DogofWar1 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 9 minutes ago, twa said: The latter is only done if a problem becomes known, the FBI/DOJ affirm the rules were followed as part of the request. The IG is more likely to be one one determining if rules were followed, which is their job. So what you're saying is that you have no proof anything was done improperly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, DogofWar1 said: So what you're saying is that you have no proof anything was done improperly. Proof would require knowing exactly what was presented to the court. There are indications things were done improperly,whether by design or ignorance is TBD. Kinda like this Russian thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 18 minutes ago, twa said: Proof would require knowing exactly what was presented to the court. There are indications things were done improperly,whether by design or ignorance is TBD. Kinda like this Russian thing. There are no indications. There were the frenzied ravings of one of Nunes' staff that were not even remotely accurate and have been shown to be false and under-researched. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, DogofWar1 said: There are no indications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) twa knows the playbook. He's been doing it for years. He's just asking questions. Why are you all so afraid of questions? He still has questions about Benghazi, and Pizzagate, and Jade Helm, and Obama's planned gun grab, and Obama's birth certificate, and FEMA deathcamps, and the NAFTA superhighway. No issue is too discredited for twa to fight on to frame the narrative. He's just asking questions. twa - perhaps we should discuss this narrative of yours that mysterious, undefined (but probably rilly rilly bad) "things were done improperly" before the FISA court using a graphic aid. Edited February 7, 2018 by Predicto 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 So it is your assertion things have not been done improperly when requesting FISA warrants? Or just in the Page ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 stick and move stick and move 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 22 minutes ago, twa said: So it is your assertion things have not been done improperly when requesting FISA warrants? Or just in the Page ones What would you allege was done improperly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 9 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said: What would you allege was done improperly? How can he know? How can anyone know? It's all so mysterious (and probably nefarious and certainly cause for worry). He's just asking questions. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, RedskinsFan44 said: What would you allege was done improperly? Citing a yahoo news article to support the steele memo seems off when the source for the article was Steele. Using a source that violated protocol is another of course they could have been ignorant of the facts....but pleading ignorance is not a good look either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Predicto said: How can he know? How can anyone know? It's all so mysterious (and probably nefarious and certainly cause for worry). He's just asking questions. It's hard for me to ever put anyone past the Undertaker, but twa is up there, man. The way he gets his hooks in people..... sight to behold. He needs a raise. Edited February 7, 2018 by Mr. Sinister 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, Mr. Sinister said: He needs a raise. I accept paypal. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 15 minutes ago, twa said: I accept paypal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 58 minutes ago, Mr. Sinister said: The way he gets his hooks in people..... sight to behold. It's masterful. He gives you just enough to know he's smart enough to understand, and then just refuses 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06 CEG LG to DOJ FBI (Unclassified Steele Referral).pdf just asking questions bro. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) Edited February 7, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Geez, the amount of lying by this whole bunch is unprecedented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) When Trump says he wants a "killer", he means that he is looking for someone who is totally loyal, completely unprincipled, unfeeling, remorseless... A few have tried to portray themselves as such but most have come off as unconvincing. There's only one "killer" on Trump's team. edit: Anybody remember the time that **** broke James Caan's legs with a sledgehammer? Why aren't we talking about that? Edited February 7, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 They last a week until they quit because they won't suborn perjury. Besides, he doesn't listen and he doesn't pay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 2 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: When Trump says he wants a "killer", he means that he is looking for someone who is totally loyal, completely unprincipled, unfeeling, remorseless... A few have tried to portray themselves as such but most have come off as unconvincing. There's only one "killer" on Trump's team. edit: Anybody remember the time that **** broke James Caan's legs with a sledgehammer? Why aren't we talking about that? He wants DARPA to reanimate Roy Cohn. Cohn is the man he is 2nd most infatuated with, ahead of Jared and behind himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) Then why did it get unanimous support.... Edited February 7, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now