redskins55 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Nope, I blame that partially on Carroll and the GM who signed him to that ridiculous contract last year. I say bring him in for Vet min., let Seattle pay the remaining portion of his contract this year. If he leaves next year then let him or sign him to a two year deal depending on how the CBA works out. Now I can work with that.. Excellent idea in my opinion.. But anything more would be destructively Deon Sanderous!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins2victory Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Do you guys think the decision will be made tonight, one way or the other?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brave Little Toaster Oven Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Moss/Housh/Galloway is a good receiving corps...hes a legitimate #2 possession receiver we havent had here in forever... and its a one year try out during a no cap year......this is a ****ing NO BRAINER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 ^^ Na, probably around 3' in the morning, that's normally how these things go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeen80 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Do you guys think the decision will be made tonight, one way or the other?? Doubtful. Dont stay up too late Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johns Bass Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Do you guys think the decision will be made tonight, one way or the other?? Nope. I think him and his agents are stringing teams along till he gets his best deal. Someone will sign him, so he can wait a few days. He does not need to start for anyone on opening day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskins55 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Overpay? Most likely would sign for vet minimum.Not washed up, seriously...did you even watch him play? I'm going to lose my mind reading this thread, some of you guys... Of course I watched him play last year.. I watched almost every game and he was nonexistent except for a few games! Please answer this... If he's not washed up then why did Seattle release him??? And if it's a decision between the Redskins and Raiders what makes you think he'll sign with us for the "vet Minimum"?? If he comes for the minimum fine, but some people are saying " make this happen by any means necessary" like the guy is what we've been missing. He's hardly that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Of course I watched him play last year.. I watched almost every game and he was nonexistent except for a few games! Please answer this... If he's not washed up then why did Seattle release him??? And if it's a decision between the Redskins and Raiders what makes you think he'll sign with us for the "vet Minimum"?? If he comes for the minimum fine, but some people are saying " make this happen by any means necessary" like the guy is what we've been missing. He's hardly that! I watched most of his games also and I'll just have to disagree with you on his presence. I've answered why he was released four times, but since you didn't read it, here we go again. They (the seahawks) totally overvalued him as a free agent a year ago and gave him a 5 year 40-million dollar contract. This is far more than he is worth and when they realized that, they took advantage of the CBA expiring and an uncapped year to cut him and get out from under that absurd contract. He would sign for the vet minimum because Seattle, regardless of where he goes, still would be required to pay him the difference and meet his salary of 7 million this year. If he signs for 810k or whatever the minimum is, they owe him 6,190,000. If he signs for 5 million for this year somewhere, they owe him 2 million. The point being that no matter where he goes, he makes 7 million because of Seattle. Also, I'm not one of the people saying "sign him whatever it takes!" because that's just as absurd as saying he's washed up. The man is a very solid veteran that is better than 5 of our current receivers. Edit: To address the Raiders portion. I'm not saying he's coming here or why he should choose one team over the other. I said before that if the Raiders offer him more, he'll go there. I'm simply saying the people who don't even want to look at him as an option are short-sighted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddyLeeGhostHunter Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 but when I read that he was being cut by Seattle who's only legit WRs on the team are Deon (tree) Branch, Golden (Donut) Tate, and Mike (no... the other Mike) Williams.. I knew there was something up with this guy. The Raiduh's released DeAngelo Hall. We should cut that guy as he was washed up a few years ago. VJ isn't on the market. Forget it. I followed him close last year and he was nowhere to be found except for a few games. Newsflash! The entire Seahawks team only won a few games last season. There's no wonder anyone on that entire team would be seen. Their starting offensive line rivaled ours for worst last season. Their starting quarterback was on a motorized cart for the better half of the season. Yet, Housh still put up the same numbers as Moss.Guess we should cut Moss too.:pfft: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Again I have to ask. How good can he be if the seahawks were willing to eat 7 million to cut him? What about those reports of "timing him with an hourglass"? If Shanahan checks him out and wants to sign him cool. I'll trust that he's worth a shot. But to me, something smells here and I'm afraid it's the smell of another big name bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McD5 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 This isn't even a question. You sign him first thing tomorrow morning. He is a very quality WR, and with McNabb in a real offense, can be fantastic. In addition to just being a great player, imagine if we don't sign him, and Moss gets injured for a few games this year. We would be totally screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddyLeeGhostHunter Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 like the guy is what we've been missing. Technically, he is what we've been missing. Exhibit A, 2009 Redskins season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottie Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Please answer this... If he's not washed up then why did Seattle release him??? Because Pete wants to bring back one of his old players in Williams instead of a guy who actually produced for his team last season? Dude reminds me too much of Spurrier with making a move like that. His moves have been very questionable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Of course I watched him play last year.. I watched almost every game and he was nonexistent except for a few games! I always love this argument. You are a Redskins fan, yet last year you watched all of Housh'es games and are an expert on Housh. That's gotta be one of the poorest message board arguments of all time. Uhhh no you didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dro89 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 i would sign housh then trade for jackson that way the WR core looks good until jackson comes back in week 6.. rotate either moss or housh in the slot run some 4 WR sets open up lanes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Again I have to ask. How good can he be if the seahawks were willing to eat 7 million to cut him? What about those reports of "timing him with an hourglass"?If Shanahan checks him out and wants to sign him cool. I'll trust that he's worth a shot. But to me, something smells here and I'm afraid it's the smell of another big name bust. You are totally missing the point that they are eating the 7 million to avoid being on the hook for more next year. It's clearing up their cap of a terrible contract they signed with him last year. It's not like they could have kept him on the roster this year than let him go next year with no repercussions. This was the best opportunity to get out from under the contract as a whole. (In 2009 he signed a 5 year 40-million dollar deal) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 This isn't even a question. You sign him first thing tomorrow morning.He is a very quality WR, and with McNabb in a real offense, can be fantastic. Then WHY did Seattle eat 7 mil to cut him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Then WHY did Seattle eat 7 mil to cut him? You sir, are going to drive me insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddyLeeGhostHunter Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 You sir, are going to drive me insane. :pfft: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNoles21 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 If we don't sign him to a monster contract ... then hes not a big name bust. He is a solid player to add to our weakest position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Again I have to ask. How good can he be if the seahawks were willing to eat 7 million to cut him? What about those reports of "timing him with an hourglass"?If Shanahan checks him out and wants to sign him cool. I'll trust that he's worth a shot. But to me, something smells here and I'm afraid it's the smell of another big name bust. As has been said numerous times...the Seahawks are over hauling the entire team. The Seahawks had a terrible long term contract with TJ. They decide to take a one year hit of $7 million, instead of a multi-year hit. We are not asking TJ to come in and go long on every play. We are not asking TJ to come in and be our savior. We are asking TJ to come in, run a 8 yard route on 3rd and 7. We are asking TJ to come in and use his 6'2" frame in the red zone. TJ is a good fit for us. It is irrelevant how he fit in with Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostyj Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Then WHY did Seattle eat 7 mil to cut him? See above post. Also, his numbers are not far off from Santana's. Why NOT pick him up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Then WHY did Seattle eat 7 mil to cut him? Same reason we flushed players this year to get rid of the salary cap going into collective bargaining. It's not rocket science. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Same reason if we cut Haynesworth another team running a 4-3 would consider signing him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoskins Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Seattle cut him because they feel they have young receivers they want to develop. We do not. Thomas has has a 'b', 's' and 't' already and we're just waiting to see if he buys a 'u' this year. Armstrong would be a miracle if he worked out (hope he does, but it is still a long shot) And all of our receivers except one were beat in camp by a 38-year old grey beard. TJ doesn't have to be a world beater for us, all he has to do is beat Galloway in practice and we become a better team. Why? Because TJ outperformed everyone on our roster last year except Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.