harrelson, surged inside with the crowd while clad in military-style garb. Back at the Comfort Inn, Oath Keeper Ed Vallejo — who is also charged with seditious conspiracy and will be tried in November — stood ready for orders to transport the weapons into Washington, either by van or by boat. Click on the link for the full article 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 1 hour ago, Dan T. said: Yes, one more crime to add to the pile. But he doesn't care because he hasn't been held accountable for any of them. He thinks he's above the law, and to this point he's right. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinss Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 So with both trump and Snyders balls in a vice, who's gonna go down first? We should start a poll. If by some miracle it happens the same day that'll quite possibly be the greatest day of my life. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 The balls you must have to make this claim... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 So we know now why MTG wanted that pardon: Atlanta Newspaper Releases Text Messages Of Marjorie Taylor Greene Plotting Jan 6 Strategy To Overturn Election The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has published text messages that show that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) was deeply involved in the plot to overturn the 2020 election results on January 6th, 2021. The texts reveal that Greene tried to recruit then-Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) in her plan to throw out certified election results on January 6th. But she failed to convince Loeffler to go along with the plot. “I need to talk with you about a plan we are developing on how to vote on the electoral college votes on Jan 6th,” Greene wrote. “I need a Senator! And I think this is a major help for you to win on the 5th!!” Click on the link for the full article and the AJC link for more of Loeffler's texts 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now