JimmiJo Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 It is I believe, but not by much. We did nothing to put fear in anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSteve Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Ramsey didn't even play the last 3 QTRS. He had more passing yds by far with less completions in one QTR of play than Brunell did for 3. I think our offense would have got rolling but for some reason Gibbs never put Ramsey back in. Here's hoping he was just playing it safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted September 11, 2005 Author Share Posted September 11, 2005 Ramsey didn't even play the last 3 QTRS. He had more passing yds by far with less completions in one QTR of play than Brunell did for 3. I think our offense would have got rolling but for some reason Gibbs never put Ramsey back in. Here's hoping he was just playing it safe. I think Brunell did not throw a pass for most the third quarter so you really can't judge: P. Ramsey 6/11 105 0 1 M. Brunell 8/14 70 0 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNeverDie Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 We got plenty of total yardage against a pretty good defense...but for gods sake we need to score some TD's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThornWithin Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Santana moss looked pretty good. I have sunday ticket, so I watched the whole game. Regardless, I don't think your team has improved on offense nearly as much as some people on this board, with all the 20+ point predictions from around here. Maybe a little though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho fan Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I think Ramsey is still the starter. Brunell kept us in the game which is great! Game ball to the Defense. Imagine where the Skins would be without this fantasic D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khun Kao Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I agree with "TheSteve". We didn't have the points (the determining factor in NFL games), but we completely DOMINATED the Bears. We only failed in punching it in..... NO NFL team can underestimate us.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A.M.F. Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 We got plenty of total yardage against a pretty good defense...but for gods sake we need to score some TD's. Yes, PLEASE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted September 11, 2005 Author Share Posted September 11, 2005 Santana moss looked pretty good.I have sunday ticket, so I watched the whole game. Regardless, I don't think your team has improved on offense nearly as much as some people on this board, with all the 20+ point predictions from around here. Maybe a little though. I agree after today's game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 With Ramsey in the game- Yes, it looks better. Brunell- No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I'm not sure how many more games we can win scoring 9 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormy Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 With Patrick Ramsey at the helm, it has big play potential (as well as higher risk of the occasionally painful TO). With Brunell at the helm, and Gibbs and his OC running the show, you have the most archaic, antiquated offense in the NFL. Thankfully, a healthier, improved OL and some workhorse efforts by Portis and Betts helped us net enough FGs to have a chance to win. Ramsey hit some big intermediate-deep passes, including one called back on a third down for illegal motion, not to mention a bogus call on what should have been a TD to Cooley. With Brunell, this will be the lowest scoring, lowest yards per play offense in the NFL again, and Portis will eventually be ground to dust as teams key exclusively on him knowing Brunell can't beat them for anything more than 10 yards ... not so with Patrick. Brunell is still at his league worst Yards Per Attempt rate, completely negating any explosiveness Moss/Patten potentially bring. thank heavens for Gregg Williams, our D, and the incompetence of the Bears for this victory... as Joe and Brunell's unproductive conservativism could easily have lost it for us. Looks like a replay of Brunell's opening day victory over Tampa last years, minus the INT they called back against him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtyler42 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I like the look of the O w/Brunell in the game, when we got down he took us right down the field and if not for Cooley not getting deep enough into the endzone it would of been a TD drive... To answer your question yes it has improved, The line played well the WR were open and got seperation, The RB ran hard we just need to get more production from the QB as well as less turnovers from that position... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuposse87 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 We can move the ball better, we seem to be more efficient. I think Brunnel was told to stay with the ground game but I thought Ramsey was able to move ok when he was out there. I'm still fukkin ticked off about that clothesline on him. The bears do have a great defense so I don't think we have to be worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 post game gibbs is saying the trainers had doubt the injury was on the neck. Patrick said he was ok but Gibbs felt it best to keep him out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 many of us knew the Bears D was no slouch - I believe we would have been more agressive if Ramsey had not gotten hurt. I am most disappointed in the bad calls and non-calls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Wow the score in this poll resembles a game I just watched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSteve Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Well Gibbs confirmed in his post game interview that Ramsey was only kept out to play it safe. He had a kneck injury and Gibbs was concerned about letting him back in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted September 11, 2005 Author Share Posted September 11, 2005 I'm not sure how many more games we can win scoring 9 points. At least 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I think some people need to chill the heck out. Maybe as long as we were getting first downs he didn't want to risk putting Patrick in and getting hurt REALLY bad. Maybe he was worried that Patrick may come back a little gun shy. Turnovers and an iffy pass intf. call on a TD are what made this game so tight. We avoid most of those BAD turnovers and penalties we win this game 20-0. Last of all some of you guys need to shake that loser mentality. We're 1-0 no matter how we did it. We had a few of these types of games against bad teams in our SB 17 year so chill a little. Enjoy the win...no matter how ugly it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hands11 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 It is I believe, but not by much. We did nothing to put fear in anyone. First game. Bears have a nasty defence. We be better WR. We have better plays for Portis. Gibbs isnt afraid to us Betts. We have a healthy FG kicker. Brunell can lead us to steady drives. Ramsey can make the bigger plays. We are better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colesfan05 Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Our offense is improved. I think Moss had something like 81 yards in the 1st quarter w/ Ramsey. And Portis was at about 5.8 ypc against a good D. But what about our Defense, the bears wouldn't have had anything if it wasn't for Brown's fumble. The problem with our offense this game was Brunell really. We only completed one pass to Moss after Ramsey left. You gotta love Moss' ability to make something happen after the catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 I like the look of the O w/Brunell in the game, when we got down he took us right down the field and if not for Cooley not getting deep enough into the endzone it would of been a TD drive...To answer your question yes it has improved, The line played well the WR were open and got seperation, The RB ran hard we just need to get more production from the QB as well as less turnovers from that position... I agree with all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 At least 1 Which 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoEd Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Santana moss looked pretty good.I have sunday ticket, so I watched the whole game. Regardless, I don't think your team has improved on offense nearly as much as some people on this board, with all the 20+ point predictions from around here. Maybe a little though. We'll see against your cowgirls next week how much we've improved. I guess you would say that your pickup of Drew and his wheelchair makes dallas so much better. Chicago has a hell of a defense and we played solid ball. One fumble and an obvious missed roughing the passer call and the game would have been a hell of a lot different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.