Cooked Crack Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Just now, nonniey said: Irrelevant. .... can't purge rolls solely based on lack of voting/ time. Sure, dude. The notice is cover to purge based on lack of voting. They might as well switch up notice with the voter doing a little dance. If the voter doesn't do the dance then they get purged. Now it's not illegal cause it's not only based on lack of voting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Sure, dude. The notice is cover to purge based on lack of voting. They might as well switch up notice with the voter doing a little dance. If the voter doesn't do the dance then they get purged. Now it's not illegal cause it's not only based on lack of voting. The notice? You mean the multiple notifications/requests for response sent over four years asking the voter if he still lives where he is registered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 If not voting were only one of the trumped up reasons to purge voters, that's violation of the law. Tacking on a bunch of "reasons" to circumvent the issue of nonvoting is the very definition of skirting the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, nonniey said: The notice? You mean the multiple notifications/requests for response sent over four years asking the voter if he still lives where he is registered? Yeah, that notice. I'll amend my post to say dances over multiple years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: If not voting were only one of the trumped up reasons to purge voters, that's violation of the law. Tacking on a bunch of "reasons" to circumvent the issue of nonvoting is the very definition of skirting the law. Just FYI seems like those challenging the law concede that non-voting can in fact trigger the process to remove voters. I bet this will be a 7-2 or 6-3 decision in favor of Ohio. "Paul Smith, representing civil rights groups at the Supreme Court, said most people who receive notices from the state never return them. "The evidence we have in the record is that most people throw it in the wastebasket," Smith said. The state learns nothing about whether someone actually has moved if a notice is not returned, he said. He said a process that used a notice which could not be forwarded and would be returned as undeliverable if sent to a wrong address would satisfy the opponents. But Chief Justice John Roberts said he regarded Smith's comment as a concession that states could use evidence of non-voting to trigger the process. "Your argument really turns on the adequacy of the notice," Roberts said." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, nonniey said: Just FYI seems like those challenging the law concede that non-voting can in fact trigger the process to remove voters. I bet this will be a 7-2 or 6-3 decision in favor of Ohio Where are you pulling these numbers from? You are living in an alternate reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Where are you pulling these numbers from? You are living in an alternate reality. I said I'd bet that is what the result would be as in a prediction. We'll know come June. Do you have a prediction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 1 minute ago, nonniey said: I said I'd bet that is what the result would be as in a prediction. We'll know come June. Do you have a prediction? Liberals all voting against Ohio. Already know Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas already decided. Probably 5-4. Should be against Ohio but partisanship is strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 16 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Liberals all voting against Ohio. Already know Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas already decided. Probably 5-4. Should be against Ohio but partisanship is strong. I'm thinking Breyer and maybe Ginsburg will vote in Ohio's favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 You must be on something really strong if you think Ginsburg will vote positive for Ohio! You know nothing about her votes at all. After all, she is Notorious RBG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Arizona Senate candidate Arpaio still claims Obama birth certificate is fake, claims he has proof, gave it to the FBI, nothing was done because Russia. What a loon! https://thinkprogress.org/republican-senate-candidate-joe-arpaio-says-he-has-proof-that-obamas-birth-certificate-is-fake-03023299d352/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 DCCC needs to get in the phone with Generic Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 47 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: Arizona Senate candidate Arpaio still claims Obama birth certificate is fake, claims he has proof, gave it to the FBI, nothing was done because Russia. What a loon! https://thinkprogress.org/republican-senate-candidate-joe-arpaio-says-he-has-proof-that-obamas-birth-certificate-is-fake-03023299d352/ From that article: Quote In a separate interview on WABC Radio, Arpaio criticized the FBI for focusing on Russia and not his evidence on Obama’s birth certificate. “You gotta do what you feel is right, and not have these cover-ups and people not willing to look at everything we got. Why won’t they look at it? We sent it to the FBI two years ago. With a lot of other information. Where is it? They’re too busy talking about Russia,” Arpaio said. He's literally on TV. Why doesn't he just tell everyone what "it" is while he is on national television? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Because there's no "it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 21 hours ago, nonniey said: I'm thinking Breyer and maybe Ginsburg will vote in Ohio's favor. This is from PBS news hour from last night. Just one excerpt Quote : U.S. Army Sergeant Joseph Helle was in Iraq in 2006 and 2007, and in Afghanistan in 2009. But when he came home to Ohio in 2011, he found a battle he didn't expect. Helle showed up to vote that fall, and found his name had been removed from the voter rolls But hey, since your party is for it, **** that guy, right? Oh, another ****ing joke is when the Ohio Secretary of State said this law is to “It's done to try to be helpful to the voter, and helping them update their information,” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 13 minutes ago, Hersh said: This is from PBS news hour from last night. Just one excerpt But hey, since your party is for it, **** that guy, right? Oh, another ****ing joke is when the Ohio Secretary of State said this law is to “It's done to try to be helpful to the voter, and helping them update their information,” Odd he didn't get mail and they are usually afforded the opportunity to vote while deployed. I do agree a provisional ballot or such should be a option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 18 minutes ago, Hersh said: This is from PBS news hour from last night. Just one excerpt But hey, since your party is for it, **** that guy, right? Oh, another ****ing joke is when the Ohio Secretary of State said this law is to “It's done to try to be helpful to the voter, and helping them update their information,” Again Ohio executes a process lasting four years (FOUR YEARS) before a voter is removed from the rolls. They send multiple notifications requesting responses. There is no way you will be able to convince the vast majority of people that that is unreasonable. And frankly it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the Supreme Court has a 9-0 ruling in Ohio's favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Honest question..does being homeless, in your view nonniey, mean you sacrifice your right to vote? The entire argument though, in general, is silly to me. There is really no valid reason to require people to continually sign up to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 27 minutes ago, nonniey said: And frankly it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the Supreme Court has a 9-0 ruling in Ohio's favor. You're making it too obvious that you're a troll. You need more subtlety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: You're making it too obvious that you're a troll. You need more subtlety. I almost went down that road. I find any voter suppression law like this to be totally un-American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Name change, address change, party affiliation change (in some states). That should be the only requirements needed to be updated by the voter (and the SOS or whoever handles the state voting rolls could be connected to the State DMVs to ease some of the burden on the voter). Otherwise you'd stay on the voting roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 9 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said: Name change, address change, party affiliation change (in some states). That should be the only requirements needed to be updated by the voter (and the SOS or whoever handles the state voting rolls could be connected to the State DMVs to ease some of the burden on the voter). Otherwise you'd stay on the voting roll. Death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Just now, PleaseBlitz said: Death. And how does the voter make that update? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.