Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Dick Edds and Dictator ... you must be joshing ... you mean Zorn has not agreed to work with Cutler ... er ... I mean Sanchez? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetSkins Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 no one trades into the #1 overall pick unless it's some can't miss guy sitting there, and there isn't this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DButz65 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 no one trades into the #1 overall pick unless it's some can't miss guy sitting there, and there isn't this year Like with the Heisman Trophy winner Desmond Howard? :doh: :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez is can't miss, definitely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dictator Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Dick Edds and Dictator ... you must be joshing ... you mean Zorn has not agreed to work with Cutler ... er ... I mean Sanchez? I don't know what Zorn has agreed to. What history has taught me is that Snyder is impulsive. Zorn cannot afford to have a 7-9 campaign again. IF we drafted Sanchez, then this year is essentially a throw away year. I'm not sure i want to suffer through another one. If we draft sanchez, Campbell is a lame duck QB. If the skins show poorly, I'm not sure Snyder would want to continue with Zorn. Which means another new coach. which means another new coach who is going to want to pick his QB. FWIW, I'm not the same person as Dick Edds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dictator Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 no to taco thrower=racist Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvtbred Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 No trading to #1 but we will go up to #4 if needed to get Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downbeat87 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 no to taco thrower=racist yea thats a lil too ****ed up. im glad hes not another wasp! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downbeat87 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 +1 ... not to mention what happens if JC fails and Zorn fails and we bring in a new coach after next year? You mean to tell me that whoever that coach is, is going to have to be stuck with a guy (Sanchez) that he might not want? It makes no sense regardless. Unless Snyder already has plans about a possible new coach, and maintaining a similar offensive system ... it makes NO sense at all. I cannot see Cowher or Shanahan being told "you are tied to this guy, he is the future you have to develop him".Makes no sense to me with the rest of the roster and coaching staff seemingly on a tight rope ... unless Zorn is going to be given even longer to teach a rookie QB his "new system". good logic... i think snyder and vinny use the media to their advantage. SMOKE SCREEN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 wvtbred ... there does not seem to be much of a difference between No. 1 and 4 moneywise ... a few million bucks will not be a dealbreaker, IMO. As for consideration ... my gut is that on the other hand Lions are desparate to avoid spending the money and will take any face saving deal presented ... remember Detroit also has a selection at 20(Cowboys) to fund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark The Homer Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I hate to have to state the obvious - but... Please don't abuse the tag line. This, although it's not specifically mentioned in the Forum Rules, is an extension of Rule 5 - meaning don't insult fellow members within the tag line. The tags' authors are not anonymous to the mods. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dictator Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Thank you Mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This is your brain... This is your brain on Gregpeck99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Dictator ... Campbell was not extended ... this tells me Skins have decided he is out ... Zorn certainly is aware of this. Sure, the year with Sanchez may be developmental ... but what is the alternative ... let Campbell flap aropund as a Lame Duck and then walk? Mr. Snyder will not settle for this agony, nor would I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Oldschool ... HaHaHaaaaH ... now I know why I have a headache. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schoolmaster Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Dictator ... Campbell was not extended ... this tells me Skins have decided he is out ... Zorn certainly is aware of this. Sure, the year with Sanchez may be developmental ... but what is the alternative ... let Campbell flap aropund as a Lame Duck and then walk? Mr. Snyder will not settle for this agony, nor would I. Campbell wasn't extended because his numbers were mediocre last year. I agree with others on this post that drafting a 1-year college wonderguy by mortgaging your 2009 draft and possibly a piece of 2010 is way too high. Campbell has shown glimpses of what he can do. With one, or both of his 2nd-year WRs stepping up... and staying healthy - with the Oline getting better with some new horses.... lets see what Campbell can do. Even if Campbell does well in his contract year, most teams will not likely look at him as having significant value in their system. Because his value would be due to his play in Zorn's system. That being said, Snyder would be able to sign him to a very modest 3-4 year deal and put his money in other glaring on-going needs like the Oline, Dline, LB, CB and RB. Yes RB..... Portis is not yet 30 - but hes is not a big guy.... he has taken a lot of punishment. The FO doesn't look at Ledell as a franchise RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief skin Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I hope to hell not but, danny vinny our incompetent duo is capable of anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleskins Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If the skins trade up they would probably go with Orakpo. Thats the only guy in the draft I think they really want that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 The "let's see what Campbell can do" is not an option the Skins are willing to abide by at this point ... because there is considerable evidence in the film room how that is going to turn ... more of the same. Gambling on Campbell doing well in his contract year to me presents greater odds than letting Sanchez have a shot ... I believe Mark would do better in the WCO, brevity of experience notwitstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 No trading to #1 but we will go up to #4 if needed to get Sanchez uh we have no second rounder?? where are going to get a secound rounder from capmbell insert colorful language to move up to four will take a one and 2 this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Gregpeck, props to you for defending this post I think it's a horrible scenario and unrealistic but you never know with this front office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Thanks Thirtyfive ... I want only a winner in B&G ... weary from all the same ole, same ole .... besides Sanchez will put the Skins on top of the media heap ... he's got glamour, swagger AND talent = "it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 It makes sense that we would be linked to Detroit in some way, considering that neither the Skins nor Lions have won 11+ games in a season since 1991. The only team worse than that is the Cardinals, who at least went to the SB last year. Heck, the Browns even won 11 games in 1994...and then went without a team at all for three years. Thanks, Snyder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecardiacrll Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Please dont let us trade away more picks this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 You THINK this will happen, or you HOPE? There is a humongous difference. I don't think this will happen at all, but its your prerogative if you want this to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.