Slateman Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So he's going to he good because he blocks well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackToGlory Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Well it seems to me with the fumbles and drops Gafney has been having and Santana's injury I think Paul needs a shot. I mean whoelse really deserves to be out there? We don't know what happens in practice, we surely don't know the Shanahan's intentions but heck with the line being injured, having a mobile QB, it seems to me that keeping what was it, 7 recievers on the roster it's time to basically open up the offense. It appears this line isn't a mash'em grinder line, so Torrain won't be effective, I say give Helu the start, spread the offense out and get the ball to the recievers and see who steps up. We know defenses will be covering Davis but there is no tape really on Paul or Hankerson and they are big. Hell at this point any playtime they get now will only help next year when we will have a better line and hopefully know for sure who our franchise QB will be. Time will only tell but we can't continue to do the same thing and expect different results. We can't run so open up the damn offense and let these rookies go and make plays..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I was listening to the beat reporter on 106.7 this AM...and he was saying how both Armstrong and Paul have a GREAT opportunity right in front of them. It's sad (and understandable) how Hankerson isn't even mentioned....4 year senior at Miami and is having an AWFUL transition to the pros. I expected more. I hope Paul takes the bull by the horns here and REALLY produces. His skillset as a WR kinda reminds me of Miles Austin. Hope he can be just as good or BETTER (with less drops LOL). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Niles Paul has been getting game time for skills other than catching the ball. Hankerson not being pro bowl day 1 is the expected not the norm and specifically WRs shouldn't be expected to come in and produce on a team with as poor QB play as we've had. Any time you look around the league at WRs producing straight away there's usually a really good QB throwing the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I was listening to the beat reporter on 106.7 this AM...and he was saying how both Armstrong and Paul have a GREAT opportunity right in front of them. It's sad (and understandable) how Hankerson isn't even mentioned....4 year senior at Miami and is having an AWFUL transition to the pros. I expected more. I hope Paul takes the bull by the horns here and REALLY produces. His skillset as a WR kinda reminds me of Miles Austin. Hope he can be just as good or BETTER (with less drops LOL). Sure there are those that quickly transition to the pros but WR can be a tricky position. On top of that a shortened offseason. Give him a little time before judgement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Sure there are those that quickly transition to the pros but WR can be a tricky position. On top of that a shortened offseason. Give him a little time before judgement. Oh, I'm not writing him off....just never expected Niles Paul to be THIS far ahead of Hankerson as far as development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HogNose Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So is it safe to say Niles Paul= James Thrash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedup2 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Niles is good on special teams which gets him on the field and familar with the speed of the game which helps him at WR and he is physical and can block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So is it safe to say Niles Paul= James Thrash? Why not go all in and say Hines Ward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I loved him in Fawlty Towers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtpop Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I think Paul could contribute and certainly should get a chance with Moss on the shelf for 4-6 weeks. We shall see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 My first name is Paul. It would be cool to have and 84 with Paul on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I am a Nebraska homer but I always felt he would be the Redskins steal of the draft. If he would have played in an offense that passes more he probably would have gone in the second or third round. Big, physical, good blocking, speed, and hard working. That is a killer combo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 that's an awesome post - great information. I enjoyed reading that. I think he will see action anyways since Hankerson ran the wrong route and Moss is injured. Can't wait! Although against buffalo.... sigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryko Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I really think Niles Paul is going to be a factor in the future. I dream of a time when he and Hank will be our 1-2 punch, with austin (or armstrong/aging moss) in the slot. If anyone has contact with Niles, show im this video please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 So he's going to he good because he blocks well? Yes, in that being a good blocker means you are going to get game reps which means the QB will eventually throw your way and tends to force defenses to play straight even when you've got though you got a 3 or 4 wide package in meaning you may get some mismatches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbyst21 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Hate that Moss went down, but man am i amped to see him on the field more. Especially after that quote from Keenan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm late getting to this thread, but I just want to thank SkinsTillIDie for showing how to make a truly superior OP and set up a topic. I also hope it's time for Paul to see more action. That both he and AA will develop to be what we need at WR (deep threats) would be fantastic good fortune for us. I believe it is a fair possibility, but it's too early yet to tell a lot about our passing game for all the obvious reasons (not just the QB situation, but line and TE and even the balance needed from a solid run game). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Always A Commander Never A Captain Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I really think Niles Paul is going to be a factor in the future. I dream of a time when he and Hank will be our 1-2 punch, with austin (or armstrong/aging moss) in the slot. If anyone has contact with Niles, show im this video please! ...what the hell did I just watch? ---------- Post added October-27th-2011 at 09:35 PM ---------- Yes, in that being a good blocker means you are going to get game reps which means the QB will eventually throw your way and tends to force defenses to play straight even when you've got though you got a 3 or 4 wide package in meaning you may get some mismatches. Agreed. Being such a good blocker means he'll get on the field a lot. Now he just needs to get on the field more in passing situations. He had 2 catches last game? Sign of things to come. We actually NEED him to get more involved in the passing attack since teams will look at him being on the field, and assume it's a run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarantula Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I remember hearing a Paul/Hines comparison, in terms of blocking and overall toughness. Let's hope this becomes reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 That sideline catch he made last week was NICE. I hope he continues to get some looks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfan4life83 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm hopeful all this year's wide out rooks will be eventually, the speedster Robinson included.Great to read Shanahan's comments on the progress of Paul. I'd read the HC saying either him or Armstrong will get the start Sunday, which is great to know. Here's to the start of a long, rich career in DC Niles. Now if only Beck can get you the ball ..... Hail. Agreed. I dont like the fact that we got Stallworth taking up space on our roster and Robinson is sitting on the practice squad. It's time to see what these young guys can do. Also I am of the opinion that since big mike is out they should also bring up Royster. But maybe that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I'm excited about Paul's prospects for the future because the coaches seem to absolutely love him. It hasn't translated to many catches, but I'll give him some time to put everything together and get targeted a bit more to see what he can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeefJerky Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Niles Paul is looking to be a steal in the 5th round. Heres to hoping Hankerson will establish himself also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Agreed. I dont like the fact that we got Stallworth taking up space on our roster and Robinson is sitting on the practice squad. It's time to see what these young guys can do. Also I am of the opinion that since big mike is out they should also bring up Royster. But maybe that's just me. I think Robinson needs to stay on the PS. He did'nt show anything in preseason that would warrant a callup. We already have 8 WRs on the roster. Even if say we released Stallworth, I'd bring up a DL or OL before Robinson. With Santana inactive for a while, we still have 7 other WRs on gameday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.