The_Godfather Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 3. as I clearly labeled .... "unconfirmed rumor" You got a PM from Jessica Simpson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAILSKINSNYC Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 why not put brennan on IR and put Daniel on the practice squad...allows you to keep an extra position player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 why not put brennan on IR and put Daniel on the practice squad...allows you to keep an extra position player. If JC and TC get hurt in the same game the team is screwed anyway. Put ARE back there and run the option baby!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toe Jam Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 1. this is not a joke (at least on my part)"[/b] Oh I know. However.. some of these other clowns are hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 5, 2009 Author Share Posted September 5, 2009 You got a PM from Jessica Simpson? ????? ***Edit*** NM, I just got the joke.... I have a below freezing temp. IQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickyshooZ Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 why not put brennan on IR and put Daniel on the practice squad...allows you to keep an extra position player. While unlikely that it comes down to needing a #3 to step in, it's too risky to not have one, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WALEOVECHKIN Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Whats the rule about teams having a third QB? Isn't it a roster exception, so maybe the Daniel to PS and Colt to IR would work...lemme see if I can dig up the rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggosMohawk Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 In terms of roster management, this doesn't make any sense to me. Colt on IR means Colt can't practice... period. I don't know if even one-on-one with positional coaches after organized team practice is ok. Chase to PS, Colt as #3 gets the best of both worlds. Both guys can participate in weekly practice. Unless the Skins really think Chase would get snatched onto a roster once the QB injury dominos start falling... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toe Jam Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 You got a PM from Jessica Simpson? If Bubba is getting PM's from Jessica Simpson then he just became my new best friend considering we live in the same city.:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WALEOVECHKIN Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 found it: Seventeen years ago (1991) the third-quarterback rule was instituted to enable teams to have an emergency quarterback available who was not on the 45-man game-day active roster, since many teams, for strategic purposes, only carried two quarterbacks on their game-day roster. Everybody thinks they understand the NFL's "third-quarterback" rule. But do they? The rule states that if a third quarterback is inserted before the fourth quarter, a team's first two quarterbacks cannot be used in the game at any position. Another aspect of the rule is sometimes misunderstood. It is a coach's decision as to whether a third quarterback will be used. The active quarterbacks do not have to be injured for a team to use its third quarterback. So if Campbell and Collins both get injured then a third QB who wouldn't count against the 53 man can be used. But the other two QBs have restrictions on when they can re-enter the game, but if both are knocked out of the game then its no problem.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 ];6710241']So long as Colt recovers' date=' this could be very good.This gives him another season to learn our system, while still allowing us to develop Chase. Collins is Campbell's backup anyways, so we're not losing too much. Plus, if we were to see Colt playing this season anyways, it would probably be because the season was gone anyways.[/quote'] it would not give colt another season in the offense. If placed on IR, colt would not be allowed to practice at all with the team.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 You got a PM from Jessica Simpson? I think bubba got shots for that :yes:... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 it would not give colt another season in the offense. If placed on IR, colt would not be allowed to practice at all with the team.... I think he is saying he can study the playbook. The third QB isn't really taking all that many snaps in practice anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I honestly don't care which of the 2 is #3, so long as we somehow keep both of them until next year.C-squared has about $5 worth of trade value between the both of them right now and no matter how Jason plays I think there's a pretty big chance that he's gone at the end of the season (either by his choice or ours). Soooooo, keep both kids and let them fight it out in camp next year, be it for a #2 spot or a legit #3 spot. Hopefully at that point, with 2 and 3 years of experience, one will show real potential and development and we won't have to spend yet another draft pick (or 10) on a leftover quarterback. This is a very well thought out post. TC isn't going to last forever, JC might/might not be here, and neither are ready to play. So, flip a coin, one spends the entire year on the inactive list, the other on IR, and we're done. btw, I think BLC is right, no practicing if you're on IR. However, Gibbs won a bunch of SBs by stashing people away on IR. Would be an interesting move. I'm not sure what the reaction of the Cult would be. But I'm not going to stir the pot. I would expect "Oh, poor Colt, he had the job then got injured and he'll win the job next year" as the predominant thought. I'm not sure I entirely agree with that. Tomorrow is going to be very interesting to see if this completely unconfirmed rumor is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Complete Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 What is the criteria for IR? I mean, if he isn't hurt that bad, can they really do this? To answer my own question... yes they can... NFL rules A team may place a player on injured reserve (reserve/injured list ) who, due to injury, is "not immediately available for participation with a club". These players may not practice or return to the Active List in the same season that they are placed on injured reserve. IMHO this would be a good move. This way we can keep both these young QBs for next year and let them battle it out once Todd and maybe Jason are gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_RedskinsGirly_X Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 WAIT ok now im confused so is Colt gonna be playing or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 To answer my own question... yes they can...NFL rules A team may place a player on injured reserve (reserve/injured list ) who, due to injury, is "not immediately available for participation with a club". These players may not practice or return to the Active List in the same season that they are placed on injured reserve. IMHO this would be a good move. This way we can keep both these young QBs for next year and let them battle it out once Todd and maybe Jason are gone. Right, so we know Colt is going to miss a couple days of practice, so that might be all they need. Hmmm. Well dug up on the official rule. Also confirmation that an IR player can't practice with the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankez99 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 "WAIT ok now im confused so is Colt gonna be playing or not" Regardless if this is a true rumor or not; your answer: NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Thanks for the info, bubba. Bummer to see Colt this way, even if I was more of a Daniel fan. We know he'll be back though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadium-Armory Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 found it:So if Campbell and Collins both get injured then a third QB who wouldn't count against the 53 man can be used. But the other two QBs have restrictions on when they can re-enter the game, but if both are knocked out of the game then its no problem.... No, that 3rd quarterback is on on the 53 man roster, but not on the 45 man active game day roster - different things. So its not like you could bring a guy off the practice squad as your 3rd on game day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 This is about as likely as JC being named MVP.I understand we have some room temperature iq members here, but this is absurd. Not really. It's actually quite feasible. But from someone who truthfully believes that Ladell Betts is the savior...well, how could I expect any less? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_RedskinsGirly_X Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 He better play or im gonna upset Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinswego Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Hooray Chase!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modazfuk Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 hahahahaha Bubba's attempt at mocking the other dude who posted about the Collin's rumor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikie Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 if colt is seriously injured, the move makes all the sense in the world (taking for granted we see potential in both young QBs), this way they are both guaranteed on the roster next year... if colt is not injured that badly, then I don't understand how this could be true... colt would not be able to practice with the team and we'd be unnecessarily stunting his growth but I can't see colt or his agent agreeing to go on IR unless it was legit... he'd get this year's salary but that's also assuming NO ONE would take a shot at him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.