AsburySkinsFan Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, twa said: Lotta things change with circumstance padre.. Just not your oh so predictable attack on someone claiming to be sexually assaulted by a young Republican. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) The lists are kind of pointless, though I would put some weight to believable and detailed individual testimonials about a person's character and truthfulness. But of course they can only tell you so much and it's hard to know what people are thinking or what they're doing when you aren't around. And there are always other factors to take into account like bias and having a blindspot to certain people and behavior. Edited September 18, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Just not your oh so predictable attack on someone claiming to be sexually assaulted by a young Republican. care to quote any attack on her by me ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 There's a lot of people who say nice things about Kavanaugh. Of course, a lot of people said nice things about Ted Bundy, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 6 minutes ago, AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy said: There's a lot of people who say nice things about Kavanaugh. Of course, a lot of people said nice things about Ted Bundy, too. Bill still gets good reviews....no accounting for tastes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) Maybe the typically ****ty WSJ editorial board should have checked in with Trump and the senate first..... Edited September 18, 2018 by visionary 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 If that editorial has facts right, it’s going to be a serious problem for Ford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 27 minutes ago, twa said: care to quote any attack on her by me ? Oh just your dismissal of her statement because her story wasn’t released as soon as you wanted. THAT is seriously offensive, that somehow the accusations are to be ignored or that you care less about them, or that it should be ignored because of timing. 13 minutes ago, visionary said: Maybe the typically ****ty WSJ editorial board should have checked in with Trump and the senate first..... Exactly, might as well come from Faux News. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Yeah. I’m... I’m just gonna sit this one out guys. Let me know when we hit rock bottom. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Yeah. I’m... I’m just gonna sit this one out guys. Let me know when we hit rock bottom. Trump is still the current occupant of the White House so....it’ll be awhile yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbit Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) just polygraph both of em. should take all of an hour or two Edited September 18, 2018 by Gibbit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 11 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Oh just your dismissal of her statement because her story wasn’t released as soon as you wanted. THAT is seriously offensive, that somehow the accusations are to be ignored or that you care less about them, or that it should be ignored because of timing. So you got nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Gibbit said: just polygraph both of em. should take all of an hour or two The problem is that they could both pass because they could both believe the story they are telling. It was 30+ years ago. And if Ford is right they were drunk. It’s very plausible that neither of them are lying and still telling different stories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 has she ever defined it to a specific date and place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: It’s very plausible that neither of them are lying and still telling different stories I think that's a stretch. In the realm of possibility, sure. Very plausible? Nah. Somebody isn't telling the truth. Edited September 18, 2018 by AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbit Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: The problem is that they could both pass because they could both believe the story they are telling. It was 30+ years ago. And if Ford is right they were drunk. It’s very plausible that neither of them are lying and still telling different stories eh f it used to be easy to post photos here...wtf Anyways Castanza gives the thumbs up Edited September 18, 2018 by Gibbit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy said: I think that's a stretch. In the realm of possibility, sure. Very plausible? Nah. Somebody isn't telling the truth. Maybe one is. Maybe both are. Maybe neither are. A polygraph won’t help solve that though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbit Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: Maybe one is. Maybe both are. Maybe neither are. A polygraph won’t help solve that though its the whole point of polygraphs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Gibbit said: its the whole point of polygraphs And if both of them pass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 18 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Yeah. I’m... I’m just gonna sit this one out guys. Let me know when we hit rock bottom. I didn’t mind taking shots at releasing anonymous accusations of attempted rape right before a vote, but now.... theyre going to ruin this woman’s life whether it happened or not. And the gop can confirm him if they want, regardless. Wonder how that’s going to sit with Feinstein. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbit Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, Kilmer17 said: And if both of them pass? shotgun wedding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now