Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

2017-2018 NCAA Men's Basketball


PleaseBlitz

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said:

 

Yes, yes. 

 

Good.

I enjoy it.  The offense, this year especially, isn't what slows the game down but it's the other team not being able to get a clean look and having to force **** 25 seconds into the clock.  Uvas offense will shoot if they have a shot regardless of time on shot clock and so many people think they wear it down to the last 5 seconds but I guess whatever the media feeds you wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

who would you have given that two seed too?

 

Not a team with 10 losses that finished 11-7 in the ACC along with 4 other ACC teams and did not win the ACC tournament. Pretty much any of the 3 seeds or 4 seeds. UNC didn't just get a 2 seed, they were the 5 overall seed in the tournament. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hersh said:

 

Not a team with 10 losses that finished 11-7 in the ACC along with 4 other ACC teams and did not win the ACC tournament. Pretty much any of the 3 seeds or 4 seeds. UNC didn't just get a 2 seed, they were the 5 overall seed in the tournament. 

They played one of the hardest schedules in the country in arguably the hardest conference and beat top teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BenningRoadSkin said:

They played one of the hardest schedules in the country in arguably the hardest conference and beat top teams.

 

and had 10 losses and didn't win the regular season nor the tournament. 

2 minutes ago, Dont Taze Me Bro said:

 

They were 1st in SOS, 5th in RPI and SOR and 7th in BPI.   Definitely a #2 seed.

 

see above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d love to complain about our 5 seed, but we were projected as a 6, and we ALL know that the selection committee doesn’t factor tourney championships very heavily...if at all.

I said a month and a half ago that I’d be happy to avoid the NIT.

4 minutes ago, Hersh said:

 

The ever changing NCAA criteria. Cool. 

 

 

Written in pencil...if at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

who would you have given that two seed too?

 

Michigan State.  They only had 4 losses on the year and beat both North Carolina and Purdue which both got #2 seeds.  They were also ranked in the polls at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, China said:

 

Michigan State.  They only had 4 losses on the year and DESTROYED North Carolina and beat Purdue which both got #2 seeds.  They were also ranked in the polls at #4.

 

Fixed that for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ixcuincle said:

No real complaints about the field. Who made it in deserved to be in. 

 

 

Sorry, got to disagree here. Oklahoma in over Oklahoma St. Is tv media love for Trae Young. Same record, actually 1/2 game better for OSU, due to the fact they beat the Sooners 2 out of three. OSU also swept season series from Kansas and beat WVA in their house. Oklahoma was 2-8 over their last ten. Trae been figured out. OSU the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, China said:

 

Michigan State.  They only had 4 losses on the year and beat both North Carolina and Purdue which both got #2 seeds.  They were also ranked in the polls at #4.

thats fair

 

The problem is their strength of schedule is 112 and they played in the weakest of the Big 5 conferences.

3 minutes ago, Long n Left said:

Sorry, got to disagree here. Oklahoma in over Oklahoma St. Is tv media love for Trae Young. Same record, actually 1/2 game better for OSU, due to the fact they beat the Sooners 2 out of three. OSU also swept season series from Kansas and beat WVA in their house. Oklahoma was 2-8 over their last ten. Trae been figured out. OSU the better team.

this is the one I think people should be upset over.

 

OSU had a better record and was a better team than Oklahoma yet got snubbed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

 

this is the one I think people should be upset over.

 

OSU had a better record and was a better team than Oklahoma yet got snubbed.

Texas, with the exact same conference and overall record as OSU, got in from the Big XII also. I believe OSU is better than both Texas and Oklahoma.

 

OSU added a big piece in second semester with Sema, the 6'11' Rutgers transfer. Made that team far deeper and more formidable...and a better team than the other two, right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...