frankez99 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 CSN: http://www.csnwashington.com/11/02/10/Redskins-Notes-Portis-Progressing/landing.html?blockID=344181&feedID=272 "Carter Feeling Comfortable The full-time outside linebacker experiment for Andre Carter is over, who is seeing time back at his true defensive end position. Even though it means he’s not a starter for the first time in his career, Carter said: “I am what I am. Had I learned the [3-4] scheme a long time ago, I would have been better at the position. But I’m older and have been playing defensive line my whole career. We made the adjustments and I’m doing what I do best.” Carter said he still attends the linebacker meetings because he is needed if an injury occurs like Brian Orakpo last week. “Andre’s done a good job with what we’ve asked him to do the last couple weeks,” defensive coordinator Jim Haslett said. “The numbers aren’t there but he rushed the quarterback about as good I’ve seen him do the last two weeks and those numbers will come if he keeps on working.” Rotoworld: http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=436 "The Redskins have begun moving Andre Carter back to defensive end in their 3-4 scheme. "I am what I am," said Carter. "Had I learned the [3-4] scheme a long time ago, I would have been better at the position. But I'm older and have been playing defensive line my whole career." Lorenzo Alexander has taken over at outside linebacker, and Carter is only an option there in an emergency situation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Bout damn time! Start Zo at the LB spot instead of Carter and have Carter rotate with Daniels and Carriker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoRUSupposed2Be Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Please take notes for Mr. Haslett, Kyle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djnominal Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Great Move Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c4man5282 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Hasn't he been playing DE the past 2 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Hasn't he been playing DE the past 2 games? Yes. This is old news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bay Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Yes. This is old news. At least it's not a rumor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warpath11 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 To be fair he has not played end in our base 3-4 (obviously way too small) he has played end in nickle and dime formation when we go to a 4 man front (just like Big Al). That is a good move by the staff since all Carter is good for is pass rushing with his hand in the dirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyHolt Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I want to know why we even bothered to try? At least we are correcting things but I wonder about some of the stuff we have done. I still question the need to go to the 3-4. I am no expert but the turnovers we have forced this year dont seem dependent on the 3-4 to me. The beauty of the 3-4 is the offense doesnt know who will rush the QB, pounding him forcing fumbles and bad throws aka turnovers. But they always knew it was Carter and Orakpo coming, because they suck in coverage. Now with just Orakpo, its better I imagine, but I still dont credit the 3-4 with Halls 5 INT's for instance. Or his or Buch's FF's. Nor any of the rest of them. Haynesworth being used right, and now Carter, maybe we will just stop killing ourselves and go back to the 4-3 proper. cant hurt factoring how teams are killing us in yards week after week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horton_Predator48 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Glad to see the coaches are making some changes and adjusting. I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusicCitySkin Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 He's obviously the best choice for DE in the nickel package. But don't be mislead into thinking this applies to the 3-4 package. it doesn't. A 3-4 end is typically a run-stopper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyUtah Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why did this take so long? I'm not trying to be an armchair GM or Coach, but why is it that some of the moves that Shanny has made, literally don't make rationale sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinzfever2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 We have been trying to tell coach this. Now stop trying to tell me Joey Galloway is the best receiver on the team. Thank! Hail! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why did this take so long?I'm not trying to be an armchair GM or Coach, but why is it that some of the moves that Shanny has made, literally don't make rationale sense? It shouldn't have. It was obvious pretty early that he showed no aptitude for the position at all. I'm all for giving things a try, but to keep running him out there in actual games after the display of ineptitude he showed at LB was foolish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWCREDSKINS Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Good that's where he should be and now maybe we can generate some more pass rush from someone other than Orakpo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Hasn't he been playing DE the past 2 games? I thought it was since the philly game... :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 we should've traded him in the offseason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a 3-4 defensive end nothing like the 4-3 version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikie Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a 3-4 defensive end nothing like the 4-3 version? as far as I understand it, we are using him as a DE only in nickle and dime (4-3) packages, so he is not in the game when we have the 3-4 base in... this drives me insane because it's just another piece of evidence that WE CAN'T RUN THE 3-4 now!!!!!!!!!!!!!! so carter and AH are at their natural positions and playing better than ever, but we aren't starting them because we stubbornly are trying to crowbar a 3-4 defense into 4-3 personnel... I have no issue with a transition to a 3-4, but I can not for the life of me understand why we have to run it when we don't have the roster yet to implement it... bill belichick (one of the innovators of the 3-4) came to NE and put in a 3-4, then realized he could not run it, switch back to the 4-3, drafted 3-4 linemen in the first round in 3 consecutive drafts, and then ran the 3-4....learn from him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 bill belichick (one of the innovators of the 3-4) Just to make a point. The 3-4 defense has been around along time. The 1972 Dolphins used a 3-4 defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why did this take so long?I'm not trying to be an armchair GM or Coach, but why is it that some of the moves that Shanny has made, literally don't make rationale sense? Shanahan believed he had the perfect size and athletic ability to play the position. Once again, he failed miserably in evaluating defense. Just as I feared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 When we got rid of Blache, I thought it would be end of trying to "mold" players to a specific scheme instead of using the players' strength to build schemes. It one has a particular scheme in mind, that should be a goal to work toward in drafts/offseason signings, not "molding." Hence, the Haynesworth debacle, Andre Carter, etc. One thing coaches can improve is technique in effecting turnovers, which they seem to have done. But changing a player who is suited/experienced in one style of play into something else is a recipe for disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4SB Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Carter is not a 3-4 DE, so pretty much we are taking one of our top defensive players from a year ago and making him a situational player (DE in nickle, dime). We should have dealt him when we had the chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homercles82 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 This board kills me. People posting that AC needed to play DE. People posting we needed to mix 3-4/4-3 looks. Now that the team is doing that people are hating on them for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurgundyBlog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I agree that it shouldn't have taken this long, but let's not get upset about this just because it should have happened sooner. Can't we just be glad it happened? You can blast our scheme-compatibility (based on theory) all you want, but the defense is not failing this year. While no one is mistaking us for the Steelers or Ravens, we are forcing turnovers at an astronomical rate (especially considering last year's output) and sending star player after star player to the hospital. To what standard are we holding Jim Haslett... perfection? We bend a little too much, but have played many good offenses, and even the "weaker" ones (StL, Detroit) are better than most people realize. In my opinion the defense, overall, has made a quantum leap from last year with literally ZERO significant personnel upgrades. As bad as our offense is (and the o-line in particular), we are LUCKY to be .500 with the first-half schedule we drew, and if it weren't for the frequent turnovers produced by Haslett's 3-4, we'd be worse. I wish Carter's proper role had been identified sooner, but they misjudged it. Now they're adapting, which I appreciate. With a little patience and continuity, the whole system will only improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.