CrazyZeb Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Originally posted by TK-IV II I :rotflmao: DH that's got to be added. I thought the exclamation point gave it a touch of irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Gardner wouldve proven himself last year if he wanted to be on the team he could do it this year, if we keep him. :laugh: Ok, first off, this is the only part of what was said that made any sense, & even that's a stretch. Gardner has been here how many years? Has he EVER shown us more than 50/50? Hell no. You need to put the crackpipe down & walk away slowly. You have fried your young brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Originally posted by jnova I mean a draft Pick and loss Smoot and or Pierce What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esteffan Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Originally posted by CowboyzSuckAzz What? I'm guessing that loss=lose, but I have no idea. I now have to leave this thread and get a drink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedlamVR Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 I understood the first post right up until the time you started explaining it J... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Originally posted by esteffan I'm guessing that loss=lose, but I have no idea. I now have to leave this thread and get a drink. I understand the "loss=lose" thing. What I don't understand is why we would trade Coles for Moss & a pick & "loss" Pierce & Smoot. Is he saying that we won't be able to keep them or we are going to trade them too for Moss. Either will work considering the history of our FO, but I don't agree with trading them all for one WR that may be a downgrade from Coles. It seems a bit excessive to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurgundyBomber Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Ebonics won't help any. That really isn't fair to Ebonics. He might have been speaking Molson or Labatt's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTaylor22 Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Moss is alright. He will do for one year, and makes unbelievable catches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDALERT Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 Originally posted by Bugs' Let me try to translate for jnova..... He is upset because we will only be getting Santana Moss and no draft picks from the Jets for Coles.....He then goes on to say Moss will not fit well into the Redskins offensive scheme....Not sure his point about Gardner, maybe he meant....hell, I have no idea....He then goes on to say that even if Samuels restructures his contract we might not be able to keep Smoot or Pierece and he would prefer to keep Pierce because we still have Mike Barrow who is no bum off the street. He is not pleased with our front office.... Translations By Bugs' $20 an hour, just PM me Translations by bugs $20.00 PM Bug, $Priceless$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.