Larry Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 No. If there no term limits in 2000; Bill Clinton would still be president and maybe running for a 5th term. The Dow would have passed 24,000. And the Republicans would still be claiming it was all because of Reagan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcnativenerd Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I'm going to say this once and only once. Are you ready? HELL NAW!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Obama would crush him. He beat Gore and Kerry... those two don't come close to Obama. Watch how badly McCain loses, those expecting a close race are going to be surprised. I wouldn't be surprised Bush winning the nomination, Bush was a known quantity and he still had very good GOP turnout. Do republicans want to pretend he's some rarity in their party? He's a symbol of what republicans stand for these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I 'd vote for him over the other two. Have you been paying attention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I would vote for him if for no other reason than to send all of the whiney democrats running for Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooper Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I would vote for him if for no other reason than to send all of the whiney democrats running for Canada. Good reasoning. Re-elect one of the worst presidents in history out of spite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Clicked the wrong one :doh: I honestly think he would be chased into exile. And then every GOP politician would be beaten in the streets for allowing it to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Sitting President easily wins the primary.... as he run un-opposed. (See why Hillary does not want Obama to win for 2012). Current President with experience with 8 years and Pink/Peach skin wins in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief skin Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 if mccaiin wins, the answer to the question is yes, if mccain loses the answer is no. Obviously I think most of the nation views mccain as mcbush more of the mcsame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 He's win the party nomination simply based on organization. I can't believe he'd win the general election. I'd be giving money to the other guy to help ensure that he'd lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winslowalrob Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 And it should.You guys were right. You win. You should be proud of the fact that you saw this coming. Unfortunately, even though you were right, you still lose, right along with the rest of us. I would rather watch the US go out in a blaze of retardedness knowing that I was right all along . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scuppajones Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Worst President Ever!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I would rather watch the US go out in a blaze of retardedness knowing that I was right all along . Congratulations! You just summed up all Democrats in one sentence!] :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted June 27, 2008 Author Share Posted June 27, 2008 Congratulations! You just summed up all Democrats in one sentence!]:applause: witty, humorous, sarcastic, clever who even when speaking simply operate at a level that's beyond the intellectual capacity of 90% of the people who vote Republican? Man, DoGood. That's not a nice thing to say about your party. I'm not even sure I would go that far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 witty, humorous, sarcastic, clever who even when speaking simply operate at a level that's beyond the intellectual capacity of 90% of the people who vote Republican?Man, DoGood. That's not a nice thing to say about your party. I'm not even sure I would go that far. He said it, not me. He was just brave enough to say out loud what the D's are thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannonshogs44 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I voted for him twice.....no way in hell that im even that dumb to vote for him again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artmonkforHOF Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 you forgot the "lose election, then have Daddy, Jeb & the GOP fix that problem" option in your poll. I would have voted for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyConway Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 For you folks claiming he wouldn't stand a chance: What do the people know about W, right now, that they didn't know 4 years ago? It's true. Sadly he would probably win a third term because his politcal advisers are amazing at what they do. Rove would scare the country into thinking that voting any other way would cause among others: the terrorists to win, the death of innocent unborn babies, and homosexuals to marry all across the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagleskins Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Tyrone Bigums would beat Chimpy in an election, and I would have no problem with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 No way. He has blown this thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 He'd easily win the republican nomination. He'd lose the general election by a landslide. I didn't see that option up there, so I just voted tarred and feathered by an angry mob. I don't see how republicans could vote against a current president in a nomination bid. He would get pummled by whoever ran against him even Hillary. It pains me to say that, but Hillary would defeat Bush in a presidential election right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 Yeah, I realized that about ten posts in, but you can't edit polls. I think that may be one of the reasons the exile option is so popular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 ONLY IF He bypassed the governor, Senator of La before Hurricane Katrina forced the residents to leave on all of the school buses that sat instead of being used to evacuate. Ran more like a conservative instead of trying to reach out to the other side like he did in Texas, corrected misinformation by the media and liberals immediately instead of trying to remain presidential and above the fray to the dismay of conservatives. Had a better post Iraq War victory plan that let the men on the ground fight instead of worrying about the media and liberals sniveling about numbers of troops deployed. Fought to have more refineries, domestic drilling without punitive taxes and more conservative judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.