steveo21 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 http://badassdigest.com/2013/03/05/carrie-fisher-returning-for-star-wars-episode-vii/ Carrie Fisher was recently hospitalized for a bipolar episode, forcing her to cancel out as keynote speaker at a Florida fundraiser. Before that kerfuffle, though, she gave an interview to Palm Beacn Illustrated, who ran the interview even though Fisher's mom, Debbie Reynolds, replaced her as speaker. During the course of the talk the interviewer asked if she would be returning as Princess Leia in Star Wars Episode VII, and Fisher bluntly said "Yes." The follow-up question: what is Princess Leia like now? Elderly. She's in an intergalactic old folks' home [laughs]. I just think she would be just like she was before, only slower and less inclined to be up for the big battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 *sigh*...I'm so apprehensive about this movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 This just sound like it's going to be awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMS Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 This just sound like it's going to be awful. I don't think Disney paid 2 billion dollars to make awful movies. I'm very optimistic.... Why would anybody ask Carie Fisher about playing Princess Leia again? That's basically the only role she's ever had, I'm sure she's been up for playing Princess Leia again for 3 decades. I hope they can get R2D2 again, I hear he's done very well as a day trader and might not be available for future acting roles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I'm glad they're going to keep the tradition of terrible acting going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d0ublestr0ker0ll Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I don't think Disney paid 2 billion dollars to make awful movies. I'm very optimistic. Because as we all know, a bigger budget makes a better movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airborneskins Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 She will probably play the motherly role in this movie as I am guessing that it will end up being about her (and Han Solo's) kids. I think that I heard Mark Hammil say that he was going to be in it as an elder uncle (like OBi Wan in the originals). I guess the real question is what they will do (if anything) with Harrison Ford? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I don't think Disney paid 2 billion dollars to make awful movies. I'm very optimistic.... Why would anybody ask Carie Fisher about playing Princess Leia again? That's basically the only role she's ever had, I'm sure she's been up for playing Princess Leia again for 3 decades. I hope they can get R2D2 again, I hear he's done very well as a day trader and might not be available for future acting roles. Disney paid 2 billion dollars to sell a bunch of toys and merch that'll go along with an awful movie. Star Wars junkies will go see it no matter what. It'll do well at the box office, but that doesn't mean they'll be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Disney paid 2 billion dollars to sell a bunch of toys and merch that'll go along with an awful movie. Star Wars junkies will go see it no matter what. It'll do well at the box office, but that doesn't mean they'll be good. I'm holding out some hope just because Disney has actually done pretty well by Marvel. Carrie getting a cameo is cool to me. Neither she nor Mark should have a significant role unless Mark becomes Yoda/Ben. As for the careers, Carrie had an interesting career as a supporting actress after Star Wars. Not shabby, not great. She wasn't the beauty that really could headline movies and she really was too short to take on the Sigornea Weaver tough gal roles. Mark, primarily because of that horrific accident, wound up with a really nice voice over career, and Harrison was obviously the major star of the bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Because as we all know, a bigger budget makes a better movie Of course it does and Disney knows this. See John Carter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 The SW franchise got dumb with the prequels. It was already campy before, arguably intentionally. George Lucas was just so ham fisted with the execution. Zero interest in this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiingspadee Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Because JJ Abrams is behind it I fully support it and believe in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM72 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 You know, people just love to complain. Did you really think they were gonna make Star Wars set about 30 years after Return of the Jedi and not ask the original cast back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I'm holding out some hope just because Disney has actually done pretty well by Marvel. Carrie getting a cameo is cool to me. Neither she nor Mark should have a significant role unless Mark becomes Yoda/Ben.As for the careers, Carrie had an interesting career as a supporting actress after Star Wars. Not shabby, not great. She wasn't the beauty that really could headline movies and she really was too short to take on the Sigornea Weaver tough gal roles. Mark, primarily because of that horrific accident, wound up with a really nice voice over career, and Harrison was obviously the major star of the bunch. I do believe her massive coke habit had something to do with her career never really taking off, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 No matter how many times Lucy puts down this football, I'm always going to head at it full steam. I can watch IV and V over and over. The rest of them are godawful messes. But, I saw them all in the theatre, so............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM72 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 No matter how many times Lucy puts down this football, I'm always going to head at it full steam.I can watch IV and V over and over. The rest of them are godawful messes. But, I saw them all in the theatre, so............ Exactly, and as bad as Ep 1-3 were, I already can't wait to purchase tix to a midnight showing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 You know, people just love to complain. Did you really think they were gonna make Star Wars set about 30 years after Return of the Jedi and not ask the original cast back? It worked great for the newest Indiana Jones movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM72 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 It worked great for the newest Indiana Jones movie. The difference is, Indiana Jones is based on one character where Star Wars is not. There's a lot more story in the Star Wars universe than in the Indiana Jones franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 It was 4 billion for Star Wars. Indiana Jones franchise came with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I was just making a point about how bringing back horrible actors, for nostalgic reasons isn't going to improve anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM72 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I was just making a point about how bringing back horrible actors, for nostalgic reasons isn't going to improve anything. As long as the story is good, the acting really doesn't matter all that much. Did anyone really care that Hamill and Fisher wasn't the greatest actors in the original trilogy? It's Star Wars, not The Godfather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-Dog Night Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 I'm guessing she doesn't look like this anymore: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjah Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Did Jabba the Hut have any kids? Because at this point I think I'd rather see one of them in the metal bikini. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM72 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Did any of you really think Fisher would look the same 30 years removed from Return of the Jedi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 This just sound like it's going to be awful. Why? JJ Abrams did a fine job with Nemoy in Star Trek, as long as Fisher isn't in the bikini I think it'll be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.