3CardMonte Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 huddle report THE HUDDLE REPORT INDEX RANKINGS 2005 WEEK 1 rank team rating 1 PATRIOTS 92.39 2 STEELERS 91.68 3 COLTS 89.76 4 CHARGERS 88.63 5 EAGLES 88.58 6 JETS 84.95 7 BILLS 84.53 8 RAVENS 84.16 9 BRONCOS 84.02 10 PACKERS 82.17 11 FALCONS 82.16 12 CHIEFS 81.48 13 PANTHERS 81.26 14 JAGUARS 80.95 15 BENGALS 80.55 16 VIKINGS 79.10 17 REDSKINS 78.44 18 SAINTS 78.37 19 SEAHAWKS 78.31 20 TEXANS 77.74 21 RAMS 76.22 22 BUCCANEERS 75.70 23 LIONS 73.79 24 DOLPHINS 73.38 25 COWBOYS 73.14 26 CARDINALS 72.45 27 GIANTS 72.43 28 TITANS 71.99 29 BEARS 70.41 30 RAIDERS 70.18 31 BROWNS 70.14 32 49ERS 66.35 Rankings are based on a statistical formula that takes into account player talent and past performance of the team on the field. They also do some of the best weekly picks I have seen. 3Card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goaldeje Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 One of the highest rankings I have seen the Skins in. Nice to see they aren't buying in to the Dallas hype. We would be the 6th best team in the NFC, which I guess would put us in the playoffs. I hope we end up a little better, but I would be fairly happy with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinshog Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Thats a lil better I'm surprised to see that Raiders that low given the addition of Moss and Jordan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hercules Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Wow, Skins at 17? That's the highest I've seen so far. But Packers at 10 and Vikings at 16? Who beat whom in the playoffs last year? Oh, that's right - Brett Favre is back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocolateCitySkin Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Someone needs to tell the vikes they need a good dc before they can have a good defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Didn't they hire Cotrell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurman Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Ted was fired by Herm for being a bad DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wskin44 Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Based on overall statistical performance last year, #17 is about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denverdan Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Originally posted by skinshog Thats a lil better I'm surprised to see that Raiders that low given the addition of Moss and Jordan. Look no further than their Defense, Norv loves heartbreaking shootouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Om Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Huddle Report? Pfft, what to they know, the biased bunch of maroons. Recycling the same old uninformed crap and----- What's that? They picked us higher than most others have? These guys rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Jones Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 They also rank the Eagles at 5, which is the lowest I have seen them ranked. Skins ranked higher than the Giants and Cowboys, maybe this site does know what they are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Its based upon statistics and not opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Originally posted by Om Huddle Report? Pfft, what to they know, the biased bunch of maroons. Recycling the same old uninformed crap and----- What's that? They picked us higher than most others have? These guys rock. Beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Originally posted by Kilmer Its based upon statistics and not opinions. Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14% of people know that. Thanks Homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Originally posted by Kilmer Its based upon statistics and not opinions. That explains the numerical ratings, and the absence of moronic rationalizations to explain arbitrary rankings...("Eli Manning is ready to challenge Donovan McNabb for best QB in the NFC East"..."Kurt Warner is just what the Cardinals need to turn them into NFC West champions") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Originally posted by PleaseBlitz Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14% of people know that. Thanks Homer. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 i was wondering how the Cheifs were rianked that high, then I realized they got all those defensive players. Even still I wouldnt count on the Cheifs defense for a fantasy team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho fan Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 WOW! Nice to see some rankings that are based on something other than opinion. This ranking seems about right for the Skins... It is amazing how low the Vikings are ranked compared to how high most "Experts" have them. A couple of the "experts" have picked the Vikings to win the NFC. Do any of you think the Vikes could win the NFC? I am not sure they will win their division. Sure their defense will be better, but its not hard to improve from where they were.:logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamshatterer Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 Chiefs should be ranked lower than us. No Defense!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 Originally posted by Om Huddle Report? Pfft, what to they know, the biased bunch of maroons. Recycling the same old uninformed crap and----- What's that? They picked us higher than most others have? These guys rock. :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoDannyBoy Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 I did not understand the Cowboys ranking on other polls. They just signed a bunch of players and that is going to change everything? They have Bledsoe, but I guess he is an improvement on Vinnie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Green Bay #10? GB is going to be certified monkey crap this year. They are lucky they are in one of the worst divisions in football so they can make the playoff regulary. but I doubt they will even get to that this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Originally posted by GoDannyBoy I did not understand the Cowboys ranking on other polls. They just signed a bunch of players and that is going to change everything? They have Bledsoe, but I guess he is an improvement on Vinnie! If we did the same thing you would be outraged that our ranking wasn't higher than the year before. Isn't that what everyone does? Goes out and signs a bunch of players to get better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Hey, wait a minute.... I don't like the Cowboys ranking.. no fair! Those guys are idiots just hating on the Boys... Everyone hates us! Those guys don't know crap! :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkart Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 I like this one a lot better than the last ranking i seen where they had Da bears ahead of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.