dockeryfan Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I saw, and continue to see, some posters still thinking that Snyder is a good owner. So let's see it in numbers. Simple question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuji869 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 NA, I think the Redskins under Danny Boy and all the Dumb ***** decisions he has made speaks for itself..... :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I voted no, but that doesn't mean that I don't think he can't be a good owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Is this a joke? Would a good owner have a career losing record? 78 wins and 88 losses .469 winning percentage under Snyder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreciating Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 The money he spends makes him a good owner. The way he spends it makes him a bad owner. His money won't change, but his ways will. Therefore, I vote good owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsNation Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Right now and for the past 10 years he has been a pisspoor owner more often then not. I hope and pray that he becomes a better owner and maybe one day is even considered good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 At this point in time, he is a complete failure Are the Redskins better off then they were before he took over the team? No, the Redskins are far worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HigSkin Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 You need to add a couple of "yes" selections to make this fair: "yes, but he has made mistakes and needs to learn from those mistakes" or "yes, he wants to win but he could do a lot better" or "yes, he means well but is doing it all wrong" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 The money he spends makes him a good owner. The way he spends it makes him a bad owner. His money won't change, but his ways will. Therefore, I vote good owner. I understand that you HOPE Snyder will change but what has Snyder shown you to indicate that the way he operates a pro football franchise WILL change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsBry Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 He could move the team to Mexico City in the middle of the night and leave a full page FU letter to be printed in the next day's Post and there will still be a handful that thinks he walks on water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 "Yes, he means well but he is doing it wrong." is my vote I rather have an owner who is willing to spend big $$$ to win rather than the cheap Tampa owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Walton Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Good owner = wins, treats people with respect, likable personality, fan friendly, understands what it takes to win, has the organizational skills to make it happen. Dan Snyder = none of the above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdlives Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Snyder wants to win, but he wants to win on his terms, therefore, his methods are faulty. He can go along for the ride, but he should stay in the backseat and let a GM and Head Coach drive the bus and ride shotgun respectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz4Life12 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 should be a public poll. i want to see who the donks are that voted yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander PK Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I think he ultimately wants what the fans want. The problem, is that he thinks he knows how to take us there. He doesn't, and the best thing he could do is find some Football people to run the Football side of things, and get out of the way. Do what owners are supposed to do, spend the money on what the Football people tell him to spend it on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkskin Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 The money he spends makes him a good owner. The way he spends it makes him a bad owner. His money won't change, but his ways will. Therefore, I vote good owner. Are you being serious? His ways will change? When will that be, 2025? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTotalPackage Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 "Yes, he means well but he is doing it wrong." is my voteI rather have an owner who is willing to spend big $$$ to win rather than the cheap Tampa owner. i wish our owner was more like that. one that prefers to build cheaply through the draft and not spend beaucoup bucks in free agency; which can poison a locker room. an owner who hires a GM to make difficult decisions like letting go of aging and deteriorating veterans before the team is affected by the dropoff in performance and replacing them with new, fresh talent. screw this current moneyball method. i want it done the right way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flave1969 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Simply put, the answer is no. So many reasons why this is so and they have been covered in many threads. Danny makes a very healthy profit out this club and its fanbase. I find it extremely annoying that the only argument put forward for him is that he spends money when the reality is far more ambiguous and in many ways false. People need to stop making excuses for him. He is responsible for every facet of this franchise as we see it now and should bare that responsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HigSkin Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Is this a joke? Would a good owner have a career losing record? 78 wins and 88 losses .469 winning percentage under Snyder Using only winning percentages doesn't reflect correctly. For example thru 2008, Al Davis has a .569 percentage while the Rooney's were .502. I don't think anyone would say Davis is a better owner than the Steelers family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichmondRedskin88 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Snyder is A) Ego maniac Franchise destroyer C) Pompous windbag D) Disrespectful jerk who castrates people's dignity E) A nice guy F) All of the above G) All of the above except E. Who the hell put that one in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 no at this moment, cause i beleive the man has good intentions however He is very very very fatally flawed.. Now he fires Cerrato this season then there is hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suze109 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Dan will never be considered a "good owner" until he hires a REAL GM, gets out of his way, and just signs the checks and sits in his box and counts his money. FIRE VINNY!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jofizz Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I voted good owner. Now hear me out before you blast my decision. I don't have any problems with Dan, other than the fact that he has given Vinny Cerrato a job for the last decade. Dan cuts the big checks. He will pay whatever it takes to make this team better, a luxury that a lot of professional sports teams do not have (see the Washington Nationals under the Lerners thus far). Lets not take that for granted. The guy that tells him who to pay, and who to bring in is the problem. All Snyder needs to do is exterminate the ****roach that is Vinny Cerrato, hire a true GM, and sign the dotted lines, and all should be well. Danny is a Redskins fan just like all of us, and some of the claims that he does not care how the team performs are absolutely bogus. The man wants us to win as much as the next die-hard. He just needs some help getting things where they need to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Walton Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Danny is a Redskins fan just like all of us, and some of the claims that he does not care how the team performs are absolutely bogus. He just needs some help getting things where they need to be. I don't agree with this sentiment. I believe that Dan's priorities with the Redskins are - 1) Make more money then anyone in the NFL 2) Make more money then Jerry Jones 3) Win games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kramdizzle Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 need to add more option in there, like yes he does a good job spending money to bring in players, but he needs to stop his involvment in player drafting. JUST STROKE THE CHECKS DANNY BOY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.