Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 In another thread, I posted my scenario for trading up to get Mark Sanchez. This requires an assumption that the Lions will take JSmith over Stafford, that Seattle will take Monroe to pair with Albert, and that the Jags will take Crabtree ... all reasonable assumptions. The Skins then will trade with Buffalo to jump ahead of Denver and select Mark at 11. That's my brain speaking. My gut is that Danny will not risk losing Sanchez after losing Cutler. He therefore will pull off a trade with the Lions for the No. 1 spot to guarantee getting his man. The trade will involve shipping Campbell to the Lions with this year's No. 13 and next year's No. 3. The Lions will be happy because they really are not sold on Stafford or JSmith given the big money it will take to sign these guys at No. 1. Danny will not have that problem with Mark Sanchez at No. 1. And it will solve Snider's challenge of finding a graceful will to depart with Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjrugger Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Jesus, I cant wait for the draft to get here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Janky Spanky Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 i don't know the point value chart but that doesn't seem like enough ammunition for us to trade up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 lol :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pocampo Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 In another thread, I posted my scenario for trading up to get Mark Sanchez. This requires an assumption that the Lions will take JSmith over Stafford, that Seattle will take Monroe to pair with Albert, and that the Jags will take Crabtree ... all reasonable assumptions. The Skins then will trade with Buffalo to jump ahead of Denver and select Mark at 11. That's my brain speaking. My gut is that Danny will not risk losing Sanchez after losing Cutler. He therefore will pull off a trade with the Lions for the No. 1 spot to guarantee getting his man. The trade will involve shipping Campbell to the Lions with this year's No. 13 and next year's No. 3. The Lions will be happy because they really are not sold on Stafford or JSmith given the big money it will take to sign these guys at No. 1. Danny will not have that problem with Mark Sanchez at No. 1. And it will solve Snider's challenge of finding a graceful will to depart with Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If this is the case which I dont see anyway in the world this happens why would we take Sanchez over Stafford who is suppose to be more NFL ready and the top rated Qb in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 lord.... id say that is a ridiculous scenario.... but i put nothing past this FO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paredskinsfan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Is it Aug 13th yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 In another thread, I posted my scenario for trading up to get Mark Sanchez. This requires an assumption that the Lions will take JSmith over Stafford, that Seattle will take Monroe to pair with Albert, and that the Jags will take Crabtree ... all reasonable assumptions. The Skins then will trade with Buffalo to jump ahead of Denver and select Mark at 11. That's my brain speaking. My gut is that Danny will not risk losing Sanchez after losing Cutler. He therefore will pull off a trade with the Lions for the No. 1 spot to guarantee getting his man. The trade will involve shipping Campbell to the Lions with this year's No. 13 and next year's No. 3. The Lions will be happy because they really are not sold on Stafford or JSmith given the big money it will take to sign these guys at No. 1. Danny will not have that problem with Mark Sanchez at No. 1. And it will solve Snider's challenge of finding a graceful will to depart with Campbell. 1) Brandon Albert went to Kansas City not Seattle 2) Danny's last name is "Snyder" not "Snider." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buenosdiaz Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 dan snyder stop making user names and trying to convince us that you are in fact being logical! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PROSCOUT Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Skins don't have firepower to trade up to #10 much less to #1. The lack of a #2 pick really hurts in so many ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Probos Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 In another thread, I posted my scenario for trading up to get Mark Sanchez. This requires an assumption that the Lions will take JSmith over Stafford, that Seattle will take Monroe to pair with Albert, and that the Jags will take Crabtree ... all reasonable assumptions. The Skins then will trade with Buffalo to jump ahead of Denver and select Mark at 11. That's my brain speaking. My gut is that Danny will not risk losing Sanchez after losing Cutler. He therefore will pull off a trade with the Lions for the No. 1 spot to guarantee getting his man. The trade will involve shipping Campbell to the Lions with this year's No. 13 and next year's No. 3. The Lions will be happy because they really are not sold on Stafford or JSmith given the big money it will take to sign these guys at No. 1. Danny will not have that problem with Mark Sanchez at No. 1. And it will solve Snider's challenge of finding a graceful will to depart with Campbell. Sounds reasonable to me,........... :doh: HAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbleedBnG83 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This is ridiculous. We don't even have the money to spend on a number one overall QB. Let me ask you something...are you basing this assumption on the stupid JLC article!?!?!?!!?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 dan snyder stop making user names and trying to convince us that you are in fact being logical! lmao oh god that is great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 the sanchez bro mance on this site ..sheesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 the OP also said we would trade Portis to move up and draft Calvin Johnson I think he just needs attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjrugger Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Here's the math 13 (1150) + 2010 4 (72)=1222 + Campbell #1 this year = 3000 LOGIC: FAIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This is ridiculous. We don't even have the money to spend on a number one overall QB.Let me ask you something...are you basing this assumption on the stupid JLC article!?!?!?!!?? If your sig comes true I might just drive to Dan Snyder's house and shake his hand myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Gregpeck, I've got a high opinion of you, so I'm not gonna finish reading this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stophovr6 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Do they give internet access at funny farms these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumplestilskin Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This is ridiculous. We don't even have the money to spend on a number one overall QB.Let me ask you something...are you basing this assumption on the stupid JLC article!?!?!?!!?? True and True Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbleedBnG83 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If your sig comes true I might just drive to Dan Snyder's house and shake his hand myself. After seeing your sig, no one would want to shake my hand:silly: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Typical Peck thread. Guess you're still off the meds, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 After seeing your sig, no one would want to shake my hand:silly: :rotflmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scskin Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Cocaine is one helluva drug!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.