Fifty Gut Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 POSTED 6:03 a.m. EDT; LAST UPDATED 6:36 a.m. EDT, March 30, 2007 'SKINS MEETING WITH RUSSELL MEANS NOTHING Len Pasquarelli of ESPN.com, who used to have Redskins' exec Vinny Cerrato on speed dial until Len (as legend goes) went bonkos on Cerrato after he didn't spoon feed the scoop regarding the return of coach Joe Gibbs to ESPN.com, has periodically been taking gratuitous shots at the 'Skins ever since. This time around, Len is using a standard pre-draft visit with quarterback JaMarcus Russell to suggest that it might be more than mere due diligence. "t could represent legitimate interest in Russell -- whose recent campus workout was impressive -- and possible unrest with Campbell," Pasquarelli says. It isn't. NFL teams are permitted by rule to bring in up to 30 members of the draft class. They'll also be bringing in running back Adrian Peterson, and others. So Len (or anyone else) could proclaim: "It could represent legitimate interest in Peterson -- whose recent campus workout was impressive -- and possible unrest with Clinton Portis." And does the visit of Joe Thomas mean that they've grown dissatisfied with Chris Samuels? And could the arrival of Brady Quinn mean that they're bracing for a Manning-versus-Leaf debate in their effort to replace Campbell? The Redskins are simply doing their homework, in the unlikely event that Russell slides into their laps. Since they have no selections from rounds two through four, the 'Skins don't have the draft-pick ammo to make a move north. And they likely couldn't take the cap hit that result from trading multiple players. Two years ago, quarterback Aaron Rodgers unexpectedly slid from the potential No. 1 overall selection to the Packers, at No. 24. We've heard on multiple occasions over the past two years that the Packers pounced on the potential replacement for Brett Favre, but that they simply hadn't done a full pre-draft workup on him because they never dreamed that he'd be available. The better approach is to be ready for anything. So why not take full advantage of the rule that lets a team bring in up to 30 guys? The fact that the 'Skins tend to spare no expense also could help to make that first impression a very good one, making the player inclined to consider Washington when he hits free agency. And, after all, free agency is the "real" draft for the Redskins. - PFT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHYSTER411 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 That's my favorite thing about PFT. That they calll out sprortswriters like that is just hilarious. They have a special place in their heart for Len P. too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMetal Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Well said. Glad to see someone else is willing to expose Fatty's negative agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fwo40 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 POSTED 6:03 a.m. EDT; LAST UPDATED 6:36 a.m. EDT, March 30, 2007 'SKINS MEETING WITH RUSSELL MEANS NOTHING [/size][/font] [/left] Two years ago, quarterback Aaron Rodgers unexpectedly slid from the potential No. 1 overall selection to the Packers, at No. 24. We've heard on multiple occasions over the past two years that the Packers pounced on the potential replacement for Brett Favre, but that they simply hadn't done a full pre-draft workup on him because they never dreamed that he'd be available. The better approach is to be ready for anything. So why not take full advantage of the rule that lets a team bring in up to 30 guys? The fact that the 'Skins tend to spare no expense also could help to make that first impression a very good one, making the player inclined to consider Washington when he hits free agency. - PFT To those of us that pause and breathe before getting excited about a player's visit this comes as no surprise......however, it is nice to see an example of why it's important to do your homework on top players in the draft regardless of what their position is.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I've explained this portion of the rift with Lenny for a while here. There's more to it involving the Washington Times, but, the agenda has always been there. This is just the first time someone has put the legend well known into a forum read by more than Redskin fans . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I've explained this portion of the rift with Lenny for a while here. There's more to it involving the Washington Times, but, the agenda has always been there. This is just the first time someone has put the legend well known into a forum read by more than Redskin fans . What happened with the Times...as if we need more of a reason to hate Fatassarelli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 The Redskins are simply doing their homework, Huh. But I thought I was just being a homer for saying that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the krabber Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Huh. But I thought I was just being a homer for saying that. Homered if you do, Homered if you dont... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffSchmeff Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I've explained this portion of the rift with Lenny for a while here. There's more to it involving the Washington Times, but, the agenda has always been there. This is just the first time someone has put the legend well known into a forum read by more than Redskin fans . That's the best part about it. I know for a fact I've heard ESPN personalities say on radio that they like to read PFT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poteet Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I've talked to a buddy of mine about Lenny P's disdain for the Skins for two years now. He never agreed with me... Pastabelly's article yesterday confirmed it yet again, and my buddy is finally starting to come around. Thanks for posting this... it is nice to see that there are certain individuals and sites that will expose the truth when it comes to the personal agendas and bias of sportswriters, no matter how much money they make and no matter what network they work for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 This is great. Some actual perspective. Sweeeeeeeet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouvan59 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Does anybody have a list of other teams that Russell met or is scheduled to meet with? I know there were over 100 NFL personnel guys there at his pro day. I'd love to see if someone like New England or Indy did but with them it's just thorough preparation. I'm sure if we don't draft him Lenny the Hut will come back and say we desperately tried to move up to get him but because we foolishly traded away all our draft picks didn't have the ammunition to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggs43 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Wow a respectable article from PFT !! If the Gibbs story is true, and that's the reason Len P takes shots at the Skins, that's just pathetic. Cry me a river Lenny, and learn how to do your job properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Why do people focus on debunking local writers when you've got this guy? You could sticky a thread on him and I bet by the time the 07 season is over. 60%-75% of everything he writes will be found to be untrue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooley4President Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Good article. I always figured he hated us because we limited the servings at the buffet in the press box or something.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Lenny's hatred for the Skins precedes the Gibbs scoop, if I recall correctly, but it's for roughly that reason. It might even revolve around the Spurrier hiring. Basically, he was ticked off that Vinny didn't do his job for him, which meant he had read CNNSI and Foxsports to get scoops. That's a lot of work when you're trying to microwave 6 beef, beef & beef burritos and deep fry an ostrich for an mid-morning snack. Give the guy a break -- he's BUSY!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasRoane Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 What happened with the Times... I missed out on that too. Art? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins4eva Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Lenny P should really not be allowed to cover the skins--or in the alternative, he should just be fired. It's just a complete joke that he can get away with crap like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSF Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Huh. But I thought I was just being a homer for saying that. :laugh: You and me both bro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 ESPN should stop pretending he's a reporting, and start admitting he's an opinion writer. You do that, and then he can rant on whatever and people won't be confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 ESPN should stop pretending he's a reporting, and start admitting he's an opinion writer. You do that, and then he can rant on whatever and people won't be confused. I think it's funny that all of these sports sites call these guys experts. WTF have they done to become experts? I go to school for several years, then work in my field for 15 years and don't get to call myself an expert. What exactly is Pasta an expert of anyway? I know the only time I'd ever consult Pasta as an expert of any field would be when I am in need of an all you can eat Buffet or if I was ever in the market for a cholesterol test kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterwagen Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 ESPN should stop pretending he's a reporting, and start admitting he's an opinion writer. You do that, and then he can rant on whatever and people won't be confused.I've honestly always thought of him as a commentator, and not a real reporter. Remember, "My bet is, by the time all is said done, he'll be just another ordinary joe." :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman#21 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I knew he hated us but wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Its very rare to find a well though out article from PFT, heres to hoping, like our FO, they are changing philosophies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 I thought it was common knowledge that Lenny P was pissed over the Gibbs scoop :whoknows: Regardless, Lenny P is usually good at reporting news, he does have lots of sources which are dead on, its his opinions which are garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.