I want to sue the republican party for willful denial of scientific evidence about climate change.

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

Well I, for one, would like to thank the illuminatti overlords. This artificial construct they've trapped us all in is deliriously delightful. I've never been happier.

6 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

Neither of you are adding anything to this discussion right now, I hope you both know that.

I don't even know what thread I'm in.

Edited April 1, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff

[Springfield]

26 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

Neither of you are adding anything to this discussion right now, I hope you both know that.

 

Entertainment.

[Renegade7]

25 minutes ago, Springfield said:

 

Entertainment.

Maybe that's why the mods haven't banned him yet.  I don't want to hear it if this thread takes 3-4 pages to get back to normal.

[Springfield]

1 hour ago, Renegade7 said:

Maybe that's why the mods haven't banned him yet.  I don't want to hear it if this thread takes 3-4 pages to get back to normal.

 

Risking derailing the thread even further, it’s fun to have people like him around.  It’s easy to identify people like that and simply ignore them, mock them, whatever you want to do.  I’ve had more fun on ES when they let the loonies run wild.

[thinwhiteduke]

2 hours ago, Renegade7 said:

Neither of you are adding anything to this discussion right now, I hope you both know that.

excuse me? I have, in fact , added the the only valid point. No one here in this discussion can prove any such thing as global warming exists.

quoting sources govt/media provided for you, do not qualify as  anything other than propaganda. lol govt provided both sides for you in the first place.

ban for what? having  a third angle you cant agree with, understand or fathom? you call yourselves grown ups? critical thinkers? yet you get confused when more than two possibilities are shown to you? .  this discussion is as much fantasy as a god/heaven/hell discussion. Neither side can prove anything. All they can do is throw out numbers and claim they back up their ((belief)).. its just a fantasy/belief with no way for any one of you to prove anything.

[Renegade7]

24 minutes ago, thinwhiteduke said:

excuse me? I have, in fact , added the the only valid point.

Your opinion of the world is not a fact so it's not valid in a thread that is 79 pages long with points for both sides of the OP which is scientific evidence about climate change.

 

You can't say both sides' evidence are invalid without any evidence to support that.  And saying everyone is full of **** is not a fact either, its just a very cynical opinion of the world.  Do you even have sources you trust anymore, or are you convinced everyone is out to get you?

 

How much of the thread have you read or going to read?  Or is this another issue where you know everything you need to know which has caused you to be so ignorant on the issue that you actually don't know anything about it?

 

Edit:  You've also admitted in other threads to making posts just to get a negative reaction from people, which is absolutely a bannable offense since it's against forum rules.

Edited April 1, 2018 by Renegade7

[thinwhiteduke]

29 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

Your opinion of the world is not a fact so it's not valid in a thread that is 79 pages long with points for both sides of the OP which is scientific evidence about climate change.

 

You can't say both sides' evidence are invalid without any evidence to support that.  And saying everyone is full of **** is not a fact either, its just a very cynical opinion of the world.  Do you even have sources you trust anymore, or are you convinced everyone is out to get you?

 

How much of the thread have you read or going to read?  Or is this another issue where you know everything you need to know which has caused you to be so ignorant on the issue that you actually don't know anything about it?

 

Edit:  You've also admitted in other threads to making posts just to get a negative reaction from people, which is absolutely a bannable offense since it's against forum rules.

 

i covered what both sides are doing. I gave no opinion.

 

Quote

You can't say both sides' evidence are invalid without any evidence to support that

 

because there is none. It doesnt exist. There is no global warming. Therefore theres nothing to prove.

 

Quote

scientific evidence about climate change.

there is no scientific evidence. Only words that claim to be scientific evidence . theres a major difference between the two.

i'm not going to read any of the thread. its the same as asking me to read about a nuclear threat or what god or trump did. Its all fiction.

Are you saying you cant grasp that 100s of years of power and billions of dollars  can create its own science? all you have is faith in media. You dont actually know or understand any science. You only believe what they tell you, is science.

Quote

 Edit:  You've also admitted in other threads to making posts just to get a negative reaction from people, which is absolutely a bannable offense since it's against forum rules.

 I did no such thing, what so ever. I said I'm a good writer because I know how to get a reaction. People being negative is their inability to comprehend the different thought.

dont worry, I'll leave the thread now because I have successfully solved the problem. The truest answer has been given. If govt is funding a problem, it means the problem doesnt exist. Govt is the only thing allowing the fictional global warming argument to exist.

 

 

[Renegade7]

@Springfield  I think you and I have different ideas on the word "entertainment"

[Springfield]

15 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

@Springfield  I think you and I have different ideas on the word "entertainment"

 

Hahahaha!  Came back to the thread this morning.  My god.

[Renegade7]

Ya, I'm not wasting my Easter on this nonsense.  If ya'll do decide to play fetch with this guy, please ask him his feelings on Scientific Method for me.

[Springfield]

2 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

Ya, I'm not wasting my Easter on this nonsense.  If ya'll do decide to play fetch with this guy, please ask him his feelings on Scientific Method for me.

 

Gubment plot against bein abel to think fer youself.  Gubment bad.

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

 

 

Edited April 1, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff

[TheGreatBuzz]

I occasionally ask this and am reminded of the last time a society tried.  But based on a certain poster (whom I will not name), I think the question is worth discussion again.

 

Are we SURE forced sterilization isnt appropriate in certain cases?

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

46 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said:

I occasionally ask this and am reminded of the last time a society tried.  But based on a certain poster (whom I will not name), I think the question is worth discussion again.

 

Are we SURE forced sterilization isnt appropriate in certain cases?

I've said many times that I'm a huge advocate. Eugenics gets a bad rap.

[PeterMP]

21 hours ago, thinwhiteduke said:

There is no global warming or what ever it's called.If there is,so what? What's the point in talking about? You'll be able  to do anything about it anyway.

 It's just another thing govt. Made up,like the hollow threat of a nuclear war.

 

 

Okay, let's break this down:

 

1.  Why isn't there such a thing?

 

2.  And assuming there is, why won't there be anything we can do about it?

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

1 hour ago, PeterMP said:

 

Okay, let's break this down:

 

1.  Why isn't there such a thing?

 

2.  And assuming there is, why won't there be anything we can do about it?

Anything he doesn’t understand (which is almost everything) is a lie. There’s no such thing as climate science or weather science. When those guys tell you it’s going to snow in four days and it ends up coming true... lucky guess.

Edited April 2, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff

[PCS]

[Springfield]

1 hour ago, PeterMP said:

 

Okay, let's break this down:

 

1.  Why isn't there such a thing?

 

2.  And assuming there is, why won't there be anything we can do about it?

 

But it’s better if you just assume there isn’t.

[PeterMP]

"Global Warming Has Made Gulf Stream Slowest in 1,600 Years, and That Could Impact Our Weather"

 

https://weather.com/news/news/2018-04-12-gulf-stream-slowing-climate-change-study

 

This is where people that people that down play the effects are warming are off.  If wind patterns change, then ocean current will also change.  If ocean and wind currents both change, then precipitation patterns will also change.  If areas that we use to grow crops start getting substantial less participation (or more), then it isn't hard to imagine we could have even more trouble feeding the global population and more global unrest associated with lack food.

 

I've said here for a long time, in the end the effects of climate change are likely to be a coin flip.  For the US, where we have a pretty moderate climate and have large areas that can be used to grow food and substantial infrastructure development and population distributions based on the current sea levels and weather patterns, it is hard to see where it isn't a net negative.  And globally in the short(er) term, there is going to be a large costs associated with it. 

 

And this is another thing that those pesky models have been predicting would happen that has now been verified.

[twa]

Isn't that to be expected coming out of a ice age?

Ya warm till ya cool again(and the ice sheets cover the North)

 

 

[twa]

 

oops

 

 

Edited April 14, 2018 by twa
oops

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

Alex Jones is out of control, Jesus. Is he always like this?

 

"The left is the REAL ENEMY! They are so mad that Russia isn't their rape doll anymore. They used to go there on their honeymoons to torture people. I'm serious! It's in books. Clinton went there because that's where you could kill a Christian."

 

I'm not making that up. That's what he really said.

 

Now he just said that the left are the people who watch interracial porn. The nerd with the one inch pecker sitting next to him responds, "They're a death cult. That's what they are."

 

Ok, now they are saying Prince Phillip is Dracula. Again, I'm not making this up and he's not joking. He's saying this like you should take it VERY seriously.

Edited April 14, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff

[PeterMP]

9 hours ago, twa said:

Isn't that to be expected coming out of a ice age?

Ya warm till ya cool again(and the ice sheets cover the North)

 

 

 

1.  We aren't technically coming out of an ice ige.  We are in an interglacial period in an ice age.

 

2. There is absolutely no evidence that your 2nd statement is true.  What seems to have happened for the last several thousand years has been essentially a random walk where there have been cooler periods and warmer periods and the since leaving the last glacial period.

 

3.  In those last several thousand years, we haven't seen prolonged warming at the rate we've seen in the last 100 years or so.

[twa]

I don't do technical  

https://eos.org/research-spotlights/characterizing-interglacial-periods-over-the-past-800000-years

 

That prolonged warming has been very good to us so far.

 

100 yrs is a small sample and projected rates subject to error as you know.

 

 

[Mad Mike]

On April 1, 2018 at 3:51 AM, thinwhiteduke said:

 

 

 

 

because there is none. It doesnt exist. There is no global warming. Therefore theres nothing to prove.

 

there is no scientific evidence. Only words that claim to be scientific evidence . theres a major difference between the two.

i'm not going to read any of the thread. its the same as asking me to read about a nuclear threat or what god or trump did. Its all fiction.

Are you saying you cant grasp that 100s of years of power and billions of dollars  can create its own science? all you have is faith in media. You dont actually know or understand any science. You only believe what they tell you, is science.

 

 I did no such thing, what so ever. I said I'm a good writer because I know how to get a reaction. People being negative is their inability to comprehend the different thought.

dont worry, I'll leave the thread now because I have successfully solved the problem. The truest answer has been given. If govt is funding a problem, it means the problem doesnt exist. Govt is the only thing allowing the fictional global warming argument to exist.

 

 

I'm not sure I've met someone more disconnected from reality and actual cognitive thought than you.

Perhaps you can explain how there is no warming when we are setting new record temperatures every year?

I'll skip past the mind bending lunacy of "there is no scientific evidence. Only words that claim to be scientific evidence" You can argue with the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL scientists including the late great Stephen Hawking if you like. You are probably arrogant enough to try.

The claim of billions of dollars to "create" evidence for global warming is not only laughable, it is an assault on reality. SHOW ME THE MONEY. Who is supposed to be funding this "deception" and why. But the main thing is.. show me the cash flow. Where are all of these corrupt millionaire scientists driving Ferraris?

What I CAN show you is the flow of billions of dollars in cash from oil gas, and coal companies to republicans (GOVERNMENT) who deny climate change. 

When you can dispute the multiple arguments I've made here. When you can explain all of that traceable cash, get back to me. Otherwise you are just acting like a child with his fingers plugged in his ears repeating the classic argument... "Na Uh"

http://themadcentrist.com/2016/03/12/climate-change-and-the-fuel-of-denial/

Ironic that I ran across this meme just this morning...

Edited April 14, 2018 by Mad Mike