jnova Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Man this pisses me off. I mean atleast were getting a halfway decent WR for Coles. But Moss isn't really that great without a pick. And he (Moss) wont fit in our system, Gardner wouldve proven himself last year if he wanted to be on the team he could do it this year, if we keep him. Plus i want to add even with Sammels restructuring were not gonna keep Smoot. We may possibly not even be able to keep Pierce. In my opinion Smoot is more important that Pierce. We still have Barrow and he's not some bum off the street he is a major threat on D. If Pierce is gone i wouldnt be surprised to see him moved back to ROLB on another team. Man this really shows something about or front office. IS THAT BETTER EVERYONE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Worthy Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Die Hard Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 If you want to participate in this forum... and actually have people communicate with you... you might want to make an effort attempting to clearly communicate a coherent message. Ebonics won't help any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Thread of the year! :thumbsup: Edit: I'm just glad they weren't sitting in a tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Are you speaking Canadian or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs' Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by jnova man this pisses me off i mean atleast were gettin a halfway decent WR for coles but moss isnt really that great without a pick and he wont fit in our system, Gardner wouldve proven himself last year if he could do it this year. Plus i want toadd even with Sammels restructuring were not gonna keep smoot possibly not even pierce in my opinion smoot is more important that pierce we still have barrow and hes not just some bum off the street. if pierce is gone i wouldnt be surprised to see him moved back to ROLB. man this really shows something about or front office Let me try to translate for jnova..... He is upset because we will only be getting Santana Moss and no draft picks from the Jets for Coles.....He then goes on to say Moss will not fit well into the Redskins offensive scheme....Not sure his point about Gardner, maybe he meant....hell, I have no idea....He then goes on to say that even if Samuels restructures his contract we might not be able to keep Smoot or Pierece and he would prefer to keep Pierce because we still have Mike Barrow who is no bum off the street. He is not pleased with our front office.... Translations By Bugs' $20 an hour, just PM me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Bugs' Let me try to translate for jnova..... He is upset because we will only be getting Santana Moss and no draft picks from the Jets for Coles.....He then goes on to say Moss will not fit well into the Redskins offensive scheme....Not sure his point about Gardner, maybe he meant....hell, I have no idea....He then goes on to say that even if Samuels restructures his contract we might not be able to keep Smoot or Pierece and he would prefer to keep Pierce because we still have Mike Barrow who is no bum off the street. He is not pleased with our front office.... Translations By Bugs' $20 an hour, just PM me I have a few PM's from jnova I may need help with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilgamesh Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Bugs' Let me try to translate for jnova..... He is upset because we will only be getting Santana Moss and no draft picks from the Jets for Coles.....He then goes on to say Moss will not fit well into the Redskins offensive scheme....Not sure his point about Gardner, maybe he meant....hell, I have no idea....He then goes on to say that even if Samuels restructures his contract we might not be able to keep Smoot or Pierece and he would prefer to keep Pierce because we still have Mike Barrow who is no bum off the street. He is not pleased with our front office.... Translations By Bugs' $20 an hour, just PM me Thanks for that Bugs...do you do birthday parties as well? I'd prefere something other than the whole clown thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs' Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by CrazyZeb I have a few PM's from jnova I may need help with. np.. Originally posted by Gilgamesh Thanks for that Bugs...do you do birthday parties as well? I'd prefere something other than the whole clown thing... Hey buddy, what did you have in mind :whippin: ? $30/hr. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Wow, and we bit*h about our school systems! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Die Hard If you want to participate in this forum... and actually have people communicate with you... you might want to make an effort attempting to clearly communicate a coherent message. Ebonics won't help any. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Actually, Jnova's post, while not unified in theme, is understandable if you insert your own punctuation. Emotional ranting to be sure, but I was able to understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Gfunk703 Are you speaking Canadian or something? Can't be, otherwise DieHard would have understood it.:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnova Posted February 25, 2005 Author Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Bugs' Let me try to translate for jnova..... He is upset because we will only be getting Santana Moss and no draft picks from the Jets for Coles.....He then goes on to say Moss will not fit well into the Redskins offensive scheme....Not sure his point about Gardner, maybe he meant....hell, I have no idea....He then goes on to say that even if Samuels restructures his contract we might not be able to keep Smoot or Pierece and he would prefer to keep Pierce because we still have Mike Barrow who is no bum off the street. He is not pleased with our front office.... Translations By Bugs' $20 an hour, just PM me thank you bugs but i didnt mean i wanted to keep peirce i meant i wanted to keep smoot. i was trying to say that gardner hasnt done alot to prove that he will stay in washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnova Posted February 25, 2005 Author Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by Ghost of Nibbs McPimpin Actually, Jnova's post, while not unified in theme, is understandable if you insert your own punctuation. Emotional ranting to be sure, but I was able to understand it. Thank you it was emotional i dont like to type punctuation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herrmag Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Now that the message is clear, can someone explain the 2nd option in the poll? Why would anyone choose to trade Coles for Moss AND lose Smoot "and maybe Pierce"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooper Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 What's he saying is that if we are in fact absorbing a 9 million dollar cap hit in the Coles trade, there is no way we can sign either Pierce or Smoot. And he's probably right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnova Posted February 25, 2005 Author Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by herrmag Now that the message is clear, can someone explain the 2nd option in the poll? Why would anyone choose to trade Coles for Moss AND lose Smoot "and maybe Pierce"? I mean a draft Pick and loss Smoot and or Pierce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by jnova Thank you it was emotional i dont like to type punctuation Hey jnova, I made you a smiley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 ok moss cant come if gardner proves then last year cause defense looses peirce smoot then barrow okay he no sloach of the street. And the cap hit to of Samels. OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 That's covers it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzSkinsFan63 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Damn I remember now I wanted Gardner..doh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by CrazyZeb I have a few PM's from jnova I may need help with. You to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by CrazyZeb Hey jnova, I made you a smiley. :rotflmao: DH that's got to be added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.