JSSkinz Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, PeterMP said: Unemployment is now as low as anytime since the 1990s in Mississippi except for the late 1990s where the whole economy was clearly over inflated due to the stock market bubble. Alabama also managed to have a lower economy during the the housing bubble, but ignoring the last 2 bubbles unemployment is now lower in Alabama since the 1990s other than when we've had a huge bubble. By what metric did things not get better in the red states over the last 8 years? https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z1ebjpgk2654c1_&met_y=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST2800000000000:ST0100000000000&fdim_y=seasonality:S&hl=en&dl=en#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=unemployment_rate&fdim_y=seasonality:S&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=state:ST2800000000000:ST0100000000000&ifdim=country&tstart=632466000000&tend=1481864400000&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false 4 Peter the people that live there and in the battleground states are the ones complaining, I can't speak for them because I live in the city and quite frankly my life is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 7 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: ^^^^^ Making false statements to law enforcement. Isn't that a crime? Truth is a funny thing at times. fwih he talked about the expelled diplomats, which he did not consider part of the sanctions. The FBI said he was truthful and cooperative....probably shoulda went with the I cannot recall bit if he is gonna be in politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 36 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said: Because nobody understands what Democrats stand for, I can tell you what I think they stand for but you won't like it so I will refrain. I'd like to hear it. I'm not sure what democrats stand for either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSSkinz Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, Jumbo said: good thing you got that dog, snowflake At 14 he only gets up to poop and eat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said: At 14 he only gets up to poop and eat. At 37 that's really all I do. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 I think looking at the Democratic platform might be a clue. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 20 minutes ago, twa said: He seems to fit in the office, though he could shed some pounds, his head even fits thru the door. I think him reasonably sane and qualified if that is what you are asking. He is the President, so yes I support him. I obviously think there were better options...of course you would hate them as well. You're certifiable then. if you can watch that and STILL support him then you're gonzo. So sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 I got home at about 3:45, and the commentary on Trump's delusional performance has been absolutely hilarious. I mean, Steve Kornacki and now Chuck Todd are probably having the time of their lives. Can't wait for the primetime lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: You're certifiable then. if you can watch that and STILL support him then you're gonzo. So sad. I try to avoid watching politicians talk, I'm more interested in what they do. Not distressed much so far.....but it's early yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, twa said: I'm more interested in what they do. Nah. Edited February 16, 2017 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, twa said: I try to avoid watching politicians talk, I'm more interested in what they do. Not distressed much so far.....but it's early yet. Place your head firmly in the sand. Digging the hole first is completely optional. Edited February 16, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Nah Leghumper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 39 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said: Peter the people that live there and in the battleground states are the ones complaining, I can't speak for them because I live in the city and quite frankly my life is good. Anecdotal evidence doesn't trump (rimshot) real evidence. Peter presented real evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) The Deep State Civil War was not how I imagined the fall of the American Republic to entail. Edited February 16, 2017 by FanboyOf91 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 1 hour ago, jschuck12001 said: The news is fake = There is not a conspiracy between Trump and his campaign where they corroborated with Russia. Point to a single reputable news source that reported the alleged conspiracy as a fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 16, 2017 Author Share Posted February 16, 2017 i know we're mixing a lot of press coverage stuff in here with the main topic, but i figure that will die off soon enough... meanwhile, cnn just ran a banner "airing of grievances" under the picture of t-bags presser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Remember when Clinton got impeached for lying about getting his **** sucked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 5 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Remember when Clinton got impeached for lying about getting his **** sucked? Yeah. I'm not sure bringing this up helps the cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Yeah. I'm not sure bringing this up helps the cause. Why not? Trump brought up Clinton. Trump lied repeatedly today. The GOP impeached Clinton for lying about infidelity. What will the GOP do about Trump's lying about his campaign contacts with Russia? I'm interested to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Remember when Clinton got impeached for lying about getting his **** sucked? Yeah but, unfortunately, actually BEING a **** isn't an impeachable offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Yeah, I'm just saying. The Lewinsky thing was pretty disgraceful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 19 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Yeah, I'm just saying. The Lewinsky thing was pretty disgraceful. And this in comparison? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: And this in comparison? Pretty comparable level. A lot more volume now. edit: just to clarify, by volume I mean the number of Trump's disgraces. Edited February 16, 2017 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 46 minutes ago, Dan T. said: Point to a single reputable news source that reported the alleged conspiracy as a fact. In fact, the NYT article repeated multiple times that it didn't have any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia in the hacks, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now