Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

ABC: Michigan man sues parents for $86,000 for tossing his porn collection

Cooked Crack

By Cooked Crack
in The Tailgate

Who do you side with?  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you side with?

    • The parents
      8
    • The son
      5
    • Both sides are terrible
      4

Recommended Posts

Cooked Crack

Cooked Crack

Posted
Posted
Quote

A Michigan man is seeking to squeeze out over $86,000 from his parents in civil court for allegedly throwing out his large pornography collection.

Quote

The rift between the family started back in October 2016 when the man moved back into his parents' Grand Haven, Michigan, home after a divorce. Among his possessions was a smut collection, he said in court documents, is worth $29,000, ABC affiliate ABC13 reported.

Less than a year later, the man moved out to Indiana. When his parents allegedly delivered his property to his new home, the son noticed that his massive collection was missing.

Quote

According to the lawsuit his father allegedly responded: "Believe it or not, one reason for why I destroyed your porn was for your own mental and emotional health...I would have done the same if I had found a kilo of crack cocaine," his father wrote. "Someday, I hope you will understand.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/michigan-man-sues-parents-86000-tossing-porn-collection/story?id=62385198

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cooked Crack

Cooked Crack

Posted
  • Author
Posted
52 minutes ago, ixcuincle said:

Doesn't say whether it was digital or physical. If it was physical videos and magazines I would have been confused. For instance, my massive collection is held on a portable USB drive 😏

Underlying news story goes into more detail. Physical with toys to boot.

 

https://abc13.com/family/man-sues-parents-for-trashing-porn-collection-worth-$29k/5247478/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malapropismic Depository

Malapropismic Depository

Posted
Posted

Speaking strictly in legal terms, it should be very clear whether or not they had a legal right to do that (unless of course, his porn was illegal in nature).

But you have to differentiate.

Because a person may or may not have 2 different answers, depending on whether you're looking at it either from an ethical or a legal perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bang

Bang

Posted
Posted

the opening statement... "Your honor, clearly i have never had a girlfriend.

And, in bringing this case to the public court, i expect to never have one."

 

This should be tossed out on the grounds of "holy ****, get the **** outta here with this ridiculousness",   which should have reams and reams of precedent.

 

~Bang

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...