Fan since a Fetus Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 I think the Repubs are upset about the Biden truck issue because the world has learned that great people, tremendous people, like the Trumps never pay anybody for their services in their minds it is probably very unnatural to pay someone back that went out of their way for you. Nah, you piss them off enough that they won’t want to be around you and then you’re free of your debt. Genius really. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 "Paying for things" is socialism. "Stealing it" is capitalism. This is why we have guns. ~Bang 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 4 hours ago, Califan007 The Constipated said: Maybe he should have blurred his face when videotaping himself... I'm actually thinking of a parallel. To the Civil War. You see, this whole genre of glorifying the Confederacy, happened after they lost. When they started the war, they thought they were going to win. So they didn't need excuses. Four Confederate states, when they voted to secede, literally passed resolutions through their legislatures, saying what their reasons were. (And every one said it was about slavery, and nothing else.) (In fact, their biggest complaint was that they wanted the federal government to tell abolitionist states that, when a southerner took a slave to a state where slavery was illegal, that the abolitionist state had to treat the slave as a slave, anyway. Which kind of goes against the current myth that the Confederacy was fighting for "state's rights".) When they stormed the Capital building, the Trumpers thought they were going to win. They were proud of their actions. The coverup about what they did, started the next morning. 9 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 16 minutes ago, Larry said: I'm actually thinking of a parallel. To the Civil War. You see, this whole genre of glorifying the Confederacy, happened after they lost. When they started the war, they thought they were going to win. So they didn't need excuses. Four Confederate states, when they voted to secede, literally passed resolutions through their legislatures, saying what their reasons were. (And every one said it was about slavery, and nothing else.) (In fact, their biggest complaint was that they wanted the federal government to tell abolitionist states that, when a southerner took a slave to a state where slavery was illegal, that the abolitionist state had to treat the slave as a slave, anyway. Which kind of goes against the current myth that the Confederacy was fighting for "state's rights".) When they stormed the Capital building, the Trumpers thought they were going to win. They were proud of their actions. The coverup about what they did, started the next morning. This is probably one of the best posts you've ever made. (But I'll admit I haven't gone back and read through them all.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Quote Police investigating sexual assault allegations against Florida GOP Chair Christian Ziegler have obtained a video Ziegler took of the encounter, according to the Florida Trident. Citing two sources with direct knowledge of the police investigation, the Trident – the publishing arm of the Florida Center for Government Accountability – is reporting that Ziegler shot the video on his cell phone and the alleged victim can be heard speaking during the encounter, which Ziegler says was consensual. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Admiring the notion that the state head of the Nazi movement in my state is: 1) Took cell phone video of his sexual assault. 2) Named "Christian Zeigler" 3) And looks like that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 And now we know why 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Is it just me? Because I'm reading that as "former aides targeted my daughter, because she has an OnlyFans account."? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 1 hour ago, Larry said: Is it just me? Because I'm reading that as "former aides targeted my daughter, because she has an OnlyFans account."? Yeah the guy is mad because his aide out the door says he's going to tell people about the representatives daughter having an onlyfans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 So, Congressman. How do you feel about Republicans going after the children of politicians? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Yeah the guy is mad because his aide out the door says he's going to tell people about the representatives daughter having an onlyfans. If it's true, then I don't really blame him for being upset. But he's also a Republican, so......"if" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 I wonder if his daughter is upset at the influx of 'fans'. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 9 hours ago, Bang said: I wonder if his daughter is upset at the influx of 'fans'. ~Bang That crossed my mind, too lol...usually, anyone who starts up an OnlyFans account is--wait for it--looking for fans. It's right there in the site name. Sounds like he feels it may hurt him more than it would hurt her. Someone saying "His daughter has an OnlyFans account" is more like free advertising...not to mention, this is something that should have been discussed at length between him and his daughter before he ran (or at the time she decided to open an OF account if it happened after he decided to run). That being said, if I felt someone was gonna publicly go after my daughter's reputation and character for ANY reason, I'd turn into that person's worst nightmare and obliterate them. **** them and **** that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 The Ziegler scandal: Quote from an article - "But when the woman learned Bridget Ziegler wouldn’t join the meeting, she informed him [Cristian Ziegler] she wasn’t interested via text: “Sorry I was mostly in for her.” That text says (or alludes to) just a ****load, and could probably bury both them fools. 1) It could be used as motive--"she rejects him and he ends up raping her" is just damning. 2) "Mostly in for her" points to Bridget most likely being "in it" for the other woman as well, and not some "I only did it to please my husband" bull**** she might try and claim...which in a vacuum doesn't mean **** because there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. I mean, good for her, we're all human. Couldn't give less of a ****. But there is no vacuum...this is a woman who proudly endorsed (and maybe even helped write) the infamous "Don't Say Gay" bill in Florida and stood smiling next to DeSantis as he signed it into law. It would be like if she campaigned to make slavery legal again for black Americans, helped write the law, then beamed proudly as she stood by while the the bill was signed into law....then found out she's actually black and only looks white lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 (edited) This happens a lot in our community. Usually in a club atmosphere or online site like Plenty of Fish, a woman looking for another woman either contacts another woman or another woman approaches a woman first, then the man is introduced after a time. This sounds like to me that these three had some sort of liaison and the mister took it upon himself to contact the other woman and his wife might not have known this. The couple might have an agreement to only swing together. And if the person they picked up was more interested in the wife, then she obviously wasn't willing to be with just him. He might have said wife would enter later just to be alone with the other woman. I was pretty attractive in my younger years and this happened a lot in clubs. Woman approaches, asks for a dance, buys drink, and hubby suddenly appears. It's always a "no" from me, I had my time with men. So this sounds perfectly normal to me. And he sounds like scum. Edited December 9, 2023 by LadySkinsFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, LadySkinsFan said: This happens a lot in our community. Usually in a club atmosphere or online site like Plenty of Fish, a woman looking for another woman either contacts another woman or another woman approaches a woman first, then the man is introduced after a time. This sounds like to me that these three had some sort of liaison and the mister took it upon himself to contact the other woman and his wife might not have known this. The couple might have an agreement to only swing together. And if the person they picked up was more interested in the wife, then she obviously wasn't willing to be with just him. He might have said wife would enter later just to be alone with the other woman. I was pretty attractive in my younger years and this happened a lot in clubs. Woman approaches, asks for a dance, buys drink, and hubby suddenly appears. It's always a "no" from me, I had my time with men. So this sounds perfectly normal to me. And he sounds like scum. The woman making the accusation was a long-time friend of the husband, something like 20 year friendship. I think I read that he and Bridget approached the hubby's friend and initiated everything, and my guess is that the friend only agreed because of Bridget and not because of him...if they have been friends that long without anything happening between them, she had NO interest in him at all lol...so completely agreeing with your "she obviously wasn't willing to be with just him" comment, not to mention she told him "no" in her text but he went over anyway. But I don't know if anything ever happened between Christian Ziegler and this woman during their friendship or not. At any rate, doesn't sound like it was a meeting through a site or at a club (not that you were saying it was). I was "fine back in the day" as well lol...and got approached a few times by women for threesomes (no men involved) but not at clubs, it was always women I knew before. Never took part even though I liked the idea of it...but I'm not cut out for that, I don't think. But I never judge those who do as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult. EDIT: Actually I take that back lol...there were two times where I didn't "exactly" say no and things went forward--once just for a moment and another, um, a bit longer. Oh, ****, ok make that three times lol...just remembered yet another time where things advanced forward for a brief moment with me, a woman I was involved with, and her friend. I can't believe I just brushed these experiences aside. Edited December 9, 2023 by Califan007 The Constipated 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 35 minutes ago, Califan007 The Constipated said: The woman making the accusation was a long-time friend of the husband, something like 20 year friendship. I think I read that he and Bridget approached the hubby's friend and initiated everything, and my guess is that the friend only agreed because of Bridget and not because of him...if they have been friends that long without anything happening between them, she had NO interest in him at all lol...so completely agreeing with your "she obviously wasn't willing to be with just him" comment, not to mention she told him "no" in her text but he went over anyway. But I don't know if anything ever happened between Christian Ziegler and this woman during their friendship or not. At any rate, doesn't sound like it was a meeting through a site or at a club (not that you were saying it was). I was "fine back in the day" as well lol...and got approached a few times by women for threesomes (no men involved) but not at clubs, it was always women I knew before. Never took part even though I liked the idea of it...but I'm not cut out for that, I don't think. But I never judge those who do as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult. EDIT: Actually I take that back lol...there were two times where I didn't "exactly" say no and things went forward--once just for a moment and another, um, a bit longer. Oh, ****, ok make that three times lol...just remembered yet another time where things advanced forward for a brief moment with me, a woman I was involved with, and her friend. I can't believe I just brushed these experiences aside. You forgot to include --- Dear Penthouse: 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, EmirOfShmo said: You forgot to include --- Dear Penthouse: You'd be surprised what my reality consists of lol... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 (edited) Man, seems like a lot of people are way less inhibited than I am. I just can’t see myself working up the nerve to ask one of my long time friends to tag team my wife with me. 2 hours ago, LadySkinsFan said: I was pretty attractive in my younger years Pics Edited December 9, 2023 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 From another article lol: "On Wednesday, one member of a Sarasota Reddit forum noted the irony, writing, “Because of the Zieglers and all the gossip they’ve evoked around school, my elementary-aged kids now know about swinging and threesomes.” That's what happens when an anti-LGBTQ person ends up possibly being part of the "Bs" in that group of letters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 Should somebody sue them, for violating "Don't Say Gay"? I mean, I think the law was intentionally written so that it only took one Karen offended parent to sue. And intentionally vague about what could be prosecuted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now