clskinsfan Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 8 minutes ago, mac8887 said: you cherry-pick the plays you want Cherry Pick? I posted every single play he made in the first half. A half where he had FOUR completions. You should do a breakdown for us bro. But right now I am gonna have to put you on ignore. Because quite honestly you are pissing me off. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I got some alert to an ESPN story Fields is not going to compete for the starting role but is going to learn from “the 8 time pro bowler and SB champion.” CLEARLY “leaked” by the Steelers. Tomlin was probably on the phones like this making sure everybody knew Fields is a backup: Just now, clskinsfan said: Cherry Pick? I posted every single play he made in the first half. A half where he had FOUR completions. You should do a breakdown for us bro. But right now I am gonna have to put you on ignore. Because quite honestly you are pissing me off. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oraphus Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 While Wilson might be fuming… great move by the Steelers, because when a starter goes down in preseason next year they can flip either Wilson or fields for a much higher round draft pick. Easy money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanka Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I’ve never seen a QB have better PR than Justin Fields. There’s some Bears fans losing their minds like they just traded Burrow 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
actorguy1 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Bears we’re always moving on from Fields, doesn’t change a thing, just like us trading Howell, it simply clears the room… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
actorguy1 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 4 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 7 minutes ago, oraphus said: While Wilson might be fuming… great move by the Steelers, because when a starter goes down in preseason next year they can flip either Wilson or fields for a much higher round draft pick. Easy money They’ve come out and loudly said Fields is the backup and won’t even compete for the starting job. Russ is better than Fields by a lot anyway. (Except to Bram). I doubt he sees Fields as a remote threat to his starting. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 All the people who posted on Twitter that we should trade for Fields. He was the answer... 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Voice_of_Reason said: They’ve come out and loudly said Fields is the backup and won’t even compete for the starting job. Russ is better than Fields by a lot anyway. (Except to Bram). I doubt he sees Fields as a remote threat to his starting. Agreed. I think Wilson will shut a few people up around the league. All whilst Denver pay him nearly 40mil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Yep, this could still be a suboptimal outcome for the Bears if Caleb doesn’t live up to the hype and Stroud keeps ascending. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, Est.1974 said: Bears we’re always moving on from Fields, doesn’t change a thing, just like us trading Howell, it simply clears the room… It ends the ridiculous conspiracy theories Caleb won’t play for the Bears and that’s why they were hanging onto Fields. So that’s good. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Voice_of_Reason said: It ends the ridiculous conspiracy theories Caleb won’t play for the Bears and that’s why they were hanging onto Fields. Agreed. They were always going rookie QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 7 minutes ago, HTTRDynasty said: Yep, this could still be a suboptimal outcome for the Bears if Caleb doesn’t live up to the hype and Stroud keeps ascending. Meh. I dont really fault them for giving him another year. This year proved what he is though. A backup. Regardless of how he diced up our pathetic defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballZombie Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 I hereby welcome everyone who thought the Bears were going to hold on to Justin Fields. Join us in reality. Glad that's something we don't gotta talk about anymore. 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 34 minutes ago, Blanka said: I’ve never seen a QB have better PR than Justin Fields. There’s some Bears fans losing their minds like they just traded Burrow Agreed. There was chatter this past offseason that he could be an MVP candidate. Madness. He has been straight up garbage passing the ball. We got more value out of trading Sam Howell for a reason. (He can actually throw the ball) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanut0862 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 9 hours ago, RabidFan said: Saw this on X yesterday and sorry if already posted but he takes stupid hits (worse than Sam) when running and doesn't have Sam's thickness to withstand This was from a Giants fan saying he wants no part of Jayden over Jones. I'll have high hopes if we draft Daniels but man he can't seem to get out of the way. He needs to watch some film of Barry Sanders or Lamar and learn to get out of the way of those hits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 39 minutes ago, Est.1974 said: Agreed. They were always going rookie QB. You still holding on bruh lolol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) 2 hours ago, Est.1974 said: Agreed. They were always going rookie QB. I'll say this: IF Caleb decided to pull an Eli, the Bears pretty much lost all leverage. They would almost have to deal with a team within the top 3 to ensure they get a QB.......assuming they were high on Maye, Daniels of course. Edited March 17 by BRAVEONAWARPATH 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice_of_Reason Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 5 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: I'll say this: IF Caleb decided to pull an Eli, the Bears pretty much lost all leverage. They would almost have to deal with a team within the top 3 to ensure they get a QB.......assuming they were high on Mayes, Daniels of course. Eh. Top 8. They could sell McCarthy in Chicago. Plenty of Michigan fans in that area. But Caleb isn’t pulling an Eli and he’s going to play for the Bears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballZombie Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 16 minutes ago, Skinsinparadise said: Yup Everybody knew they were moving on so the Bears had no leverage. Kenny demanded a trade so Pitt had no leverage. I believe we would have kept Howell unless a offer we couldn't refuse came in and they wrench him off of us, and that is what happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.3d05d94a5044fa9ada2aa8cc7156fc2a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now