MattFancy Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 If anything it seems the Browns want draft picks or young players. I don't see how we could do this giving up Morgan, Davis, Cousins, etc. No chance we trade Cousins for Gordon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 ..... No chance we trade Cousins for Gordon. Probably not for some bizarre reason. But I'd make that trade in a heartbeat if the drug issues were put to bed. Serious position of need fixed with top quality young receiver coming off great rookie year verses backup QB with one and two bit games pro experience. No brainer. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 He's a little better than Hankerson. No thanks. Andre Johnson is also a little better than Hankerson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Andre Johnson is also a little better than Hankerson. If by "a little" you mean "a whole hell of a lot" then yes, he is. Probably not for some bizarre reason. But I'd make that trade in a heartbeat if the drug issues were put to bed. Serious position of need fixed with top quality young receiver coming off great rookie year verses backup QB with one and two bit games pro experience. No brainer. Hail. True, but Cousins is our greatest bargaining chip. Not sure I'd let him go straight up for a WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 If by "a little" you mean "a whole hell of a lot" then yes, he is. True, but Cousins is our greatest bargaining chip. Not sure I'd let him go straight up for a WR. I was being sarcastic, b/c Gordon is about 10x better than Hank. Saying he's a "little better" is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Andre Johnson is also a little better than Hankerson.Stats say otherwise..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 I was being sarcastic, b/c Gordon is about 10x better than Hank. Saying he's a "little better" is a joke. I knew you couldn't be serious but didn't quite pick up on where you were going with it. My mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baylor Alum Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 As a Baylor guy, I hate to say this, but I wouldn't touch him even if the Giants gave me draft picks to go get him. At Baylor, he was found with another player asleep in a car containing weed at a Taco Bell drive thru. He wasn't suspended because the other player admitted it was his weed. But he got suspended the next year for failing a drug test. His recent suspension for drugs shows that he is just plain stupid. And stupid is incurable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 I was being sarcastic, b/c Gordon is about 10x better than Hank. Saying he's a "little better" is a joke. Cool, now please explain how Gordon is '10x better' than Hankerson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 just saw this....wonder who the team is. Schefter made it clear the Browns won't trade Gordon unless a team meets their asking price, but they already have at least one offer on the table. "There already is a team that has made an active offer for Josh Gordon," said Schefter. Carolina.....maybe Pats? Cool, now please explain how Gordon is '10x better' than Hankerson. He can actually catch the ball?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 As a Baylor guy, I hate to say this, but I wouldn't touch him even if the Giants gave me draft picks to go get him. At Baylor, he was found with another player asleep in a car containing weed at a Taco Bell drive thru. He wasn't suspended because the other player admitted it was his weed. But he got suspended the next year for failing a drug test. His recent suspension for drugs shows that he is just plain stupid. And stupid is incurable. Good info. Sounds like more trouble/risk than he is worth but I don't know enough about him to say if he truly put those problems behind him or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Carolina.....maybe Pats? He can actually catch the ball?? Haha.Even with stone hands, statistically, they're not far off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper 21 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Kirk orakpo Davis 3rd / Gordon Haden / Gordon Thomas ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Haha. Even with stone hands, statistically, they're not far off. lol, i was surprised when i checked the stats that they were actually pretty close...i dont think there is anyway now do i want us to give up a pick for Gordon. However i just dont think Hank is ever going to be that guy for us. Has all the tools but struggles catching the football. Add finding a #2 WR to the list for next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Kirk orakpo Davis 3rd / Gordon Haden / Gordon Thomas ? Just wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 lol, i was surprised when i checked the stats that they were actually pretty close...i dont think there is anyway now do i want us to give up a pick for Gordon. However i just dont think Hank is ever going to be that guy for us. Has all the tools but struggles catching the football. Add finding a #2 WR to the list for next season.Agreed.I like that he's a big target. Teams don't get rid of guys they believe in. If we were 3-0, many would feel the way I do about this guy. Kirk orakpo Davis 3rd / Gordon Haden / Gordon Thomas ?Say what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper 21 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Haha rak and Davis are both FA got to remember that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Haha rak and Davis are both FA got to remember that Well that means the Browns wouldn't pull the trigger on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper 21 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Well puma they got cap that we don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Well puma they got cap that we don't What does their numbers look like and are they willing to use money on Vets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Kirk orakpo Davis 3rd / Gordon Haden / Gordon Thomas ? Did it work in Madden? I just tried it in my fantasy league and it was vetoed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gymratfwp Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Interesting possibility...However, I don't think that we are going to be the ones to land him though...it seems that teams like the Pats, Ravens, Niners would be a little bit more desparate at the moment given the situation of their respective receiving corps. It would be nice to have another target for RG over the long term. Instant upgrade at the #2 WR spot assuming he could stay away from drugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Well puma they got cap that we don't Which means they could sign them after the season. There is no reason to trade for them now. All that would do is get them a chance at a worst draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Kane Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 Which means they could sign them after the season. There is no reason to trade for them now. All that would do is get them a chance at a worst draft pick. This. One thing for sure, the Browns have some sort of vision; as crazy as it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper 21 Posted September 23, 2013 Share Posted September 23, 2013 That's fair thought you guys were thinking we were giving to much! I would do that though for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.