Skins_Win_Again Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 http://msn.foxsports.com/video/NFL?vid=316591a8-e715-46a3-b19a-543c8b6f8ebc Now this is a video. but basiclly Glazer says the obvious about mike being hired. However, he also adds that hes the head of football operations as well as the coach. He understands theres already bruce allen however, its believed that mike was given 100% controll. bruce allen is still the gm btw its just mike has the controll now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think the way this will work. Mike will set the rosters for game day, and decide who needs to be cut or traded, Allen will take care of the business side of things, and coordinate with scouts to find the players mike says he needs. That's how it should be anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 :wavetowel I'm now drinking the koolaid :40oz: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins_Win_Again Posted January 6, 2010 Author Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think the way this will work. Mike will set the rosters for game day, and decide who needs to be cut or traded, Allen will take care of the business side of things, and coordinate with scouts to find the players mike says he needs. That's how it should be anyways. yeah mike was given controll over player personal and picking who he wants and bruce is there to just make the contracts and handle buisness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think it will be a pretty typical set up. Allen will scout and assemble the players, probably do the drafting with coach's input. Coach will say who makes the team. At least, that's how I hope it pans out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins_Win_Again Posted January 6, 2010 Author Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think it will be a pretty typical set up. Allen will scout and assemble the players, probably do the drafting with coach's input. Coach will say who makes the team. At least, that's how I hope it pans out. according to jay glazer mike is doin the scouting and drafting lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Probos Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 As long as Danny's not mucking up football-centric decisions it's all fine.......... Until it all goes bad of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Green Fan Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I thought total control meant just that, total control. Like when Marty was here, he had total control and that meant that he was the one making the draft picks. Gotta say that does scare me a bit, I prefer the more traditional set up where the GM picks who comes and the HC picks who leaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Well, that would have me a little worried. I don't mind if Shanny gets to look over the scouting reports and makes his preferences known, he does need to get the kind of player he needs, but I prefer a little more division of resources and perspectives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dockeryfan Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 100% control for Shanahan is a problem for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endzone_dave Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 How successful have other coaches been who were responsible for making personnel decisions along with their coaching duties? How many of them have won a Super Bowl recently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Other than Belicheat... not very. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Green Fan Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I'll repeat what I said in the other thread, this system has not worked well in the majority of instances. Now we have brought in a guy who has had a very bad history regarding personnel moves which is why he is no longer in Denver. Not convinced? Look at some of the high draft picks he had in Denver that flopped. Players like Marucs Nash, Ashley Lelie, Willie Middlebrooks, George Foster and Jarvis Moss were all first-round picks that busted. Source: http://peteprisco.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6315047/19392624 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonoman Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 100% control is just what the Redskins coach needs.The player does his best or He is gone.What is wrong with that? On the field there can only be one boss the COACH!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgraw238 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I'll repeat what I said in the other thread, this system has not worked well in the majority of instances. Now we have brought in a guy who has had a very bad history regarding personnel moves which is why he is no longer in Denver.Not convinced? Look at some of the high draft picks he had in Denver that flopped. Players like Marucs Nash, Ashley Lelie, Willie Middlebrooks, George Foster and Jarvis Moss were all first-round picks that busted. Source: http://peteprisco.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6315047/19392624 Look at Denvers 2006 draft, it's pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Patriots and Eagles are setup this way. In fact, it sounds pretty much like the structure employed by Gibbs II. Gibbs' approach was collaborative and inclusive just because that's how he wanted to run things, but he could have chosen to go the dictatorial route a la Marty if he had wanted. The faces have changed, but the structure remains the same. Fine with me. People are really weird about the structure and titles and whatnot with this team. None of it matters if they can't find a solid long-term solution at QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexterSackMachine Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Any coach should have the final say on who is on his team or else you have a Zorn/Portis situation, where the player can blast the coach publicly and still be starting. Players have to be slightly afraid of the coach or his leadership becomes ineffective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
50GutCheck Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 His time as the Redskins' HC will springboard Shanahan into the Pro Football HOF, mark my words! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexterSackMachine Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 Patriots and Eagles are setup this way. In fact, it sounds pretty much like the structure employed by Gibbs II. Gibbs' approach was collaborative and inclusive just because that's how he wanted to run things, but he could have chosen to go the dictatorial route a la Marty if he had wanted.The faces have changed, but the structure remains the same. Fine with me. People are really weird about the structure and titles and whatnot with this team. None of it matters if they can't find a solid long-term solution at QB. That's my biggest disappointment at Gibbs 2.0, he had the power to shut Snyder out and get rid of Vinny, but he didn't. He let Dan and Vinny think they were really helping out, and so when he left they thought they could just follow Gibbs' pattern and do it on their own. That led to a virtual repeat of the Steve Spurrier era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Fried Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think the way this will work. Mike will set the rosters for game day, and decide who needs to be cut or traded, Allen will take care of the business side of things, and coordinate with scouts to find the players mike says he needs. That's how it should be anyways. Hopefully Allen has some input to stop any stupid ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I think the way this will work. Mike will set the rosters for game day, and decide who needs to be cut or traded, Allen will take care of the business side of things, and coordinate with scouts to find the players mike says he needs. That's how it should be anyways. That's what I'm thinking too. Mike will tell Allen the guys he wants and Allen will find a way to bring them in. Danny's role will be writing the checks for these players. I agree that Shanahan should decide who he wants on the roster anyway. I'm sure Allen will have a part in that, but ultimately the coach should be able to decide on the players he's coaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrFan Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 First Allen had the authority, now Shanahan, guess who's next. :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 First Allen had the authority, now Shanahan, guess who's next. :hysterical: Snyder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 That's what I'm thinking too. Mike will tell Allen the guys he wants and Allen will find a way to bring them in. Danny's role will be writing the checks for these players. I agree that Shanahan should decide who he wants on the roster anyway. I'm sure Allen will have a part in that, but ultimately the coach should be able to decide on the players he's coaching. Ok, what if Mike suddenly he decides he wants to pay top dollar for another Courtney Brown? Does Allen have to cede that decision to him or does he have veto power? If not, these recent moves don't look as good as we thought they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway66 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I thought total control meant just that, total control. Like when Marty was here, he had total control and that meant that he was the one making the draft picks. Gotta say that does scare me a bit, I prefer the more traditional set up where the GM picks who comes and the HC picks who leaves. Why would you want Bruce picking Mikes players?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.