Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

[visionary]

 

 

 

[Llevron]

Can someone tell me why Roger Stone looks like that and blinks so much. Does he have some kind of condition? Or is it all of the nose sugar? Something about him just looks ****ed up and it bothers me that I cant figure it out. 

 

He reminds me of the "special" bird on Looney Tunes.  

 

*this guy

[Cooked Crack]

 

[visionary]

 

[Dan T.]

28 minutes ago, Llevron said:

Can someone tell me why Roger Stone looks like that and blinks so much. Does he have some kind of condition? Or is it all of the nose sugar? Something about him just looks ****ed up and it bothers me that I cant figure it out. 

 

He reminds me of the "special" bird on Looney Tunes.  

 

*this guy

 

 

 

                         

Edited April 4, 2018 by Dan T.

[Llevron]

Oh you're good. 

[Dan T.]

Stone might also be brain-addled from STDs picked up during the course of his secret life as a swinger in the DC area.

 

 

 

 

 

Not that there's anything wrong with that.  Unless you represent a family-values candidate. As Stone did. Or unless you hypocritically take down a political opponent for essentially the same thing you are doing.  As Stone did.

 

http://www.cracked.com/blog/trump-adviser-roger-stone-giant-anthropomorphic-dick/

 

 

Edited April 4, 2018 by Dan T.

[visionary]

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited April 4, 2018 by visionary

[Momma There Goes That Man]

8 hours ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

 

 

I guess if there was anything to this we would know right? Seems like a dud. Geez 

[SoulSkin]

1 hour ago, visionary said:

 

 

I imagine the answers were a little more polite than "Is fake newez. Is newez for eediots, if you don' understand. Now get lost pleeyuz. Sank you."

[DogofWar1]

Gonna guess if we're hearing about this now, that Mueller has all he needs from Russians who don't usually travel to the US.  Every oligarch who doesn't have to absolutely come to the West is gonna stay far away now.

[visionary]

 

[DogofWar1]

 

 

Story checks out

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/us/politics/donald-trump-jr-secret-service.html

[tshile]

Not implementing dmarc for domains linked to the president is unacceptable. 

 

Not doing it after directive to do so in 90 days (basically someone catching you not doing your job then giving you 3 months to do it) is even more unacceptable. 

 

Implementing dmarc is trivial. It takes less than 2 hours to research, set up, and test. 

[Bozo the kKklown]

1 hour ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

 

I guess if there was anything to this we would know right? Seems like a dud. Geez 

You don’t tell a person they being investigated for a crime.

[tshile]

9 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

You don’t tell a person they being investigated for a crime.

 

Dont the federal investigations have to list people as of interest etc?

[Bozo the kKklown]

3 minutes ago, tshile said:

 

Dont the federal investigations have to list people as of interest etc?

That’s different than what I said, albeit semantics.

 

That is ultimately my point.

 

Also Mueller wants to talk to Trump as well.

[tshile]

9 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

That’s different than what I said, albeit semantics.

 

That is ultimately my point.

 

Also Mueller wants to talk to Trump as well.

But I thought one of the categories was “you are being investigated for a crime “?

 

im honestly not trying to be difficult. I’m quite clueless on this stuff 

[LadySkinsFan]

Said he wasn't a target. Doesn't mean that they aren't looking at everything around an individual from investigating other people. 

 

Doesn't mean that someone won't be a target in the future.

[Bozo the kKklown]

49 minutes ago, tshile said:

But I thought one of the categories was “you are being investigated for a crime “?

 

im honestly not trying to be difficult. I’m quite clueless on this stuff 

I was being lazy.

 

Mueller said he is not currently the "target" of any criminal investigation. That is what I meant by Mueller not explicitly saying "Donald Trump, we are investigating your criminal acts."

 

That doesn't mean they aren't investigating him, nor should Mueller say anything along those lines considering he still wants to interview him.

[Springfield]

I gotta say, this whole thing is starting to look like a dead end to me.

[LadySkinsFan]

Just because we aren't hearing anything beyond the indictments so far, doesn't mean that nothing is going to happen. 

 

Gates flipped. I hope like hell he isn't assassinated before he can spill everything he knows and can testify. Same with Flynn and Papadopoulos, and whoever else they have on deck.

 

To think otherwise is Republican pipedream.