twa Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 2 hours ago, Bang said: Might have something to do with investigating treason instead of committing it. ~Bang Investigations are good, and wiretaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 This is not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 So there you have it folks. Trump will flip on Iran because the Russians want him to. Trump will offer major NATO concessions to weaken the EU and then all of our allies will be sandwiched between the US, China, and Russia. A new triad of power...or should I say axis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaSkinsFan83 Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 7 hours ago, visionary said: Post West With Dumpster Fire in the WH the Russians are well on their way, thanks to the idiotic morons who voted the Tangerine Candidate into office. Make no mistake you are responsible for the reordering of Western civilization and aligning the United States with a murderous regime. You should be ashamed of yourselves, but sadly you're proud of what you've done. I think it's disgusting. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 I thought Post West was Obama's dream? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 9 hours ago, BornaSkinsFan83 said: This is from 2014 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 (edited) Edited February 19, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 2 hours ago, twa said: I thought Post West was Obama's dream? You're so full of **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 Judicial Watch once again intent on obfuscating an issue to keep the far right in power. Courts need to start shutting them down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 (edited) Edited February 20, 2017 by visionary 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Sadly, this is consistent with how Breitbart/Bannon works and sees the world. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Aiding and abetting the enemy, high crimes (felonies?) and misdemeanors (not felonies), definition of treason? I do blame the media and the Republicans for not exposing this earlier. I'm convinced that Republicans will do anything for power. Too bad they can't govern. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, visionary said: OK, so apparently, Judicial Watch is trying to file lawsuits, to push the notion that the CIA is treasonously monitoring the Trump transition team. 1) To which, as I understand it, the response is "we weren't monitoring the transition team. We were monitoring the Russian ambassador. (And Flynn called him.)" 2) I think I'm once again admiring the irony, though. Of President "I'm going to waterboard enemies" saying "well, but when you're wiretapping an enemy, and Caller ID says the caller is one of us, then you should stop recording." 3) Am I the only one who thinks that what the CIA should do, is release the records? "Here ya go. Here's a complete, itemized, list of every contact Flynn (and any other Trump officer) had with the Russian ambassador (or any other foreign officer under surveillance). And a complete transcript of every word they said. Darn. Y'all made me release it." Edited February 20, 2017 by Larry 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Actually they are supposed to not record us citizens in such cases would a warrant ECT fwih they had one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 1 hour ago, twa said: Actually they are supposed to not record us citizens in such cases would a warrant ECT fwih they had one Again, when the CIA is monitoring our enemies and a citizen calls one of those enemies you think they should stop monitoring. Got it. I wonder what other areas of law enforcement this might apply to, if the FBI is monitoring arms dealers should they stop when an American calls? What about local police staking out a crack house and a congressman walks in? Sorry, but Flynn was wrong and the CIA was absolutely right to be monitoring him as he put himself within the purvue of their investigation into the communications of our enemies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Matters not what I want, tis law Just as FOIA is law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 (edited) 22 minutes ago, twa said: Matters not what I want, tis law Just as FOIA is law Please cite the specific law that states that the CIA must stop its investigations of our foreign enemies when US citizens reach out to those enemies. I know you will NEVER admit how absurd your argument is, but it'll be fun to watch you twist in the wind. This type of investigation BTW is how traitors are caught...'magine that. Edited February 20, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Yeah, that's just silly. I have no idea what the law is but I am 100% certain that if an agency has a wiretap order, they don't have to get a separate warrant for every single person that might be surveilled. I don't recall twa making this same argument when it came to the... cough, cough [here comes the trigger word baby].... EMAILS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now