Cooleyfan1993 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, KDawg said: Yes, it does. Watson, so we can cheer for heinicke watson, because we can cheer for heinicke both mean the same thing 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 minute ago, Cooleyfan1993 said: Watson, so we can cheer for heinicke watson, because we can cheer for heinicke both mean the same thing 😂 I’m not sure where you went to school but if in America this is frightening. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooleyfan1993 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 4 minutes ago, KDawg said: I’m not sure where you went to school but if in America this is frightening. Explain to me then, how both those sentences aren’t saying the exact same thing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfan1311 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 15 hours ago, Conn said: So....on that play where Gibson gave himself up and the announcers were saying how smart he was for staying in bounds. After watching this, the credit goes to Turner. Interesting stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 minute ago, Cooleyfan1993 said: Explain to me then, how both those sentences aren’t saying the exact same thing 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfan1311 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 minute ago, KDawg said: So...........................................................................................................................................................................................................what? 😉😂 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinss Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 Aaaaannnnnddd we're off the rails again! 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacchist Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 4 minutes ago, redskinss said: Aaaaannnnnddd we're off the rails again! We're off the rails, so we're arguing about grammar. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmandoug1 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 minute ago, bacchist said: We're off the rails, so we're arguing about grammar. Because we're arguing about grammar.....sheesh. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zim489 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 9 hours ago, FootballZombie said: Mariota in this run heavy O would slap. Add in the read option and a QB who is a legit running threat and this O takes a step. It would be most helpful in the RZ where the misdirection could lead to some walk in scores. I'm not sure the pass game would improve very much but the run game would be even more efficient an nigh-unstoppable. I personally thought MM was the best option for this year. Didnt think he was a long term option. Still isnt. Hes a smart guy too that would have learned the system with relative ease IMO. I still want a rookie to build around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 If I thought we'd have last year's pass protection I was fine with Wentz. Knowing we had to resort to this heavy run based offense Mariotta would have been better but I don't think that's the preferred style of play for Rivera or Turner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraCommander Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 12 minutes ago, redskinss said: Aaaaannnnnddd we're off the rails again! When it comes to QB's we've been on the Crazy Train for a long time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinss Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 hour ago, zCommander said: Taylor. More moxie 😁 Plus taylor is 7 feet tall. He kills db's by the hundreds. on Sunday he's gonna consume the falcons with fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightning from his arse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Stupid Loser Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 41 minutes ago, KDawg said: This is why I still come in here. All the fancy book lernin. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 10 minutes ago, redskinss said: Plus taylor is 7 feet tall. He kills db's by the hundreds. on Sunday he's gonna consume the falcons with fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightning from his arse. Want to talk about off the rails. Yeesh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HigSkin Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 10 hours ago, TK said: 😂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJL Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 52 minutes ago, Cooleyfan1993 said: Explain to me then, how both those sentences aren’t saying the exact same thing Okay, you're assuming these guys are saying that if Watson was here we coulde cheer for Heinicke to replace him. While that is true, that's not the sentiment most would take from it. What that sentence is meant to say and most are taking it as is "If Watson were here we wouldn't feel like we could cheer the Commanders starting QB, which we can do with Heinicke as starter" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zim489 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 hours ago, FLSkinz83 said: 12 out of 20 starts for TH have ended in one score games....our record is 9-3. 1 score games end up at 50% on an over time average. Most teams don't go above 55%. Taylors time will come crashing down sometime. Hey maybe we'll get that luck next year when we have an openly tanking QB room of TH and Howell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooleyfan1993 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 23 minutes ago, MrJL said: Okay, you're assuming these guys are saying that if Watson was here we coulde cheer for Heinicke to replace him. While that is true, that's not the sentiment most would take from it. What that sentence is meant to say and most are taking it as is "If Watson were here we wouldn't feel like we could cheer the Commanders starting QB, which we can do with Heinicke as starter" No I understand the meaning. I was just saying that the placement of “so” and “because” doesn’t change the meaning at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ball Security Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 hours ago, FLSkinz83 said: 12 out of 20 starts for TH have ended in one score games....our record is 9-3. Is that true? 2021: Giants, Falcons, Panthers, Seahawks, Raiders Ws. Broncos, Cowboys, Eagles Ls. 2022: Packers, Colts Ws. Vikings L. 7-4. I could see making a case for counting this years Eagles game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 hours ago, Cooleyfan1993 said: Oh, ok. Agreed also, “so” or “because” doesn’t change the sentence at all so I feel like correcting me on that was kinda not necessary "So" means the former causes the latter. "Because" means the latter causes the former. Ice is solid, so it is frozen. The water is frozen, because it is cold. They're literally opposites. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooleyfan1993 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 5 minutes ago, NewCliche21 said: "So" means the former causes the latter. "Because" means the latter causes the former. Ice is solid, so it is frozen. The water is frozen, because it is cold. They're literally opposites. “We’d want Watson as our QB, because we can cheer for heinicke (due to Watson being an awful person)” “we’d want Watson so that we can cheer for heinicke (due to Watson being an awful person)” both have the same intended point, either word in that sentence doesn’t change the meaning at all, as shown in my examples Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 Good lord stop with the grammar discussion please 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLSkinz83 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Ball Security said: Is that true? 2021: Giants, Falcons, Panthers, Seahawks, Raiders Ws. Broncos, Cowboys, Eagles Ls. 2022: Packers, Colts Ws. Vikings L. 7-4. I could see making a case for counting this years Eagles game. I counted the Eagles win, even though it was technically an 11 point win I also counted the Bucs win; but just realized they won by 10, but that was really a one score game. The Cowboys losses were blowouts. Edited November 23, 2022 by FLSkinz83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, Cooleyfan1993 said: “We’d want Watson as our QB, because we can cheer for heinicke (due to Watson being an awful person)” “we’d want Watson so that we can cheer for heinicke (due to Watson being an awful person)” both have the same intended point, either word in that sentence doesn’t change the meaning at all, as shown in my examples why in the blue **** would we WANT Watson so we can cheer for Heinicke? And how does that relate to my posted conversation about guys we’d take Heinicke over? You’re wrong. You correct everyone’s grammar and messages on this forum, you typed my words incorrectly, you were proven wrong. Take the L and move on. Holy ****. 1 minute ago, Warhead36 said: Good lord stop with the grammar discussion please Agree. Who knew correcting him with his “quote” that he typed incorrectly from my post would turn into remedial English class? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.3d05d94a5044fa9ada2aa8cc7156fc2a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now