Oldskool Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 The Washington Redskins are making plans to add a high-profile wide receiver in an NFL free agent market that has them in abundance, according to several people familiar with the team’s deliberations. Most of the speculation about the Redskins’ planned offseason retooling has focused on their strategy to upgrade at quarterback. But offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan has publicly acknowledged the team’s need for a big-play wide receiver, and people with knowledge of the team’s plans say they appear to be focusing on the free agent market, which opens March 13, rather than the draft, for that player. Such a move could aid the development of a young quarterback if the Redskins add one, perhaps by trading up in the NFL draft to select Baylor’s Heisman Trophy winner, Robert Griffin III, in April. Or it could make for a more potent offense built around a veteran quarterback if the Redskins are able to sign Peyton Manning, who soon may be released by the Indianapolis Colts, or Kyle Orton in free agency. For the rest of the article, see http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/post/redskins-may-pursue-free-agents-vincent-jackson-pierre-garcon-and-marques-colston-in-the-hunt-for-an-impact-wr/2012/02/29/gIQAxegTiR_blog.html Vincent Jackson - WR - Chargers The Washington Post reports the Redskins are "making plans" to sign a "high-profile" free agent wide receiver in March. The Redskins no longer have a single proven receiver who can separate from top corners and make plays after the catch. The team plans to address the position via free agency as opposed to the draft. Vincent Jackson and Pierre Garcon are considered the top targets, though Marques Colston is another option if he escapes New Orleans. Reggie Wayne would only be courted as part of a package deal with Peyton Manning. Related: Redskins, Reggie Wayne, Marques Colston, Pierre Garcon Source: Washington Post Feb 29 - 1:24 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiingspadee Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Shouldn't it say OR instead of and.....by saying and it sounds like we are going after all three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HA1LV1CT0RY Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Shouldn't it say OR instead of and.....by saying and it sounds like we are going after all three **** it, lets get all three! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 bulletin....bulletin.... bulletin...airship tragedy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backpack3r Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 We need to stop at nothing to get RG3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Would prefer 2 tier 2 options (Garcon/Royal) as opposed to 1 A level option (VJax/Bowe) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiingspadee Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Would prefer 2 tier 2 options (Garcon/Royal) as opposed to 1 A level option (VJax/Bowe) With 93 million (I think someone said) in cap space.....get Garcon/Royal and Jax/Bowe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 We need to stop at nothing to get RG3 Holy crap can we have one thread where there inst a non sequitur RG3 mention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 If we're going after a WR, I want it to be Colston. 1000+ yards in 5 of 6 seasons (and that odd season out was cut short due to injury. He was averaging more ypc than any other year) and at least 5 TDs every year. He's young (29 when the season starts). Go for it. ---------- Post added February-29th-2012 at 01:43 PM ---------- With 93 million (I think someone said) in cap space.....get Garcon/Royal and Jax/Bowe Bowe's not an option. He's getting franchised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 With 93 million (I think someone said) in cap space.....get Garcon/Royal and Jax/Bowe 93 million? That would mean the team only has ~$30m tied up in cap space and I don’t see that being correct. Last I heard before the teams last 2 signings they had about $53m in space. I could be wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukes and Skins Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 93 million? That would mean the team only has ~$30m tied up in cap space and I don’t see that being correct. Last I heard before the teams last 2 signings they had about $53m in space. I could be wrong though. Looking to be about 49 million in cap right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 If we're going after a WR, I want it to be Colston. 1000+ yards in 5 of 6 seasons (and that odd season out was cut short due to injury. He was averaging more ypc than any other year) and at least 5 TDs every year. He's young (29 when the season starts). Go for it. I worry that Colston is more a product of having Brees at QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor703 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I would take Colston/Royal. Royal affords us the ability to cut ties with Brandon Banks and would also give us the ability to move Santana Moss for a late round pick if any team were interested. ---------- Post added February-29th-2012 at 01:49 PM ---------- I worry that Colston is more a product of having Brees at QB. I disagree. Colston is as advertised. He catches everything, runs great routes and has the ability to go up in the end zone and come down with the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 We need to stop at nothing to get RG3 Random RG3 posts like this, that are unimaginably repetitive and add nothing even to an RG3 topic and appear even in non RG3 threads, have become an unacceptably stupid problem and are essentially "spam" by rule and, as the case here, can result in a one week ban under the aforementioned rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidGQ Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Would prefer 2 tier 2 options (Garcon/Royal) as opposed to 1 A level option (VJax/Bowe) We already have Tier 2 - Moss/Hankerson/Gafney We need a Top Tier WR With 93 million (I think someone said) in cap space.....get Garcon/Royal and Jax/Bowe We had about 40 mil in cap space. But we signed Montgomery and Scott so that should be less. Then we also need to resign Fletcher and Davis(Tag). So we won't go out and sign everyone. I think we will sign similar to last year. 2 -3 players at most. I think we will sign HT also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Would prefer 2 tier 2 options (Garcon/Royal) as opposed to 1 A level option (VJax/Bowe) Not me... i think we need 1 2nd teir WR (Royal) AND a 1st teir WR (VJax)... at that point we would actually have depth at the position. Plus we don't how Hanks hip will hold up by the start of the season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiingspadee Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Yeah I thought 93 was a little bit out there....read it in some thread....I knew that could not have been right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 With 93 million (I think someone said) in cap space.....get Garcon/Royal and Jax/Bowe We have 93 million commited to the cap currently, which gives us roughly 49 million in cap space with which to work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Champskins Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 NEWSFLASH: Redskins will be tied to every big name FA, every single year.... why stop now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 We already have Tier 2 - Moss/Hankerson/GafneyWe need a Top Tier WR Exactly. Preferably we get either Jackson or Colston. Both of them have been consistently productive. Colston is a little younger, yet more injury prone. Both good prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Paint Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Shouldn't it say OR instead of and.....by saying and it sounds like we are going after all three We have plenty of cap room. Get them all lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I worry that Colston is more a product of having Brees at QB. I'd be more concerned if it were Henderson or Meachem. Colston has stickum hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tris Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Would prefer 2 tier 2 options (Garcon/Royal) as opposed to 1 A level option (VJax/Bowe) Based on Garcon rejecting a 5 year offer from the Colts, and reportedly setting his base annual salary at $8 MM, Garcon is a tier 2 WR looking to get p-a-i-d like a tier 1 WR. Personallly, I think he's a tier 3 WR, but that's neither here nor there. And based on the lastest tweet, considering Colston is looking for $7 MM per, Garcon is setting himself up as the more expensive option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horton_Predator48 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 The article talks about how this is such a deep market for WRs but in truth it seems like most of them could be tagged. I like Colston for his size, although he may be a product of Brees, he is still an upgrade over any WR on our team. If not him, I like Royal for his age and speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I'd be more concerned if it were Henderson or Meachem. Colston has stickum hands. yeah, but Malcolm Kelly knees... ---------- Post added February-29th-2012 at 02:00 PM ---------- The article talks about how this is such a deep market for WRs but in truth it seems like most of them could be tagged. I like Colston for his size, although he may be a product of Brees, he is still an upgrade over any WR on our team. If not him, I like Royal for his age and speed. I don't think we can only target Royal.. I see him more as a utility guy. We need him and another stud... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.