Jermizzle Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Josh Gordon - WR - Browns ESPN's Adam Schefter reported on SportsCenter Monday the Browns are listening to and receiving trade offers for Josh Gordon. This is very interesting for the Redskins. This a guy that RG3 wanted last year in the supplemental draft. Gordon is a legit deep threat, which we are lacking. What do ya'll think about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Can he play DB? But seriously...he's flat out dynamic. I'd love to bring him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Fred Davis straight up! (Love Madden) Our WRs are pretty decent actually. Morgan gets paid more than he's worth so probably won't be back next year. We can upgrade during the offseason without investing draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickyJ Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Trade RG3, Kirk Cousins, and Rex Grossman for him. Start Pat White, and play Swiss Army Niles opposite him. Seriously, though, I would be very interested if we could send Davis for him. Otherwise, I'd pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jermizzle Posted September 23, 2013 Author Share Posted September 23, 2013 seems like the browns are definitely rebuilding. They prolly want draft picks in return I assume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Actually wonder what kind of compensation they're after... He's a drug test away from being suspended a year. Would fit right in. But you'd think that would reduce the asking price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 He would be very good here and we need play-makers. We could see how many Division Champs gear we have left and trade that for him. I wouldn't give up significant picks, but if there was a player they wanted who doesn't fit into our plans that would be ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Adding another bufoon to a team full of them? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 No. We need to hold onto all our picks next year to continue building the young core and depth on this team. WR will be a need - Garcon is a stud but we then have Hankerson who is a good number 3, Moss who is great in the slot but is close to the end of his career, Morgan who is one of the best blockers at receiver I have seen but is no more than a number 4 guy in terms of catching the ball. I had hopes that Robinson would step up but he has not started the year well. We need a number 2 guy. However we need help all over the secondary more, a replacement for London Fletcher and a DE who can get some inside push. We also need a RT. we need all these things much much more than a deep threat WR who runs questionable routes and has some red flags in terms of the substance abuse policy. Ask yourself why the Browns are shopping him .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Can we offer them someone for Haden instead?? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Fred Davis one for one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Adding another bufoon to a team full of them? No Strength in numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 IF we're 100% certain that the drug issue was an anomaly and not a trend, then I'd have him in a heartbeat. I'd even be willing to give them back the second rounder they gave up for him. 22 years old. Highly talented playmaker. Team him back up with 10. and thats a steal of a deal in ANYONES book. Hell, dude had a great rookie season with Brandon freaking Weeden throwing him the rock last year. I normally hate these threads, but I'd be all in on Josh. But we'd have to be 100% CERTAIN the drug thing isn't an on going issue. This isn't his first time. And we have enough problems here of that ilk to start with. Hail. *Edit* As a side note, loving the fact I was savvy enough to draft him in both my fantasy leagues. I feel a fantasy trade in the wind ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Fred Davis straight up! (Love Madden) Our WRs are pretty decent actually. Morgan gets paid more than he's worth so probably won't be back next year. We can upgrade during the offseason without investing draft picks. We could upgrade the WR position with a proven player for a pretty good pick I bet and then use the cap space to try to upgrade defensively. Not saying I want to trade for him, mind you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Strength in numbers? touche sir. Trade for him, Jamarcus Russell, Mo Clarrett, and Lamar Odom for good measure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyHolt Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 For Josh Morgan. I bet many don't even notice. Well, not until Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Fred Davis straight up! (Love Madden) Our WRs are pretty decent actually. Morgan gets paid more than he's worth so probably won't be back next year. We can upgrade during the offseason without investing draft picks. This makes sense for more than one reason: 1) Gordon was Robert's teammate at Baylor 2) Freddy is from Cleveland 3) He'll open up the passing game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Do they need an all-world "elite" pass rusher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botched Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Fred Davis one for one. I would do this in a hot second. I doubt Cleveland would though, especially since their current TE is coming off a 3 TD game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 I would do this in a hot second. I doubt Cleveland would though, especially since their current TE is coming off a 3 TD game. Yeah, Cameron is a boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jermizzle Posted September 23, 2013 Author Share Posted September 23, 2013 IF we're 100% certain that the drug issue was an anomaly and not a trend, then I'd have him in a heartbeat. I'd even be willing to give them back the second rounder they gave up for him. 22 years old. Highly talented playmaker. Team him back up with 10. and thats a steal of a deal in ANYONES book. Hell, dude had a great rookie season with Brandon freaking Weeden throwing him the rock last year. I normally hate these threads, but I'd be all in on Josh. But we'd have to be 100% CERTAIN the drug thing isn't an on going issue. This isn't his first time. And we have enough problems here of that ilk to start with. Hail. *Edit* As a side note, loving the fact I was savvy enough to draft him in both my fantasy leagues. I feel a fantasy trade in the wind ..... totally agree. Rg3 and Gordon will be hell of a combo. If we know his drug issue is over with then i'll be all over this! Yes, for all the fantasy football people....snag Gordon on waivers if he's still available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve09ru Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 No. We need to hold onto all our picks next year to continue building the young core and depth on this team. WR will be a need - Garcon is a stud but we then have Hankerson who is a good number 3, Moss who is great in the slot but is close to the end of his career, Morgan who is one of the best blockers at receiver I have seen but is no more than a number 4 guy in terms of catching the ball. I had hopes that Robinson would step up but he has not started the year well. We need a number 2 guy. However we need help all over the secondary more, a replacement for London Fletcher and a DE who can get some inside push. We also need a RT. we need all these things much much more than a deep threat WR who runs questionable routes and has some red flags in terms of the substance abuse policy. Ask yourself why the Browns are shopping him .... you answered your own argument. We need a #2 so send a 3rd over for him. He's young, proven and you don't have to spend a draft pick on a 'hopeful' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Why would Cleveland want Davis when they have Jordan Cameron who is younger and better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Do they need an all-world "elite" pass rusher? KG, Please, in future, check in with me first before you post such hilarity and have me spit soda over the desk in out right laughter. The clean up is never as funny. Appreciated. Your (now coke stained) friend GHH. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Sorry GHH but I just want to continue the "hilarity" of that to be un-named all-world "elite" pass rusher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.