Jumbo Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 ah, seeing nunes on fox yesterday...the gross blatant lying and spinning with laura ingraham...what a piece of human detritus i suggest a tour of the kennels 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 By "pull us apart", Putin means "oppose my army's attempts to conquer". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 (edited) Edited February 24, 2020 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) Edited February 25, 2020 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 28, 2020 Share Posted February 28, 2020 (edited) Edited February 28, 2020 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 28, 2020 Share Posted February 28, 2020 In short, the court of appeals has ruled that any current of former executive employee may completely ignore any congressional oversight. And Congress' sole remedy is to shut down the government, or to impeach federal officers (without any evidence, since it's being denied.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Larry said: In short, the court of appeals has ruled that any current of former executive employee may completely ignore any congressional oversight. And Congress' sole remedy is to shut down the government, or to impeach federal officers (without any evidence, since it's being denied.) Don't forget, also listed, is citing them for contempt of Congress. From Wiki: Quote Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment, imprisonment for coercion, or release from the contempt citation). I suggest they start arresting people and bringing them before Congress, and if they're uncooperative, jail them. They want to play games, time to get serious. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 Yea I don’t really understand what the Legislative is doing asking the Judicial to join the fray by making a legal decision. The shame!! 1 hour ago, China said: suggest they start arresting people and bringing them before Congress, and if they're uncooperative, jail them. They want to play games, time to get serious. Democrats don’t have the testicular fortitude for that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 21 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said: Democrats don’t have the testicular fortitude for that. Yeah. It couldn't possibly derive from not having the firepower to effect such a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 6 minutes ago, Larry said: Yeah. It couldn't possibly derive from not having the firepower to effect such a thing. They do in the House. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said: They do in the House. The House has the law enforcement ability to go out in the world, grab people off the street (including current government officials), physically drag them to Capitol Hill, and detain them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Larry said: The House has the law enforcement ability to go out in the world, grab people off the street (including current government officials), physically drag them to Capitol Hill, and detain them? My understanding is exactly where they can go in carrying out their duties has never really been tested. For example, they can *paraphrasing* force a Congressperson to come to work when they refuse to. Even if you say they can’t leave the Capitol grounds to carry out their duties, I’m sure there can be some creative ways to make things happen. But again, the Dems don’t have the stones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 ^^Can we get the same judge to rule the same way for White House Occupant based on his written answers to Mueller's questions? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, EmirOfShmo said: ^^Can we get the same judge to rule the same way for White House Occupant based on his written answers to Mueller's questions? not the same judge, but if you ask enough times your likely to find someone who can be bought. Edited March 3, 2020 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Hillary testified for 11 hours, under oath, before Congress. This is taking this email crap to the extreme given that Trump's own children serving as his advisors use unsecured phones, including Trump himself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now