skinsfanindallas88 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I never trust anything RW puts out...especially something pre World War I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 First he's not coming, then he is. First the FO hates Flynn, now they like him. Seriously, can we just lock all the pundits in a room and tell them to not come out until they get their story straight? That being said, I'll take Kiper over over Roto based on history, but then again who knows what happens. Hopefully Flynn doesn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Kiper's "grapevine" in Adam Schefter. I'm going with Kiper on this one.---------- Post added January-19th-2012 at 06:21 PM ---------- Hey Authentic - your Inbox is full! Hey Higgy, i'm good now , hit me up!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 We aren't getting a QB this year, that's what my crystal ball says. Another year of Rex Grossman (re-singed) then sell the farm for Matt Barkley next year. Use all our picks this year to bolster the offensive line, secondary, WR core, and linebackers. I am not opposed to Matt Flynn though. this board would commit mass suicide if this happened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Logic dictates that Skins would be slobbering over Flynn. Nonetheless ... Skins should Draft Brock Oswieler just in case! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abdcskins Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Probably lol. The talk since October has been that we need a QB. I just don't see us trading up to get RG3 nor are we going to make a run at Flynn. We are gonna wait another year to get our guy. I don't think the FO cares about Tannehil, Osweiler, or Foles. I sort of like Case Keenum but no one seems to be with me on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Ruckus Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 This community can't handle another year of Sexy Rexxy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJValleySkinz Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 LL, you're barely ever wrong and when you make a call on something I stop taking any other reports seriously, but you seem to be more emotionally invested in Griffin becoming the Skins QB then simply predicting it (I mean no offense, just being honest) Flynn has a limited body of work but some of the throws he made against the Lions were some big league throws and he does have qualities that would make him a good fit for this offense. I don't think this is BS at all. I see Griffin being plan A, but I don't think anyone of the decision makers is adopting a Griffin or bust policy and it's very plausible that Flynn is plan B. ---------- Post added January-19th-2012 at 03:41 PM ---------- We aren't getting a QB this year, that's what my crystal ball says. Another year of Rex Grossman (re-singed) then sell the farm for Matt Barkley next year. Use all our picks this year to bolster the offensive line, secondary, WR core, and linebackers. I am not opposed to Matt Flynn though. With another year of Rex Grossman all we'll have to sell to get Matt Barkley is a contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I see Griffin being plan A, but I don't think anyone of the decision makers is adopting a Griffin or bust policy and it's very plausible that Flynn is plan B. Impossible. Flynn can only be the skins plan A, because he is a FA. That comes March 13th. Draft comes April 26th. Our plan A is coming from the draft, plain and simple. The true plan B is if come summer and Peyton Manning is 100% healthy, he will be plan B. But, regardless we are drafting someone this year. Just a matter of who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveakl Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 We aren't getting a QB this year, that's what my crystal ball says. Another year of Rex Grossman (re-singed) then sell the farm for Matt Barkley next year. Use all our picks this year to bolster the offensive line, secondary, WR core, and linebackers. I am not opposed to Matt Flynn though. The draft day is going to be a blast. Stay away from here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wysknz1 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Probably lol. .. I sort of like Case Keenum but no one seems to be with me on that one. I like Case, but cocensess is he's too short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I like Case, but cocensess is he's too short. Consensus lol ...and how tall/short is he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slackermike Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Am I in the ****ing twilight zone? This made me laugh. Anyway, I really hope we get RGIII Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpskins10 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I like Case, but cocensess is he's too short. No the consensus is that he's not that talented and is more of a product of the offense he plays in. Lacks arm strength to be more than a backup in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newera Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 When does weasel Mike ever tip his hand. He always plays it close to the vest. Geez, they didn't even attend last seasons Senior Bowl, yet drafted about five guys from the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Or we could, you know, just wait until April 26 and find out. This whole thing is a conspiracy by Pfizer and your doctor to get you a Xanax prescription. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pick6 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Flynn = Grossman 2.0 Dude has only played 2 games in the NFL. I would much rather just get a 2 round QB if we can't Luck/RG3. I don't understand why some people are inflating Flynn value's after one game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSUSkins24 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Am I in the ****ing twilight zone? :hysterical: :hysterical: That comment sent me into fits of laughter. What a beautiful smoke screen. Nobody knows what the **** is going on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
je21 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 According to RotwitPN, we're considering signing Jason Campbell and Donovan McNabb to 100 mil contracts to tutor our rookie QB, who we'll acquire in the draft by trading up, then down, then up again, then passing on the pick 8 times before surprising everybody by selecting a 12 year old who isn't eligible yet. Lmao! I agree. We go through this every year. Wait I just read an article saying we traded our first three picks for Peyton Manning and brought back Grossman to tutor Manning in our system. Come on people, wait till March then start talking about this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Is this a serious post?Do you think he would sign with no signing bonus? Do you know the cap implications of doing such a move? Signing bonus and cap implications wouldn't be the issue here. It would absolutely destroy the credibility of the FO here. Why would any free agent ever sign with us after seeing the way we treat our players? If we did that to our "franchise quarterback of the future" why wouldn't we do it to anyone else? Bad business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poman Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I am of the opinion that I would like to draft our own guy. And these conflicting reports are hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskindan07 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I am sure that we will be interested in someone else tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRedfishCo Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 No the consensus is that he's not that talented and is more of a product of the offense he plays in. Lacks arm strength to be more than a backup in the NFL. FYI in 2004 Art Briles then coach of University of Houston recruited a QB named Kevin Kolb. In 2007 Briles then recruited Case Keenum to run the same offense (later was coach under dana hogerson and then kliff kingsbury). Robert Griffin III also committed to Houston but transfered to Baylor when Briles left for Balyor before the bowl game in 2007. Point is, Briles' offense is a deviation of the Texas Tech offense in which Kolb, Keenum, and Griffin III all played in. If you say Case' offensive stats are a product of the system them so is RGIII. Prior to 2011 RGIII was boarderline a disappointment, while Case had multiple 5,000 yard 40+ TD seasons. Is Case a better NFL prospect then RGIII? No, base on raw ability and arm strength, but Case is extremely smart, mobile, accurate, and has the best pocket presence I have seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Flynn = Grossman 2.0 Dude has only played 2 games in the NFL. I would much rather just get a 2 round QB if we can't Luck/RG3. I don't understand why some people are inflating Flynn value's after one game. any questions? ---------- Post added January-20th-2012 at 02:26 AM ---------- i dont know about a qb who snokes cigs lol Shanny might have a issue with his cardiovascular endurance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Never4Get21 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I have read most of the threads regarding Matt Flynn and one thing I have noticed that people fail to mention is that it could end up costing us just as much if not more to sign Flynn rather than trading up to get Luck or RG3. Green Bay is not stupid and they are not just going to let him go. They will probably use a franchise tag on him and then if we negotiated a contract with him and Green Bay doesn't end up matching it and we get him then they would receive compensation. I am not exactly sure what it would cost but it could end up costing something like 2 first round picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.