China Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Paging techboy, paging techboy... Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated A research group in Canada, has proven that the Old Testament has been massively mistranslated. This follows three years of research, which have uncovered the actual system for translating ancient Hebrew. The group discovered that each letter is not a letter at all, but a full word, and what was believed to be a word, is actually a sentence like description, which supplies the definition of the word. With this discovery, each word can now be properly defined and the results are astounding. This means a word can no longer be disputed and swayed by doctrinal pressures If accurate, the findings will rewrite everything we presently believe about the scriptual beginnings of the Earth. Research Head Christopher Tyreman states that what they have found, proves without a doubt, that the Bible has been grossly mistranslated and that their findings expose this fact with glaring simplicity. He further stated that he finds it interesting that a group of lay researchers were able to see and assemble what they call "Self Defining Hebrew or the SDH System" while experts seemed unaware of its existence. The team also wished people to understand that this is not a bible code, but the system the original language was built on. Its construct shows it to be a manufactured system of massive complexity, using only twenty two words, which when mixed, can supply a complete language. Mr. Tyreman also added that the form of this language shows it could not have evolved from surrounding cultures as it is incapable of importing words from outside language. Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 :munchout: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brave Little Toaster Oven Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Why is it we hear these claims every year but nothing ever changes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulane Skins Fan Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 A) This is interesting. It says its an iReport that has not been vetted. Did the research group write this itself? It does seem a little strange that they are saying they've "proved" that it was grossly mistranslated. I don't know how you "prove" it. Maybe "have evidence that suggests" would be more reasonable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Yeah, I'll believe this when they do a full translation and it's confirmed by multiple credible experts. Until then I'll assume it's a random group grasping at their 15 minutes. (If by some chance it does prove to be true, great....I'd love to see it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 If they did actually prove that, wouldnt it be reasonable to assume that they also have the correct translation and what the differences between them are? I've always assumed that translation issues, coupled with the missing gospels, may change some biblical meaning, but no idea in what way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 "Researchers Desperate For Attention" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconTheVillain Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Ummm was there anyone who believed that the bible, especially the old testament, was literally true? This really shouldn't be a shock to anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 did you see the photo of the researchers? Those people don't look like they've been deciphering ancient hebrew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 This is sure to rock the foundation of Judaism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Their super translation system makes for one difficult read: http://www.thechronicleproject.org/ (click books on the left) After reading the bios section I'm wondering if this is a joke. Go to the site and click bios and prepare to be underwhelmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimmySmith Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 It does seem a little strange that they are saying they've "proved" that it was grossly mistranslated. I don't know how you "prove" it. Maybe "have evidence that suggests" would be more reasonable?"Re: CNN" is all I needed to see. I am not dispelling the findings, just pointing the finger to another poor journalistic effort by the middle school kids who write for CNN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I knew that turn the other cheek passage was mistranslated. So backhanding deviants and heathens is the Christian thing to do. So when is the land of eh or the Peoples Republic of Calif going to come out and say the Quoran is grossly Mistranslated and announce that being stoned to death means using a bong more often than in a Cheech and Chong movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconTheVillain Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 "Re: CNN" is all I needed to see. I am not dispelling the findings, just pointing the finger to another poor journalistic effort by the middle school kids who write for CNN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Summon: Techboy Also, mistranslating words as letters? I don't think a mistranslation like that could possibly have any meaning... Read the link, seems like horse crap. Why would CNN even give these bozos any bandwidth? Must be over this social media fad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 "Re: CNN" is all I needed to see. I am not dispelling the findings, just pointing the finger to another poor journalistic effort by the middle school kids who write for CNN. Try reading: iReport is a user-generated section of CNN.com. The stories in this section are not edited, fact-checked or screened before they are posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grhqofb5 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 So what is this group's actual translation? Are they just going to leave it at "it's wrong, sorry." BTW: Did anyone else notice that the picture with the link, the four women in the front row all have tig 'ole biddies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 This is sure to rock the foundation of Judaism. I'm sure They find a new way to translate the Greek too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconTheVillain Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 BTW: Did anyone else notice that the picture with the link, the four women in the front row all have tig 'ole biddies? Yes. 3,2,4,1 IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grhqofb5 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Yes. 3,2,4,1 IMO Go to the website listed in the link. It has closeup pics. not too bad at all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins24 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Gen 1 (I think) 1. To chronicle to begin to produce, the supreme ones, with the celestials and with planet Earth. 2. And the Planet Earth had existed for a long time, without attention and amid being to note. And darkness upon, to face the salt water ocean. And to draw in (from an outside source), the supreme ones, air upon (the) face the that water. 3. And so to declare the supreme ones, "So to exist to illuminate" And so to exist to illuminate. 4. And so to perceive the supreme ones, with the to illuminate as so, to satisfy. And so to seperate, the supreme ones, between the to illuminate, and bewtween the darkness. Yep...this is sure to change everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Yes. 3,2,4,1 IMO I could go 3,1,4,2 They should'a put Jennifer in the video Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 meet the research team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulane Skins Fan Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Ummm was there anyone who believed that the bible, especially the old testament, was literally true? This really shouldn't be a shock to anyone I'm gonna guess about 100 million people in this country believe that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRNY4ZRNY Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I'm gonna guess about 100 million people in this country believe that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.