FatboysSkins Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Hey ES how do yall feel about this. Me personnally hate the fact of TO becoming a Redskin, but the love the thought that this could make our offense more dynamic as ever.:logo: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors#4536 httpC://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/free-agency/shanahan-interested-in-terrell.html http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d81761050/McNabb-from-D-C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blindlywewander Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 :ols::ols: NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iced Coffee Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 :ols: at the thought of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Could someone post the article? Now is not the time to be respecting ESPN and their Insider crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeen80 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Not a chance in hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dro89 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 no way i like our receiving core now but if i had to add someone. brandon marshall COME ON DOWNNNN!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 I fall for that link every time. I click on it expecting to see the full story and bam...I have to pay for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 From ESPN Insider: Several years back, the Philadelphia Eagles were in the Super Bowl with Donovan McNabb as their star QB and Terrell Owens as his top target. When McNabb was still with the Eagles earlier this offseason, the team was not considered to be in the mix to sign Owens again, whereas the Washington Redskins had been mentioned as a possible destination for No. 81. Now that McNabb is with the Redskins, the chatter has begun to pick up that perhaps the team will go after Owens, too. Although, there was a report from Chris Russell of 106.7 FM in Washington that a high-ranking Redskins official is opposed to the idea of signing the WR. A recent report said that an offer could still come from the Cincinnati Bengals, but that it likely wouldn't be for much more than $1.5 million for a single season. It'll be interesting to see if either of those teams calls the other's bluff, or waits until after the draft to target Owens. We also wouldn't be altogether shocked to see the Oakland Raiders or Jacksonville Jaguars take a look at Owens either, but that's mainly speculation at this point, and it's possible the Owens-to-Oakland ship has already sailed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 I was pretty against TO in the past but I don't have a problem with it anymore. If we're going to throw $40 million in guarantees at Haynesworth and sign Larry Johnson then we might as well get the trifecta with TO. He talks too much but anyone that thinks he's a bigger problem than Larry Johnson is delusional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockville Redskin Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 After McNabb became a Skin I wouldn't totally rule it out but we are attempting to trade a me player in Beached Whale Haynesworth and it just doesn't seem realistic. We need players that are all on the same page. ESPN charges $2.50 for that crap? Is there a diarrhea avatar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatboysSkins Posted April 7, 2010 Author Share Posted April 7, 2010 I don't have Insider but I did add the Washington Post link talking about the same thing:logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus87 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 T.O. isn't even "dynamic" or that good anymore. I'd much rather roll with Moss and see what happens with Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly in a real offense with a real QB now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 gotta pass. bring him in would turn this into the "mcnabb and TO show" instead of the our team turning a new leaf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VRIEL1 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Bring on T.O. When Moss is on the field he gets double teamed. Plus he's not a true #1 WR even though we have treated him as such. When T.O.'s on the field he is double teamed for his potential. Teams can't double everyone. Which means more zone defense and more open spaces for Cooley and Davis to pick a part. In the mean time hopefully Thomas, Kelly, and Mitchell step up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Why the hell not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfWashington Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADF Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 McNabb and TO may have buried the hatchet, but I doubt McNabb would like to be teammates with him again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 ^^^ :ols: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Ooh, please do. :munchout: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cowboy Bamma Rocker Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 As entertaining as that would be, I think that would only further hinder the development of thomas and kelly. T.O. is too selfish and we need the youngins to become a critical part of our offense. On another note, at least T.O. would come cheap and has a history with McNabb... however controversial it may be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatboysSkins Posted April 7, 2010 Author Share Posted April 7, 2010 I just added another link for the NFL Network with Rich Easian (spelling) hinting/joking toward a McNabb/Kevin Curtis reunion (AKA TO). Pretty funny but it says alot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 I just added another link for the NFL Network with Rich Easian (spelling) hinting/joking toward a McNabb/Kevin Curtis reunion (AKA TO). Pretty funny but it says alot. Why AKA T.O.? I'm pretty sure he was actually talking about Kevin Curtis. He just built up the suspense so that everyone would think he was about to talk about TO. It was a semi-joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskins55 Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 If you saw the interview with McNabb and Rich Eisen I think you can read between the lines and see that McNabb doesn't want T.O anywhere near Washington D.C http://www.nfl.com/videos/washington-redskins/09000d5d81761050/McNabb-from-D-C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.