spjunkies Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Give them Betts and a 6th rounder. That might actually work :applause: And to the people that want R. Moss, no chance in hell we can ever afford him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_cavalierman Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 For the Patriots. I think he [Randy Moss] would play hard and behave for Joe gibbs.. The Redskins locker room would not allow him to go nuts. Especially after Lloyd gets dumped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jahbird Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Rule number one of this off season The skins shall in no way, shape, or form attempt to trade away draft picks. Manlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyansRangers Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I would trade springs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 why can;t we trade for a #1 WR for a 4th rounder like the Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan3880 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 personally i prefer boldin if we go that route or chad johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dachozenone Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I might be into that, even though I love Washington, if we didn't already have McIntosh out for the majority of next season. I'm not down with having to find two new starting LBs for next year.Plus, I'm not sure the Lions really need Washington. They have a stud in Ernie Sims and a solid player in Boss Bailey. Boss Bailey is a FA I think they may let him walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchdown Redskins Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Rule number one of this off seasonThe skins shall in no way, shape, or form attempt to trade away draft picks. Manlaw We can't be extreme in our behavior and totally shun FA/trades simply because we haven't had success in the past. We are most likely going to spend a draft pick on a WR anyway, so we might as well trade that pick for a sure thing. No one in the draft this year is going to have the talent of Roy Williams. There may be a Colston in there somewhere, but for every Colston there are several more busts. We need a big receiver, so I think it's a good deal. We're not going to get him for Betts and a 6th rounder, so I would say we need to think more along the lines of a 3rd rounder and either Betts or Washington. That seems fair to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kovachs Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Please, no trades. What this team needs is depth and you get that by drafting, not by trading for a player and then giving them a huge contract. We need to draft O-lineman desperately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 at first I thought this was about the safety for the Cowboys. I would have laughed my ass off. No one wants him. Period. Roy Williams the WR, hell yah I'd take him in a heartbeat. Randel El was the best WR on the field but he really would excel at the #3 spot. Roy #1 Moss #2? El #3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_cavalierman Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 personally i prefer boldin if we go that route or chad johnson. Boldin is locked up on a big deal but Fitzgerald who is better is a free agent. I would definitely go after fitzgerald. He is the best of the available WRs next to Randy Moss. I would rather have Fitzgerald over Randy Moss though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Boldin is locked up on a big deal but Fitzgerald who is better is a free agent.I would definitely go after fitzgerald. He is the best of the available WRs next to Randy Moss. I would rather have Fitzgerald over Randy Moss though. Unrestricted FA? if so, please fire up Redskin 1 Mr. Snyder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchdown Redskins Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Unrestricted FA? if so, please fire up Redskin 1 Mr. Snyder. Fitz isn't a free agent, he just asked to be traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vacanechaser Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 why does everyone keep saying trade washington??? i dont get that move at all... maybe i am missing something here.. seems to have been a great lb for us and played banged up most of the year... i dont know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W1N_SKINS Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 chad johnson, roy williams, javon walker, and larry fitz are who i would consider same here fitzgerald is at the top of my list because he is considerably younger than the rest of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
337 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I think he [Randy Moss] would play hard and behave for Joe gibbs..The Redskins locker room would not allow him to go nuts. Especially after Lloyd gets dumped. Wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanTaylorINOURHearts Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I completely agree, Springs needs to go...Jansen will seriuosly have to compete for his starting job next year with Heyer getting better in the off season. Also, think there's a serious future with Anthony Mix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 A trade where we don't have to give up a draft pick and meet a major need works for me. For all those talking up fixing the O line and adding a DE -- I am with you but wouldn't it be easier to do that in the draft if we deal with our other needs this way? the more picks we can free up for that the better. I recall the Lions liked Shawn Springs maybe that's who we deal, we seem poised to release him for cap reasons anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dachozenone Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Larry Fitz is not a free agent. http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_contract.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1661 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I came into this thread ready to say things that would get me banned, and then I realized you weren't talking about "that" Roy Williams. :doh: :laugh:I don't know enough about the other one to give an informed opinion, honestly. But I do know we need a big, fast, sure-handed WR, and he seems like that type. So long as we don't "overpay," I guess I'd be OK with it. I had already started writing a "Thanks for letting me in ES until I made that comment in the Roy Willimas thread" letter to Om and company before I saw which RW we were talking about. Might want to change the thread title to WIDE RECEIVER Roy Williams on the trading block Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan3880 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 sorry i meant fitzgerald (brain fart) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUSkinsFan Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 When I first saw the title I thought it was for Roy "Horse Collar" Williams... But even though its for the OTHER Roy Williams I would have to say no. We need to draft a WR, not trade for one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SellersHappens Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I thinks Betts and Springs for Roy Williams would be a fair deal to both sides and would help both teams. Detriot needs a RB and someone to shore up thier horrible secondary with veteren experiance. We not only get Roy Williams, but since Betts is gone, Rock is more likely to resign with us, keeping up our special teams' quality. Macrus Mason would make a good #3 for this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chick_in_B&G Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I would love a guy like Fitzgerald, but if we traded away Shawn Springs, then wouldn't we need to acquire another corner somehow? I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel with Rogers, Smoot, and Torrence, especially if one got injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchdown Redskins Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I thinks Betts and Springs for Roy Williams would be a fair deal to both sides and would help both teams.Detriot needs a RB and someone to shore up thier horrible secondary with veteren experiance. We not only get Roy Williams, but since Betts is gone, Rock is more likely to resign with us, keeping up our special teams' quality. Macrus Mason would make a good #3 for this year. If they accepted a trade like this, I would do it in a heartbeat, especially since we don't give up any draft picks. I would love a guy like Fitzgerald, but if we traded away Shawn Springs, then wouldn't we need to acquire another corner somehow? I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel with Rogers, Smoot, and Torrence, especially if one got injured. In order to shore up our secondary after this, I would look to free agency then the draft. Both pools are amazingly deep this year, and not everyone is going to be franchised. For instance, the CBs in the free agent pool this year (in order of decreasing quality) are Nnamdi Asomugha, Asante Samuel, and Marcus Trufant. The draft is even deeper with Malcolm Jenkins, Mike Jenkins, Aqib Talib, Antoine Cason, and Reggie Smith all having first-round potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.