visionary Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) Some interesting insights into the process. Edited September 14, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeman38 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Persuasive speculation? Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 I’d like to know what this sexual misconduct is exactly. I got all drunk, called up a girl, and told her that I wanted to **** her on a mailbox when I was 14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 It’ll all be over soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Feinstein is such a piece of ****. Whether the allegation has merit or not, she decided to politicize and weaponize it. **** her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: Feinstein is such a piece of ****. Whether the allegation has merit or not, she decided to politicize and weaponize it. **** her. Um she literally sat on this for months and only brought it to light because of media inquiries. She's a POS cause she sat on it. Edited September 14, 2018 by Cooked Crack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, Cooked Crack said: Um she literally sat on this for months and only brought it to light because of media inquiries. She's a POS cause I she sat on it. Yes. She sat on it. Either the allegation has merit, in which case she should have made it public immediately. Or it's not and she knows it and is just now using it as a political stunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo the kKklown Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: She's a POS cause I she sat on it. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: Yes. She sat on it. Either the allegation has merit, in which case she should have made it public immediately. Or it's not and she knows it and is just now using it as a political stunt. Or she's also tone deaf old lady who thought she was taking the high road. Feinstein failed this woman. If she's using it as a political stunt then she's an idiot. No one is going to think she looks good. Edited September 14, 2018 by Cooked Crack 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 It surprisingly doesn't look like this was politically hit-job timed (though Dianne could always be playing coy), but rather was out of a misguided attempt to focus on legal issues with Brett, which has naturally blown up once someone sniffed a letter. Eh, it's whatever. Core question is, did it happen? If so, Shady Brett becomes Rapey Brett and needs to quietly retire somewhere he's not allowed to coach youth soccer. If not, well then we're back to where we were (which is with his 200k debt explanation not making any sense and him probably being guilty of perjury). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 5 hours ago, Kilmer17 said: It’ll all be over soon. Oooh. That’s dark. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 The GOP has known about the allegations and did nothing either? ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 "he didn't sexually assault us" is not a good defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 (edited) Clarence Thomas would say yes but he hasn't spoken in 15 years. Edited September 14, 2018 by The Evil Genius 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 I love the smell of desperation in the morning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 41 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: "he didn't sexually assault us" is not a good defense. there is no good defense to a baseless accusation , there are of course people willing to put their name down as character witnesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Next up the Dems are going to ask him when he stopped beating his wife. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, twa said: there is no good defense to a baseless accusation , there are of course people willing to put their name down as character witnesses. Is it a baseless accusation? I haven't been following the latest developments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 1 minute ago, NoCalMike said: Is it a baseless accusation? I haven't been following the latest developments. If it's not, then Feinstein should be removed from office for sitting on it until now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 6 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: If it's not, then Feinstein should be removed from office for sitting on it until now. If so she likely wouldn't be the only one on either side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, visionary said: If so she likely wouldn't be the only one on either side. Agreed. If it's true and people knew it was true and did nothing, they should be removed from office. And if this turns out to be fake (ie UVA/Duke) then those spreading the lie should be charged with slander and also removed from office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now